Trump's executive action on health care: Will it cut holes in Obamacare safety net?

  • In World
  • 2017-10-12 21:03:20Z
  • By Christian Science Monitor

What if health insurance were less comprehensive, but also cheaper?

That's a politically volatile question, and it gained some currency this week as President Trump signed an executive order designed to undercut Obamacare's premise that affordability shouldn't come at the price of less-than-full coverage for medical care.

The president can't remake America's health-care system with the stroke of a pen, but his action Thursday could allow more Americans to buy coverage that's outside the Affordable Care Act (ACA) rule book. Many conservatives say it's a modest step to expand consumer choice and put some downward pressure on health costs. Defenders of Obamacare say it's one more instance of Republicans undermining a law that, while not a fix-all, has been a win for average Americans.

Recommended: How much do you know about health-care reform? Take our quiz!

The executive order seeks to lighten regulation in one realm of the insurance market, called association health plans - potentially exempting them both from the ACA's mandates for "essential benefits" to be covered and from its rate protections for people with preexisting conditions. The order also seeks to expand the use of short-term medical plans, which are currently designed as stopgap coverage for just a few months.

An open question is how many such plans will become available and how many Americans will migrate to them. But, to the degree that Mr. Trump's new move draws people away from Obamacare's marketplaces, the result could be to push up premiums within those exchanges, since the bias will be for healthier people to depart and less-healthy people to remain. And it comes as Republicans are already facing criticism for undermining Obamacare even as the American public wants to shore it up.

"These association health plans ... enable healthy groups to band together and get lower premiums, which results in higher premiums for other groups," says Dan Mendelson, president of Avalere Health, a health-care consulting firm based in Washington.

"It's an invitation to cherry-pick [consumers] in the market," and that will be destabilizing, he says.


Trump signed the order in the aftermath of repeated failures of Congress's Republican majority to coalesce around legislation that would fulfill campaign promises to "repeal and replace" Obamacare.

Although not repealed, the law already faced headwinds, including Republican-led reductions in funding for "navigators" to help consumers shop for insurance on the exchanges.

More significant, Trump's statements have made insurers uncertain if some substantial subsidies will endure - a factor that analysts say has contributed to rising ACA premiums for the coming year. Many conservatives say those "cost-sharing reductions" to help low-income Americans were scheduled to be phased out anyway (while the ACA's central tax-credit subsidies will continue).

Premiums on the exchanges rose on average by double-digit rates for 2018, affecting some 7 percent of Americans, who are not enrolled in employer-based coverage, Medicare, or Medicaid. But an additional 9 percent of Americans are uninsured. Where a liberal solution is to bring more people into comprehensive care, many Republicans say this level of nonparticipation is a sign Obamacare is failing to deliver affordable insurance, and that consumer-driven reforms are the answer.

"Americans face a stark choice on what their health care will look like in the future," health-policy expert Robert Moffit of the conservative Heritage Foundation wrote in September.

Referring to rising calls by Democrats for a single-payer system, he said, "they can adopt a government-run health-care system, financed by new and heavy federal taxation, with federal officials making all the key decisions about medical benefits and services. Or, they can adopt a system in which individuals control health-care dollars and decisions, including the kinds of health plans, benefits, and treatments that best suit their needs."

The impact of the new executive order remains to be seen. It directs cabinet secretaries to consider changes that will require a months-long process including public comment and review of legal uncertainties. And then the actual uptake in the marketplace would be uncertain.

"A broader interpretation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) could potentially allow employers in the same line of business anywhere in the country to join together to offer healthcare coverage to their employees," the order said.

In remarks at the signing, Trump said the move "would open up additional options for employers to purchase the health plans their workers want."


Some conservative health-policy experts see the effort as a positive one for the health-care system, even if its scope is far short of a replacement for Obamacare.

Chris Pope of the Manhattan Institute says it may enable more small employers to offer insurance to their workers, as large employers typically do.

But he agrees with other analysts that the result would be to tilt the ACA customer base toward those who most need comprehensive plans. The result would be to push premiums up - and since those premiums are most often subsidized, much of the cost would fall on US taxpayers.

"Subsidies are going to continue to rise," says Mr. Mendelson of Avalere.

And higher-income purchasers of ACA insurance, who aren't eligible for subsidies, would see premiums rise faster than otherwise in this scenario.

With or without ripple effects from the executive order, members of Congress in both parties face voter pressure to address concerns about the Obamacare marketplaces. Not only have premiums been rising fast lately, but fewer insurers are offering plans, reducing competition even in many urban markets.

Steps to shore up the exchanges have already been the subject of some discussions across party lines, but broad partisan differences remain a formidable obstacle.

Read this story at

Become a part of the Monitor community


More Related News

White House says Trump isn
White House says Trump isn't considering firing Mueller

President Donald Trump is not considering firing the special counsel investigating Russian election interference, a top White House lawyer said, after a cascade of Trump tweets revived chatter that the ...

Trump Attacks McCabe, Comey And Mueller Probe In Sunday Tweet Barrage
Trump Attacks McCabe, Comey And Mueller Probe In Sunday Tweet Barrage

President Donald Trump once again attempted to dismantle the credibility of

Trump hails FBI official
Trump hails FBI official's firing, but critics call it 'dangerous'

Donald Trump has hailed the firing of a veteran FBI agent as a "great day for democracy," a move his attorney said he hoped would bring an end to a probe into alleged collusion between the president's campaign and Russia. McCabe, who was the FBI's deputy under former director James Comey, is a potentially key witness in the Russia probe.

Ex-CIA Boss John Brennan Tears Into Donald Trump Over Andrew McCabe Firing
Ex-CIA Boss John Brennan Tears Into Donald Trump Over Andrew McCabe Firing

Former CIA chief John Brennan did not mince his words when taking aim at

Trump lauds firing of ex-top FBI official as
Trump lauds firing of ex-top FBI official as 'great day'

Attorney General Jeff Sessions says he has fired Andrew McCabe, a former FBI deputy director who was a regular target of President Donald Trump's anger and criticism, just two days before McCabe's scheduled ...

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply


Top News: World

Hit "Like"
Don't miss any important news
Thanks, you don't need to show me this anymore.