Under pressure, U.S. Justice Department defends handling of Mueller report




 

By Andy Sullivan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department on Thursday defended its handling of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report examining contacts between President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign and Russia as it faced increased pressure to make the document public.

The Justice Department said Attorney General William Barr must strike confidential information from the nearly 400-page document as reports surfaced in the news media that members of Mueller's team were unhappy with the way Barr had characterized its main conclusions.

Congressional Democrats also have demanded the report's quick release in its entirety. Barr, appointed by the Republican president, has pledged to release a redacted version by mid-April.

Barr said last week that Mueller's 22-month inquiry did not establish that Trump's campaign conspired with Russia in the election. Barr also said Mueller also did not reach a conclusion on whether Trump had illegally interfered with the Russia investigation, which has cast a shadow over his presidency.

While Mueller did not exonerate Trump, Barr said he then concluded there was not enough evidence to show that Trump committed the crime of obstruction of justice.

The New York Times and the Washington Post reported that some investigators were unhappy with the way Barr had described their findings, in a sign of tensions between some members of Mueller's team and administration officials overseeing the report's release.

The Post reported that Mueller's staff prepared summaries for each section of the report free of confidential information that might require redaction, with the goal that Barr could release them to the public.

Every page of Mueller's report contains a warning that it might contain confidential material, so Barr decided first to release the report's main findings as quickly as possible, Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said.

"The Department continues to work with the Special Counsel on appropriate redactions to the report so that it can be released to Congress and the public," Kupec said in a statement.

Congressional Democrats have also questioned Barr's characterization of the report.

The House of Representatives Judiciary Committee on Wednesday authorized its chairman to subpoena the department to obtain Mueller's full, unredacted report, moving closer to a legal clash with the Trump administration.

Congress, not Barr, should determine what gets made public, Democratic Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler said on Thursday.

"The House makes those judgments. We are entitled to that information and we need that information," Nadler told reporters.

FBI Director Christopher Wray told Congress he had not seen Mueller's report.

(Additional reporting by David Morgan and Sarah N. Lynch; Editing by Will Dunham and Ross Colvin)

COMMENTS

More Related News

Attorney general taps prosecutor to look into episodes of
Attorney general taps prosecutor to look into episodes of 'unmasking' by Obama administration officials

Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said John Bash, U.S. attorney for the Western District of Texas, will look into the issue.

Trump says he will veto FISA deal as House tests historic proxy voting system
Trump says he will veto FISA deal as House tests historic proxy voting system

The House is set to vote on the bill Wednesday in one of the first tests to the chamber's new and historic proxy voting system due to the coronavirus pandemic.

Inquiry into Russia probe carries political consequences
Inquiry into Russia probe carries political consequences
  • World
  • 2020-05-27 19:08:36Z

Attorney General William Barr says he doesn't expect a criminal inquiry into the origins of the Russia investigation to target former President Barack Obama or Joe Biden, the former vice president and President Donald Trump's Democratic opponent. The inquiry could conclude this summer, meaning fresh revelations might be exploited by Trump in the heat of the election season to damage Biden or to attack the Obama administration.

Ex-Watergate prosecutors say judge has legal duty to review facts in Flynn case
Ex-Watergate prosecutors say judge has legal duty to review facts in Flynn case
  • US
  • 2020-05-27 16:23:00Z

Sixteen former Watergate prosecutors on Wednesday said U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan should be allowed to review all the facts before deciding whether to grant a Justice Department request to drop the criminal case against President Donald Trump's former national security adviser Michael Flynn. In a filing with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, the former prosecutors said they feared the Justice Department was not acting in the public interest, and that Sullivan has the power to scrutinize the request in order to ensure that "the waters of justice are not polluted." Flynn filed an emergency petition with the federal appeals court on May 21, asking the...

DOJ warns Los Angeles, Illinois of possible illegality of stay-at-home orders
DOJ warns Los Angeles, Illinois of possible illegality of stay-at-home orders

Extended stay-at-home orders "may be both arbitrary and unlawful," Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband said in a letter to Los Angeles officials.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Latin America