The Latest: Alaska justices hear youth climate lawsuit




  • In US
  • 2019-10-09 23:41:31Z
  • By Associated Press
The Latest: Alaska justices hear youth climate lawsuit
The Latest: Alaska justices hear youth climate lawsuit  

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) - The Latest on an Alaska Supreme Court hearing on an appeal involving a climate change lawsuit filed by state youths (all times local):

3:30 p.m.

A lawyer representing 16 Alaska youths told the state Supreme Court his clients have a constitutional right to a healthy environment.

Attorney Andrew Welle told justices Wednesday that climate change is already damaging the lives of his clients and will have serious long-term consequences unless changes are made.

He asked justices to render invalid a state law that says fossil fuel development is an official state policy.

Assistant Attorney General Anna Jay told justices that the courtroom is not the place to decide state policy on greenhouse gas emissions.

She asked justices to affirm rulings in previous cases concluding that courts don't have tools such as public hearings to formulate a policy.

Justice Daniel Winfree did not specify when the court will issue a written opinion.

___

12:01 a.m.

Attorneys for 16 young Alaskans who sued over state climate change policy are expected to argue their case before Alaska Supreme Court justices on Wednesday.

The lawsuit says state policy that promotes fossil fuels violates the constitutional right of young Alaskans to a safe climate.

The lawsuit says human-caused climate change will be catastrophic unless atmospheric carbon dioxide declines.

Among the damages it lists are increasing temperatures, changing rain and snow patterns, rising seas, storm-surge flooding, thawing permafrost, coast erosion and increased wildfires.

A judge ruled against the youths a year ago.

Anchorage Superior Court Judge Gregory Miller cited previous cases that concluded the courts lack scientific, economic and technological resources that agencies can use to determine climate policy and it was best left in their hands.

COMMENTS

More Related News

Supreme Court is faulted for shielding police officers from excessive-force claims
Supreme Court is faulted for shielding police officers from excessive-force claims
  • US
  • 2020-06-04 11:00:50Z

Supreme Court has shielded police from being sued for using excessive force. Now it's under pressure to reverse course.

Sentenced to life as teens, they fear getting coronavirus before getting a second chance
Sentenced to life as teens, they fear getting coronavirus before getting a second chance
  • US
  • 2020-06-03 10:27:25Z

The Supreme Court gave "juvenile lifers" a shot at freedom. Many are still waiting, even as COVID-19 spreads.

Congressional Action Is the Best Way to Fix Qualified Immunity
Congressional Action Is the Best Way to Fix Qualified Immunity

As cities across the country descend into chaos in response to a clear case of police misconduct, there's a lot of pressure on the Supreme Court to reconsider a doctrine known as "qualified immunity."Under federal law, police officers who infringe on civilians' constitutional rights can be sued in federal court, but the qualified-immunity doctrine shields them from such suits unless their actions violated "clearly established law." In other words, plaintiffs have to show not only that their rights were violated, but also that the officer's conduct had been addressed in similar previous cases and found to be unconstitutional. If no previous case involving the disputed conduct exists, as...

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: US