TikTok sues Trump over threatened U.S. ban, calling it an election ploy




 

By Echo Wang and Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) - TikTok on Monday sued U.S. President Donald Trump over his executive order banning transactions in the United States with the popular short-form video-sharing app, calling it a pretext to fuel anti-China rhetoric as he seeks reelection.

TikTok and its parent ByteDance Ltd rejected what they called the White House's position that it was a national security threat, saying they had taken "extraordinary measures to protect the privacy and security of TikTok's U.S. user data."

They also called Trump's call in his Aug. 6 executive order for a TikTok ban a means to further his alleged "broader campaign of anti-China rhetoric" ahead of the Nov. 3 U.S. presidential election, where Trump is seeking a second term.

"We do not take suing the government lightly," TikTok said in a blog post. "But with the Executive Order threatening to bring a ban on our U.S. operations ... we simply have no choice."

The White House referred a request for comment to the U.S. Department of Justice, which had no immediate response.

TikTok and ByteDance are seeking a permanent injunction to block Trump from enforcing his Aug. 6 order.

The lawsuit filed in Los Angeles federal court names Trump, the U.S. Department of Commerce and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross as defendants.

Amid growing distrust between Washington and Beijing, Trump had for weeks complained that TikTok was a national security threat that might share information about users with the Chinese government.

His Aug. 6 executive order called for banning transactions with the app after 45 days.

Trump issued a separate executive order on Aug. 14 giving ByteDance 90 days to divest TikTok's U.S. operations and any data TikTok had gathered in the United States.

Reuters reported last week that TikTok had been preparing a legal challenge.

ByteDance had acquired Shanghai-based video app Musical.ly in a $1 billion transaction in 2017, and relaunched it as TikTok the following year.

TikTok said the Trump administration violated its constitutional right to due process by banning the company without notice.

It accused Trump of misusing the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which lets the president regulate international commerce during a national emergency.

Trump had in May 2019 invoked that law to stop alleged efforts by foreign telecommunications companies to conduct economic and industrial espionage against the United States.

The Trump administration have said Americans should be cautious in using TikTok. Under a law introduced in 2017 under President Xi Jinping, Chinese companies have an obligation to support and cooperate in China's national intelligence work.

But TikTok said Trump's Aug. 6 was not rooted in genuine national security concerns or supported by the emergency he had declared a year earlier.

It called the order "a gross misappropriation of IEEPA authority and a pretext for furthering the President's broader campaign of anti-China rhetoric in the run-up to the U.S. election."

ByteDance has been in talks to sell TikTok's North American, Australian and New Zealand operations to companies including Microsoft Corp and Oracle Corp.

Those assets could be worth $25 billion to $30 billion, people familiar with the matter have said.

Before buying TikTok, ByteDance had not sought advance approval from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, which reviews acquisitions for potential national security risks.

CFIUS later opened an investigation, and according to TikTok "repeatedly refused" to engage with ByteDance before saying it had found national security risks associated with the purchase.


(Reporting by Echo Wang and Jonathan Stempel in New York; additional reporting by Joshua Franklin in New York and Diane Bartz in Washington; Editing by Alistair Bell)

COMMENTS

More Related News

Trump declines to commit to peaceful transfer of power, drawing swift criticism on social media
Trump declines to commit to peaceful transfer of power, drawing swift criticism on social media

Trump's response to a question about whether he would commit to a peaceful transfer of power drew a firestorm of criticism on social media.

Trump: Major carmakers sue US government over China tax
Trump: Major carmakers sue US government over China tax

Tesla, Ford and Mercedes-Benz object to the Trump administration's import duties on Chinese parts.

JPMorgan set to pay nearly $1 billion in spoofing penalty - source
JPMorgan set to pay nearly $1 billion in spoofing penalty - source

The large fine would lift a regulatory shadow that has hung over the bank for several years and mark a signature victory for the government's efforts to clamp down on illegal trading techniques, such as spoofing, especially in the precious metals markets. JPMorgan has said in public filings https://jpmorganchaseco.gcs-web.com/node/338201/html that it was in discussions with authorities about resolving the investigations. The settlement with the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) could come as soon as this week and is not expected to result in any restrictions on the bank's business, the person said.

Gilead to pay $97 million to settle U.S. kickback probe
Gilead to pay $97 million to settle U.S. kickback probe

Gilead Sciences Inc has agreed to pay $97 million to resolve U.S. government claims it used a purportedly independent charity to pay illegal kickbacks to cover Medicare patients' out-of-pocket costs for its pulmonary arterial hypertension drug Letairis. The U.S. Department of Justice said on Wednesday the settlement resolves allegations that Gilead improperly used the Caring Voice Coalition as a conduit to cover thousands of patients' co-payment obligations. "Gilead used data from CVC that it knew it should not have, and effectively set up a proprietary fund within CVC to cover the co-pays of just its own drug," U.S. Attorney Andrew Lelling in Boston said in a statement.

Acting DHS secretary: White supremacy is
Acting DHS secretary: White supremacy is 'most persistent and lethal threat' internally to US

"White supremacist extremists, from a lethality standpoint over the last two years, particularly when you look at 2018 and 2019, are certainly the most persistent and lethal threat when we talk about domestic violent extremists," said Wolf.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

  • tiktok takipçi satın al
    (2020-08-25 00:14:21Z)

    TikTok Profilinizi büyütmek için size özel, Profil Takipçi Paketlerimizden Satın Alabilirsiniz. Sizi diğer hesaplardan ayırarak öne çıkaracaktır. 1000 Takipçiye ulaşıp canlı yayınlardan gelir elde etmeye başlayabilirsiniz. Canlı yayın açmak için en az 1000 takipçiniz olması gerekiyor.

    REPLY
  • word unscrambler
    (2020-08-25 09:45:56Z)

    i like this post

    REPLY

Top News: Economy