'Whistleblower' must testify under oath and in person: Rep. Jim Jordan




\
\'Whistleblower\' must testify under oath and in person: Rep. Jim Jordan  

There are 435 members of the House of Representatives. Only one knows the "whistleblower's" identity: Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff.

Democrats are trying to impeach President Donald Trump less than a year before the election based on claims from this anonymous individual who has no firsthand knowledge of the president's phone call with Ukraine's president, but who admitted a political bias and reportedly worked with Joe Biden, a 2020 presidential candidate.

Six weeks ago, Schiff said the "whistleblower" would testify. He has now changed his mind. What happened in the interim? Just two things: We learned the individual met with Schiff's staff. And we learned about their political bias.

The "whistleblower" only knew about the call from the characterizations of others. He waited 18 days before filing a complaint with the inspector general. During those 18 days, the "whistleblower" met with Schiff's staff but failed to disclose this communication to the inspector general. Schiff also hid this meeting.

Americans understand fairness. They know when someone is getting a raw deal. The Democrats' impeachment push, based on this anonymous and secondhand complaint, is fundamentally unfair.

OUR VIEW: Don't reveal the whistleblower

Despite Schiff's biased process, four fundamental facts have not changed:

►President Trump and President Volodymyr Zelensky affirmed there was no quid pro quo and no pressure.

►The transcript of the call shows no conditionality.

►At the time of the call, Ukraine did not know security aid was delayed.

►Ukraine never took any of the actions it was supposedly under pressure to take.

Government whistleblowers should be protected. But a fundamental tenet of due process is the ability to confront one's accusers. On a matter as grave as impeachment, Americans should assess for themselves the credibility and motivations of the individual who initiated the inquiry.

That is why the "whistleblower" must testify under oath and in person.

Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, is ranking member of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform.

If you can't see this reader poll, please refresh your page.

What do you think of the opposing view?

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: 'Whistleblower' must testify under oath and in person: Rep. Jim Jordan

COMMENTS

More Related News

McConnell, Coordinating With White House, Lays Plans for Impeachment Trial
McConnell, Coordinating With White House, Lays Plans for Impeachment Trial

WASHINGTON -- With the House headed to a vote to impeach President Donald Trump next week, Sen. Mitch McConnell was working hand in hand with the White House to make plans for a Senate trial, a proceeding steeped in tradition and rules, but one fraught with political peril for vulnerable Republicans.Trump

Democrats say they won
Democrats say they won't cross picket line over union conflict at debate host site

A local union at Loyola Marymount University will picket at the university ahead of Thursday's debate.

Democrats threaten to boycott next debate over labor dispute
Democrats threaten to boycott next debate over labor dispute

All seven Democratic presidential candidates who qualified for next week's debate threatened on Friday to skip the event if an ongoing labor dispute forces them to cross picket lines on the campus hosting it. The Democratic National Committee said it is trying to come up with an "acceptable resolution" to the situation so the debate can proceed. A labor union called UNITE HERE Local 11 says it will picket as Loyola Marymount University hosts Thursday's sixth Democratic debate of the cycle, and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders responded by tweeting they wouldn't participate if that meant crossing it.

Democrats Agree on One Thing: They
Democrats Agree on One Thing: They're Very, Very Nervous

GREENWOOD, S.C. -- The past three years have not been easy for the political fortunes or the emotional health of America's Democrats. To the extent they feel optimistic about anything, they have been waiting for the 2020 election in the way inhabitants of a storm-ravaged city might look toward the

Proposed amendment in articles of impeachment says Ukraine received aid - live updates
Proposed amendment in articles of impeachment says Ukraine received aid - live updates

If the Judiciary Committee approves either of the two articles - Abuse of Power, Obstruction of Congress - the full House will likely vote on impeachment next week.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

  • AllisonPlvn
    (2019-11-08 09:30:26Z)

    http://trustonlinepharmacies.com - canadianpharmacymeds com drugs in canada without prescription

    REPLY

Top News: Latin America