Supreme Court grapples with challenge to Biden immigration policy on deportation

  • In Politics
  • 2022-11-29 18:36:41Z

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court wrestled Tuesday with a Biden administration effort to prioritize certain immigrants in the country illegally for deportation over others in a case the government warned could "scramble" immigration enforcement.

During more than two hours of spirited oral argument, the justices appeared split in unconventional ways - particularly when it came to some of the procedural questions raised by the challenge from Texas and Louisiana. The states say President Joe Biden's policy has forced them to spend more money on law enforcement and health care.

At issue is a Biden effort to focus enforcement on immigrants who pose a threat to national security, public safety or who recently crossed the border. The administration says it wants to focus on those classes of immigrants because it doesn't have the resources to go after everyone in the country illegally. The states assert federal law gives Biden far less discretion to pick and choose targets for enforcement.

"It's our job to say what the law is, not whether or not it can be possibly implemented or whether there are difficulties there," Chief Justice John Roberts said, embracing an argument raised by Texas and Louisiana. "I don't think we should change that responsibility just because Congress and the executive can't agree on something."

Arguments: Supreme Court returns to immigration in test of Biden's power

Power?: Biden's ability to bypass Congress faces 'major' legal hurdle at SCOUTS

Stay in the conversation on politics: Sign up for the OnPolitics newsletter

But Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, another member of the court's conservative wing, repeatedly returned to a line of questioning about the practical impact of a ruling in favor of Texas and Louisiana given that the Biden administration - like its predecessors - doesn't have the resources to fully implement all of the requirements set out in immigration law.

"If you prevail here, what will happen?" Kavanaugh asked the lawyer representing Texas. "That's a concern because I'm not sure much will change because they don't have the resources to change."

The case is one of several challenging Biden's authority to make policy without explicit authorization from Congress - an issue likely to become more prominent now that Republicans will control the House of Representatives. Biden's record at the high court on that question has been spotty, with the 6-3 conservative majority shutting down his COVID-19 eviction moratorium and vaccine-or-testing mandate for large employers.

Though the case is about the Biden effort, the court spent far more time debating procedural questions about whether states are able to sue over such policies and what lower federal courts can do once those suits are filed. Several justices from both ideological wings scrutinized a position put forth by the administration that a single trial court judge shouldn't be permitted to wipe out a policy for the entire nation.

Both Roberts and Kavanaugh described the government's view as "radical."

A group of migrants look for a place to cross the Rio Grande in Piedras Negras, Mexico on November, 16, 2022
A group of migrants look for a place to cross the Rio Grande in Piedras Negras, Mexico on November, 16, 2022  

Immigration advocates question whether Texas and Louisiana should be allowed to sue at all. The states claim Biden's policy forced them to spend more money but critics have said the states have sought to increase their populations and that those costs would rise with an influx of non-immigrants as well. Associate Justice Elena Kagan, nominated to the court by President Barack Obama, questioned the implications of Texas' argument.

"We're just going to be in a situation where every administration is confronted by suits by states that can bring a policy to a dead halt, to a dead stop by just showing a dollar's worth of costs?" Kagan questioned. "We're creating a system where a combination of states and courts can bring immigration policy to a dead halt."

The Biden administration laid out its immigration priorities in a Department of Homeland Security memorandum last year. But the states say federal law demands more than Biden's approach: It requires the government detain immigrants who have committed certain crimes, such as aggravated felonies or human trafficking. The Biden administration doesn't have the power, they say, to pick and choose.

A federal district court in Texas sided with the states and halted the policy's enforcement. A three-judge panel of the New Orleans-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit - all three of whom were nominated by GOP presidents - declined to put the district court's ruling on hold. Biden then filed an emergency request in July asking the Supreme Court to review the 5th Circuit's decision.

Days later, a 5-4 majority of the court declined Biden's request, barring his ability to carry out the policy. But the court also agreed to hear oral arguments, shifting the case off its emergency docket and delving more deeply into the merits of the legal questions at issue. The court's three liberal justices - joined by conservative Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett - said they would have granted the Biden administration's request.

A decision in the case is expected next year.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Supreme Court grapples with Biden immigration policy on deportation


More Related News

Do Abortion Rights Hang On State Constitutions?
Do Abortion Rights Hang On State Constitutions?

When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and the constitutional right to abortion in June, it declared that it was sending the issue back to the "people...

Should federal grants favor highway repair over expansion?
Should federal grants favor highway repair over expansion?
  • World
  • 2023-01-29 15:15:17Z

Arizona officials refer to a notoriously congested stretch of desert highway through tribal land as the Wild Horse Pass Corridor, a label that's less about...

CBS News poll: Public sees Biden cooperating with documents investigation
CBS News poll: Public sees Biden cooperating with documents investigation

Republicans see different treatment for President Biden than for Trump.

US, Netherlands and Japan reportedly agree to limit China
US, Netherlands and Japan reportedly agree to limit China's access to chipmaking equipment

The Biden administration has reportedly reached an agreement with the Netherlands and Japan to restrict China's access to advanced chipmaking machinery made ...

A Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate and her husband want to open an indoor gun range to host weddings,
A Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate and her husband want to open an indoor gun range to host weddings, 'high-end meetings' and 'easter egg hunts'

Waukesha County Judge Jennifer Dorow, a conservative, is one of four people running to take the seat of Justice Patience Roggensack.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply


Top News: Politics