U.S. Supreme Court lets climate scientist's defamation claim proceed




  • In Science
  • 2019-11-25 14:45:19Z
  • By Reuters
FILE PHOTO: The U.S. Supreme Court is seen in Washington
FILE PHOTO: The U.S. Supreme Court is seen in Washington  

By Lawrence Hurley

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday allowed a prominent climate scientist to pursue a defamation lawsuit against a conservative magazine and a think tank that compared him to a convicted child molester.

The justices declined to hear appeals filed by National Review magazine and the Competitive Enterprise Institute seeking to overturn a lower court's ruling that allowed the lawsuit filed by scientist Michael Mann to go forward.

One justice, conservative Samuel Alito, dissented, writing that the case raised questions "that go to the very heart of the constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech and freedom of the press."

Mann, a Penn State professor known for his research on climate change, filed suit in a local court in the District of Columbia in 2012 after online posts by the magazine and think tank that compared him to convicted child molester Jerry Sandusky, a former assistant football coach at the same university in State College, Pennsylvania.

The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary damages.

Mann over the years has clashed with groups and individuals who have sought to discredit his work. He is best known for what is called a "hockey stick" graph that showed an increase in global temperatures in the 20th century.

Scientific organizations rejected criticism of Mann's work after investigating the matter. Criticism of Mann by conservative climate change skeptics increased after some of his private emails were leaked in 2009.

The Competitive Enterprise Institute is a libertarian think tank that has said it "questions global warming alarmism." In a 2012 post published on a CEI website, former CEI fellow Rand Simberg compared the investigations into Mann with the then-recent national controversy over Sandusky, who was arrested in 2011 and convicted in 2012 of sexually molesting 10 young boys.

"Mann could be said to be the Jerry Sandusky of climate science, except for instead of molesting children, he has molested and tortured data," Simberg wrote.

In a later post on National Review's website, conservative writer Mark Steyn quoted from Simberg's article and referred to Mann's research as "fraudulent."

CEI later removed the Sandusky comparison. The National Review refused to retract its post and instead published a response from its editor Rich Lowry with the headline: "Get Lost."

Two different judges refused to dismiss Mann's lawsuit, prompting the defendants to appeal. The appeals court ruled in favor of Mann in 2016 and in March of this year the District of Columbia Court of Appeals declined to rehear the case.


(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham)

COMMENTS

More Related News

US dumps huge amounts of sand on Miami Beach to tackle climate change erosion
US dumps huge amounts of sand on Miami Beach to tackle climate change erosion

Dozens of trucks have started dumping hundreds of thousands of tons of sand on Miami Beach as part of US government measures to protect Florida's tourist destinations against the effects of climate change. "We have erosion hotspots," said Stephen Leatherman, an expert on beaches and the environment at Florida International University. Leatherman -- known locally as "Dr Beach" -- said that rising sea levels, triggered by climate change, are causing the accelerated erosion of the famous beach, as well as coastal storms and in particular hurricanes.

U.S. Supreme Court takes up presidential Electoral College dispute
U.S. Supreme Court takes up presidential Electoral College dispute
  • US
  • 2020-01-17 20:50:06Z

As the 2020 race heats up, the Supreme Court agreed on Friday to hear a dispute involving the complex U.S. presidential election system focusing on whether Electoral College electors are free to break their pledges to back the candidate who wins their state's popular vote, an act that could upend an election. The Supreme Court will take up appeals in two cases - from Washington state and Colorado - involving electors who decided to vote in the Electoral College process for someone other than Democrat Hillary Clinton in 2016 even though she won the popular vote in their states.

'You have not seen anything yet,' climate activist Greta says ahead of Davos

Swedish activist Greta Thunberg marched with 10,000 protesters in the Swiss city of Lausanne on Friday and said "you have not seen anything yet" before some head to Davos next week to challenge the global financial elite to fight climate change. "So, we are now in a new year and we have entered a new decade and so far, during this decade, we have seen no sign whatsoever that real climate action is coming and that has to change," Thunberg said in a speech in Lausanne. Hundreds will take trains over the weekend and then march to Klosters near Davos, the annual gathering of world political and business leaders that Thunberg is attending for the second year in a row and will take part in...

Old English, Pelosi
Old English, Pelosi's many pens and special walks: Your weird impeachment questions, answered

The third impeachment trial of a U.S. president kicks off Thursday in Washington, and President Donald Trump is the defendant.

12-year sentence for jail phone is
12-year sentence for jail phone is 'failure,' justice says

The Mississippi Supreme Court's confirmation of a 12-year prison sentence for an African American man who carried his mobile phone into a county jail cell is being slammed as a brutal example of racial injustice. Justice Leslie King is currently the only African American justice on the nine-member court.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Science