White House rejects House Judiciary document request, seeking to 'narrow the scope' originally appeared on abcnews.go.com
The White House is rejecting the House Judiciary committee's request to turn over documents on a broad range of topics mainly focused on key figures in the 2016 presidential election.
"The White House will not participate in the Committee's 'investigation' that brushes aside the conclusions of the Department of Justice after a two-year-long effort in favor of political theater pre-ordained to reach a preconceived and false result," the letter sent from White House counsel Pat Cipollone reads.
While the White House is not asserting executive privilege over any of the documents the committee chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., requested, they do argue that because the request is so broad it violates all prongs of executive privilege.
"If the committee intends to continue its inquiry," Cipollone wrote, "it would greatly advance that process if the committee were to narrow the scope of the requests."
In early March, Nadler sent document requests to eighty-one individuals and entities requesting documents and records as part of his investigation "into the alleged obstruction of justice, public corruption, and other abuses of power by President Trump, his associates, and members of his Administration." The individuals contacted included members of the Trump family, key figures in the president's campaign, as well as past and present White House aides.
(MORE: House Democrats launch broad probe into allegations of potential corruption, obstruction of justice against Trump)
The committee asked multiple individuals for "any contacts, direct or indirect, from January 1, 2015 to January 20, 2017 between or involving the Russian Federation and its officials, agents, intermediaries, and/or instrumentalities." Additionally, the committee asked certain individuals and the Trump Organization for document related to the company's efforts on a project in Moscow.
(MORE: Former Clinton White House attorney warns fight for unredacted Mueller report not 'the right battle' for Democrats)
The document request also focused on events during the Trump administration including any conversations about presidential pardons, and meetings or conversations the president had with the Russian government and other foreign leaders.
When Nadler submitted the requests in March, the White House slammed what it called the committee's "fishing expedition," describing it as "disgraceful and abusive."
In its letter on Tuesday, the White House called the House committee's probe "duplicative" of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation.
"Congressional investigations are intended to obtain information to aid in evaluating potential legislation, not to harass political opponents or to pursue an unauthorized 'do-over' of exhaustive law enforcement investigations conducted by the Department of Justice," Cipollone wrote.
Responding on Tuesday, Nadler dismissed the White House's "extraordinary demand" for Democrats to stop their inquiry, and the argument that their work would "duplicate" Mueller's own investigation.
"This flies in the face of the American idea that no one is above the law, and I reject it," he wrote in a statement. "Our investigation into this as well as other troubling conduct by this Administration will continue."
He added, "The White House also claims it is willing to cooperate with this Committee while at the same time refusing to work with Congress. ... The Committee remains willing to discuss any reasonable accommodations, but accommodation takes two."
(MORE: What we learned from the House Judiciary's outreach to Trump world)
Out of the eighty-one individuals and entities contacted, few have supplied the House Committee with any documents or response. So far, former Trump aide Steve Bannon, Trump inauguration chairman Tom Barrack, and the National Rifle Association are among a very small group that have provided the committee with any documents or responses.
ABC News' Benjamin Siegel contributed reporting.