Military sexual assault survivors should be able to sue for damages, judges rule

  • In US
  • 2022-08-11 20:13:54Z
  • By Air Force Times

An ongoing lawsuit against the former vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff caught a big break Thursday when a panel of judges ruled that the general's former aide, who has accused him of sexual assault during her time working with him, does in fact have the right to sue him for damages.

Attorneys for the government, on behalf of now-retired Air Force Gen. John Hyten, had sought to get the suit dismissed on the basis that the Feres doctrine prohibits troops from seeking damages for injuries sustained during service, except in cases of medical malpractice.

But Feres, a 1950 Supreme Court ruling intended to block troops from suing over combat and training casualties, doesn't apply to sexual assault because the "alleged sexual assault [could] not conceivably serve any military purpose," a three-judge panel from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco wrote in their decision.

The judges upheld a lower court's ruling allowing retired Army Col. Kathryn Spletstoser's lawsuit to proceed to trial. She originally filed the case in November 2019, after a previous Air Force investigation could not substantiate her claims.

Spletstoser came forward earlier that year as Hyten was being considered for the vice chairman job, alleging that he had sexually assaulted her during his time as head of U.S. Strategic Command.

Her lawsuit falls into a bit of a legal gray area, as she sued Hyten individually for the assault, rather than the military in general for any sort of negligence. Still, Justice Department lawyers have been representing Hyten, arguing that because the incident took place during their military service, it falls under their jurisdiction.

Thursday's ruling may end up setting a precedent either way, allowing military sexual assault survivors to sue not only their assailants, but the Defense Department as well.

Air Force Gen.
Air Force Gen.  

"The court, without specifically saying it, made it clear that they don't think sexual assault is ever going to be incident to service," retired Air Force Col. Don Christensen, a former chief prosecutor who is now president of service member advocacy group Protect Our Defenders, told Military Times on Thursday.

The effects could be seen locally at first, in the 9th Circuit, as a new precedent. That might also influence other circuits, but there's a third option, wherein the Justice Department could appeal this latest ruling and send the case to the Supreme Court, which could decide once and for all whether service members can sue over sexual assault.

Supreme Court justice castigates Feres Doctrine over cadet's rape lawsuit

Feres has at least one enemy there in Justice Clarence Thomas.

"At a minimum, we should take up this case to clarify the scope of the immunity we have created," Thomas wrote in a 2021 dissenting opinion, after the court ruled against a former West Point cadet seeking damages for an alleged rape. "Without any statutory text to serve as a guide, lower courts are understandably confused about what counts as an injury 'incident' to military service."

Thomas invoked an example in which, if one civilian and one service member are injured due to government negligence in the same incident, only the civilian would have any recourse.

"Under our precedent, if two Pentagon employees - one civilian and one a servicemember - are hit by a bus in the Pentagon parking lot and sue, it may be that only the civilian would have a chance to litigate his claim on the merits," he wrote.

To uphold the Feres doctrine in Spletstoser v. Hyten, the Supreme Court would have to explain why it believes sexual assault is an inherent, unavoidable risk to be expected in the course of military service.

"I just can't see them going there," Christensen said.


More Related News

Ohio State files rare legal appeal to maneuver Strauss survivors in court
Ohio State files rare legal appeal to maneuver Strauss survivors in court
  • US
  • 2022-09-28 10:12:45Z

Ohio State filed an en banc review in an attempt to reverse the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision related to former doctor Richard Strauss.

After sharp right turn, U.S. Supreme Court conservatives step on the gas
After sharp right turn, U.S. Supreme Court conservatives step on the gas
  • US
  • 2022-09-28 10:08:43Z

The U.S. Supreme Court last March rebuffed an emergency request by North Carolina Republicans to allow the use in November's congressional elections of an...

Poll: Majority of Americans Disapprove of Affirmative Action in College Admissions
Poll: Majority of Americans Disapprove of Affirmative Action in College Admissions

With the Supreme Court scheduled to hear oral arguments in a pair of landmark affirmative-action cases this fall, a majority of Americans say they disapprove...

Teen interest in long-lasting birth control soars after Roe
Teen interest in long-lasting birth control soars after Roe
  • World
  • 2022-09-27 04:16:59Z

Sixteen-year-old Adismarys Abreu had been discussing a long-lasting birth control implant with her mother for about a year as a potential solution to...

Latin America
Latin America's road to legalizing same-sex marriage

Pre-2010 - Only a handful of countries worldwide recognize same-sex marriage, mostly in Europe. Civil unions grant some marital rights for couples in...

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply


Top News: US