Supreme Court focuses on repeal of New York City gun restrictions that could moot Second Amendment case




Supreme Court focuses on repeal of New York City gun restrictions that could moot Second Amendment  case
Supreme Court focuses on repeal of New York City gun restrictions that could moot Second Amendment case  

WASHINGTON - The most significant Second Amendment case to reach the Supreme Court in nearly a decade appeared to fizzle somewhat Monday as the justices focused on whether a restriction's repeal makes the issue moot.

Chief Justice John Roberts and a silent Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh emerged as the likely wild cards in the debate over a New York City rule on transporting legally owned guns that has been replaced.

Because the city no longer blocks firearms owners from taking their guns to shooting ranges or second homes outside the city, the court's four liberal justices seemed inclined to declare the case closed. But several conservative justices said it remains unclear what's allowed and what is not.

"They didn't get all that they wanted," Associate Justice Samuel Alito said in reference to the gun owners who brought the case. While coffee and bathroom breaks apparently are allowed en route to specified locations outside city limits, he said, "It must be a direct trip. It can't include an hour spent with your mother."

The court's liberal justices said that's a question for another day. As things stand now, Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor said, "the other side has thrown in the towel."

"You're asking us to opine on a law that's not on the books anymore," Sotomayor said.

Earlier: Court may expand Second Amendment rights despite repeal of disputed gun restrictions

While the New York City rule was an outlier among gun control restrictions, the high court's willingness to hear the case signaled the potential for a blockbuster ruling that extends gun rights outside the home, or one that makes local and state limitations harder to justify.

Both Paul Clement, the lawyer for the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, and Jeffrey Wall, the Justice Department's principal deputy solicitor general, began their turns at the lectern by citing "text, history and tradition" to defend Second Amendment rights. Wall said lower courts have used that to give "thumbs up" to restrictions.

The "text, history and tradition" phrase is one that Kavanaugh used as a federal appeals court judge when dissenting from a ruling that upheld the District of Columbia's ban on semi-automatic rifles and its firearms registration requirements. That seemed to indicate he would favor expanding gun rights, but his position on whether the new case remains ripe was unclear Monday.

If the court declares the case moot, there are more cases in the pipeline, including challenges to permitting requirements for carrying firearms in public in New Jersey and parts of Massachusetts. A federal appeals court struck down Washington, D.C., restrictions in 2017, creating a split among lower courts that eventually may get the Supreme Court's attention.

Backed by the National Rifle Association and the Trump administration, the challengers to New York's abandoned restrictions are hoping the high court takes a stand this time. That would give them a chance to win the biggest Second Amendment victory since landmark rulings a decade ago affirmed the right to keep guns at home for self-defense.

Since its 2008 and 2010 rulings striking down gun restrictions in the District of Columbia and Chicago, the court has refused to hear dozens of cases challenging lesser limits on who can own what types of guns, where they can be taken, what requirements must be met and more. During that time, lower courts have resolved more than 1,000 Second Amendment cases, upholding many gun control measures.

New York City's rule barred licensed handgun owners from taking their guns beyond its five boroughs, even to second homes or shooting ranges. Federal district and appeals courts upheld the 18-year-old rule.

Gun control groups such as Brady, Everytown for Gun Safety and the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence lobbied for the city and state to eliminate the rule rather than test it at the more conservative Supreme Court. They feared a decision that would expand public carry rights elsewhere, including to nine states that give law enforcement officials discretion to deny licenses: California, New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Maryland, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Delaware and Hawaii.

Rather than fight it out in court, the city repealed the rule, and the state replaced it with a statute that permits the previously banned transportation of firearms. But Clement argued that the city could reinstate the restrictions, while gun owners still could be at risk for past violations and for what Alito called "non-direct" transporting of firearms.

Wall, representing the federal government, raised a different reason to keep the case alive: protecting gun owners' right to seek damages for prior restrictions.

Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch cited "a delta of relief that's been denied" and wondered why the case should not be allowed to go forward "despite Herculean, late-breaking efforts" to have it removed from the docket.

Roberts, who has become the court's most likely swing vote following last year's retirement of Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy, asked New York City's lawyer, Richard Dearing, whether declaring the case moot would harm gun owners in any way.

Dearing's answer: No.

Asked Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: "What's left of this case?"

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Second Amendment: Supreme Court focuses on repeal of New York City law

COMMENTS

More Related News

'Incredibly Powerful': Eleventh Day of George Floyd Protests Is the Biggest Yet

Despite police crackdowns, curfews, boiling heat, rain, and fears of a global pandemic that continues to plague America, huge crowds of protesters swelled to their largest size yet on Saturday in some of the country's biggest cities.On the eleventh day of protests-sparked by the killing of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police-tens of thousands of demonstrators descended on Union Park in Chicago, downtown Philadelphia, New York City, San Francisco, Seattle, Brooklyn, and Washington, D.C., where huge gatherings took on a festival-like air.It provided a jarring contrast to footage of hundreds of police officers cheering outside a Buffalo, NY, courthouse on Saturday, in support of...

An angry nation prepares for a weekend of protests over George Floyd
An angry nation prepares for a weekend of protests over George Floyd's death
  • US
  • 2020-06-06 02:44:22Z

Daily demonstrations against police attacks on black men show little sign of abating.

Chris Hayes Slams Cuomo and de Blasio for Trying to
Chris Hayes Slams Cuomo and de Blasio for Trying to 'Gaslight the Public' on Cops Beating Protesters

MSNBC host Chris Hayes took New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio and New York Governor Andrew Cuomo to task on Thursday night for falsely claiming that New York police hadn't beaten protesters despite video evidence to the contrary.In recent days, several videos have surfaced on social media showing NYPD officers whacking peaceful protesters with batons, including a "horrifying" viral clip of three officers bludgeoning a cyclist on Wednesday night. The latter video prompted widespread outrage-except from the governor and mayor.Noting that Wednesday night's New York protest over George Floyd's death devolved into violence because "the NYPD started beating people," Hayes went on to highlight...

New York Cops Beat Protesters for Crime of Being There
New York Cops Beat Protesters for Crime of Being There

Peaceful protests in New York took a dark turn late Thursday as graphic video emerged of an elderly man being knocked to the ground by police in Buffalo and protesters in New York City were confronted with swarms of police officers using heavy-handed tactics to enforce a statewide 8 p.m. curfew. The shocking incident in Buffalo's Niagara Square occurred outside City Hall, where video posted by local media shows the man approaching police as they attempt to clear the square only to be violently shoved. He then falls backwards and slams his head into the ground, left seemingly unconscious as protesters can be heard screaming "he's bleeding out of his ear." Buffalo police later released a...

Immigrants anxious as they await Supreme Court DACA decision
Immigrants anxious as they await Supreme Court DACA decision
  • World
  • 2020-06-04 20:46:28Z

The immigrant rights activist who's shielded from deportation and allowed to legally work in the U.S. under an Obama-era program sets a 6 a.m. alarm so she's alert when the latest Supreme Court decision may be posted online about an hour later. Montoya, like 650,000 others enrolled in the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, is waiting for the justices to release their decision on President Donald Trump's attempt to end the protections. "My gut hurts," said Montoya, 29, who is originally from Mexico but has grown up in the Phoenix area.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Latin America