Supreme Court strikes down consumer agency's autonomy in win for Trump administration




Supreme Court strikes down consumer agency\
Supreme Court strikes down consumer agency\'s autonomy in win for Trump administration  

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court handed the Trump administration a big win Monday in its effort to tame the independent consumer agency created in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis.

The justices ruled 5-4 that Congress impinged too much on presidential authority by requiring that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's director can be removed only because of inefficiency, neglect or malfeasance.

Chief Justice John Roberts authored the opinion and was joined by the court's other four conservative justices. The four liberal justices dissented.

The case was one of the biggest on the high court's docket, not only because of the agency's powers but as a major test of the separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches of government.

Conservatives have argued for years that presidents must have the ability to hire and fire top officials at will. During oral argument in March, Solicitor General Noel Francisco said that otherwise, a future president could get saddled with a predecessor's Cabinet.

But one of Francisco's predecessors as the government's top Supreme Court litigator, Paul Clement, said it made sense for Congress to protect some officials from politics. As an example, he said lawmakers might rightfully insulate the head of the Centers for Disease Control from interference, the better to protect Americans during a pandemic.

The case also took on political overtones because the agency, created under President Barack Obama, was the brainchild of Elizabeth Warren before she won election to the Senate and became, for a time, a leading contender for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination.

The consumer agency was created by the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act in order to regulate banks and credit institutions. To guard its independence, it was designed to have a single director removable during five-year terms only for "inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office."

Two federal appeals courts upheld the structure of the bureau. The full U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit did so in 2018, but with a vehement dissent from Brett Kavanaugh before his confirmation to the Supreme Court.

"Independent agencies collectively constitute, in effect, a headless fourth branch of the U.S. government," Kavanaugh wrote. "Because of their massive power and the absence of presidential supervision and direction, independent agencies pose a significant threat to individual liberty and to the constitutional system of separation of powers and checks and balances."

The Supreme Court originally upheld the constitutionality of independent agencies in 1935, but critics contended that precedent only protects those with multiple commissioners or board members, not single directors.

The Obama administration and the bureau's first director, Richard Cordray, opposed any change to the agency's structure. But Trump and the bureau's current director, Kathleen Kraninger, disagreed.

Seila Law, which helps consumers in debt, brought the original challenge following a CFPB investigation. Its lawyer, Kannon Shanmugam, called the agency's structure "unprecedented and unconstitutional."

But Roberts worried during oral argument about setting a new standard, somewhere between independence and subservience, that could lead to more court cases. That, he said, "would be the worst of all possible worlds."

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Supreme Court says consumer agency head can be removed without cause

COMMENTS

More Related News

Jeff Sessions appears to refer to Black Harvard scholar as "some criminal"
Jeff Sessions appears to refer to Black Harvard scholar as "some criminal"
  • US
  • 2020-07-02 20:49:04Z

In an interview, Sessions criticized former President Barack Obama for having "a beer at the White House with some criminal."

Supreme Court to decide if Congress can get secret Russia grand jury materials
Supreme Court to decide if Congress can get secret Russia grand jury materials

A House committee controlled by Democrats wants to see secret documents that it says could lead to another impeachment inquiry.

Joe Biden tops Donald Trump in fundraising for second straight month
Joe Biden tops Donald Trump in fundraising for second straight month

Donald Trump still likely has a significant cash-on-hand advantage heading into the final four months of the election.

Justices keep hold on secret Russia investigation material
Justices keep hold on secret Russia investigation material
  • World
  • 2020-07-02 13:42:16Z

The Supreme Court is denying Congress access to secret grand jury testimony from special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation through the November election. The justices agreed on Thursday to hear the Trump administration's appeal of a lower court order for the material to be turned over to the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives. Arguments themselves might not even take place before Americans decide whether to give President Donald Trump a second term.

In legal setback, U.S. judge strikes down Trump asylum restrictions
In legal setback, U.S. judge strikes down Trump asylum restrictions
  • US
  • 2020-07-01 14:49:50Z

A U.S. federal judge late Tuesday struck down President Donald Trump's hardline rule that curtailed asylum applications by migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border, a legal setback that follows a recent Supreme Court defeat over another immigration policy. The administration failed to adhere to proper regulatory guidelines when it issued a fast-track rule requiring migrants who want asylum to first seek safe haven in a third country through which they traveled on their way to the United States, said U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly, a Trump appointee based in Washington, D.C.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Asia