Trump says it's 'illegal' for Pelosi to tear up his State of the Union address. Experts say that's not true

Trump says it\
Trump says it\'s \'illegal\' for Pelosi to tear up his State of the Union address. Experts say that\'s not true  

WASHINGTON - Departing the White House Friday afternoon, President Donald Trump asserted that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi "broke the law" in tearing up her copy of his State of Union address after he concluded his remarks Tuesday.

"Well I thought it was a terrible thing when she ripped up the speech. First of all, it's an official document. You're not allowed. It's illegal what she did. She broke the law," he told reporters.

Experts, however, disagree with Trump.

Although Trump did not cite a specific law, several of his allies, as well as his son Donald Trump Jr., have asserted that she violated the Presidential Records Act or other statutes governing the maintenance of federal records.

Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., a staunch ally of the president, went so far as to say he would lodge an ethics complaint with the House Ethics Committee alleging Pelosi broke the law.

The law both Gaetz and Donald Trump Jr. cite prohibits the destruction or mutilation of documents filed with any "clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States." Multiple experts said this law did not apply to the incident from Tuesday.

Heidi Kitrosser, a University of Minnesota law professor specializing in federal government secrecy and the separation of powers, told USA TODAY it was "crazy" to suggest Pelosi broke the law.

The Presidential Records Act, which requires the president to preserve records, and other laws governing federal records were "designed to prevent the president and his advisers from shielding documentary information from public view," she explained.

They do not apply to "printouts or widely circulated documents" like copies of the State of the Union, she said.

What would make the document an official presidential record is if it were the one Trump had marked up, she said. A document like that "would be a pretty classic presidential record," Kitrosser said.

City University of New York Law Professor Douglas Cox, an expert on the legal status of documents, agreed the Presidential Records Act did not apply in the Pelosi case.

More: Nancy Pelosi says tearing up Trump speech 'entirely appropriate,' says president seemed 'sedated' at SOTU

Cox told USA TODAY the copy Pelosi ripped up "is not a presidential record" and therefore is not subject to the Presidential Records Act.

"The President's copy is a presidential record, but if the President gives a copy of it to a member of Congress, that copy is no longer a presidential record and becomes a record of that member of Congress," he said.

"Because Speaker Pelosi's copy is not a government record, she did not violate the law by ripping it up," he said.

More: 'Pelosi disgraced herself': GOP outraged by Pelosi ripping up Trump State of the Union speech

Kel McClanahan, an attorney specializing in national security law and information and privacy law and the executive director of public interest law firm National Security Counselors, told USA TODAY the idea that the law was broken "needs to die."

The law applied to "files lodged or officially filed with the government, agency, or court," McClanahan explained. Depriving the government of the use of the file would be illegal, he said, but not destroying a copy.

McClanahan argued Pelosi's actions would likely also be protected under the Speech or Debate Clause of the Constitution, which protects the speech of lawmakers on the floor of the House or Senate. That clause means "you cannot charge members of Congress for things they do on the floor, for the most part," he said.

Despite criticism from Republicans, Pelosi has remained defiant about her tearing up of the speech.

Want to talk more about politics?: Join our Facebook group: 'Across the Aisle, Across the Nation.'

Speaking at her weekly press conference yesterday, Pelosi told reporters it was "completely, entirely appropriate." to have torn up the speech.

Trump "shredded the truth in the speech, shredded the Constitution in his conduct, and so I shredded his state of mind address," she quipped.

Republicans introduced a resolution in the House to condemn her for her remarks, but the House voted along party lines to set the resolution aside later Thursday afternoon.

Contributing: John Fritze

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump: 'illegal' for Pelosi to tear up speech, but experts disagree


More Related News

Trump pushed CIA to find, kill Osama bin Laden
Trump pushed CIA to find, kill Osama bin Laden's son over higher priority targets

When the CIA gave Trump a list of major terror leaders to kill, he said he'd never heard of them but Instead focused on a target with a famous name, sources said.

Pelosi says she
Pelosi says she 'had no intention' to tear up Trump's State of the Union until she read it

Once she read through more of the speech, the speaker said she "realized that almost every page had something in it that was objectionable."

With tickets costing $580,600 per couple, Trump
With tickets costing $580,600 per couple, Trump's Saturday fundraiser will be his most expensive yet

If you want to attend President Trump's Saturday night fundraiser in Palm Beach, you'd better sell that old Renoir on the wall, quickly marry an oligarch, sell a kidney to a despot who really needs it, or ask Mike Bloomberg for a loan.The $580,600-per-couple event will be held at the beachfront

Michael Avenatti is convicted of trying to extort Nike
Michael Avenatti is convicted of trying to extort Nike

Michael Avenatti, the lawyer who gained fame by representing a porn star in lawsuits involving President Trump, was convicted of trying to extort sportswear giant Nike.

US won
US won't charge ex-FBI official McCabe, a Trump target
  • World
  • 2020-02-14 17:21:48Z

Federal prosecutors have declined to charge former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, closing an investigation into whether the longtime target of President Donald Trump's ire had lied to federal officials about his involvement in a news media disclosure, McCabe's legal team said Friday. The decision, coming at the end of a tumultuous week between the Justice Department and the White House, is likely to further agitate a president who has loudly complained that federal prosecutors have pursued cases against his allies but not against his perceived political enemies. The action resolves a criminal investigation that began nearly two years ago with a referral from the Justice Department's...

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply


Top News: Latin America