Supreme Court to decide if Congress can get secret Russia grand jury materials




  • In Politics
  • 2020-07-02 14:47:13Z
  • By USA TODAY
Supreme Court to decide if Congress can get secret Russia grand jury materials
Supreme Court to decide if Congress can get secret Russia grand jury materials  

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court agreed Thursday to consider blocking Congress' access to secret grand jury materials from the probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

The action was a victory for the Trump administration, which is fighting to keep a House committee controlled by Democrats from obtaining material it says could lead to another impeachment inquiry.

The immediate significance is that any decision almost surely will come after the presidential election, a blow to House Democrats in pursuing a potential obstruction of justice charge against President Donald Trump in a possible second impeachment inquiry. The case likely will be heard by the high court in the fall or winter and decided in 2021.

House Democrats and the Justice Department have been locked in a legal battle over grand jury testimony gathered during former special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation. In March, a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., ruled that the House Judiciary Committee is entitled to the evidence.

The committee contended that the grand jury material is "central" to its inquiry into possible obstruction of justice by Trump and could reveal new evidence of impeachable offenses. If so, the panel said it will consider recommending new articles of impeachment.

In December, the House approved two articles of impeachment against the president. One accused Trump of abusing his power by withholding military aid in order to pressure Ukraine to announce investigations into a political rival. The second accused him of obstructing Congress by stonewalling its subpoenas for documents and testimony. In February, Trump was acquitted by the Senate.

But in January, House general counsel Douglas Letter told the appeals court that new impeachment articles were a possibility, pending a review of the grand jury evidence.

"That is on the table; there is no doubt," Letter told the court.

The Justice Department argued that House Democrats are not entitled to grand jury evidence because they have not said which specific testimony they need or how it would help their investigation. Solicitor General Noel Francisco wrote that the House has no "urgent need of the requested materials for a hypothetical second impeachment."

At issue before the high court is a more basic legal question: Is a Senate impeachment trial a judicial proceeding? The lower court ruled that it is, saying the Framers of the Constitution understood impeachment to involve the exercise of judicial power.

A separate but related House subpoena seeks testimony from former White House counsel Donald McGahn, a key witness on possible obstruction by Trump. The Trump administration has blocked McGahn from testifying, saying Congress can't force high-ranking presidential aides to testify.

In February, a three-judge appeals court panel ruled that McGahn does not have to testify, saying the judiciary can't be an "ombudsman" who resolves disputes between the executive and legislative branches of government. The full appeals court reheard the case in April but has yet to rule.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Supreme Court will decide if Democrats get Russia grand jury material

COMMENTS

More Related News

Trump signs order to expand access to telehealth services in rural areas
Trump signs order to expand access to telehealth services in rural areas
  • US
  • 2020-08-03 23:30:44Z

U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday signed an executive order expanding access to telehealth services for 57 million Americans in under-served rural areas and elsewhere, after virtual visits soared during the coronavirus pandemic. Trump, who is counting on votes from backers in rural areas in the 2020 presidential election, said the new order would ensure that telehealth services expanded during the pandemic remained in place even after the public health emergency ended.

Trump weighs executive action as negotiations progress on next coronavirus stimulus package
Trump weighs executive action as negotiations progress on next coronavirus stimulus package

The president on Monday said he was weighing executive action as Congress and the White House struggle to break the impasse.

Where Is Trump
Where Is Trump's Health Care Plan?

In an interview with "Fox News Sunday" host Chris Wallace on July 19, President Trump said that he would be "signing a health-care plan within two weeks, a full and complete health-care plan." Two weeks have come and gone and Trump hasn't released let alone signed a "full and complete health-care plan," of course. There's no indication that the administration has such a comprehensive plan.Trump reiterated that a plan was coming in an exchange with reporters on Friday, The Washington Post reports: "We're going to be doing a health-care plan. We're going to be doing a very inclusive health-care plan. I'll be signing it sometime very soon," he said. When a reporter noted Trump's earlier...

Trump threatens lawsuit to block mail-in voting in Nevada
Trump threatens lawsuit to block mail-in voting in Nevada

State lawmakers have approved a bill to automatically send mail-in ballots to voters.

Microsoft to continue talks to buy TikTok from ByteDance
Microsoft to continue talks to buy TikTok from ByteDance

The company made the statement following a conversation between is CEO Satya Nadella and U.S. President Donald Trump. It said it would ensure that all private data of TikTok's American users is transferred to and remains in the United States.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Politics