Sinema took Wall Street money while killing tax on investors




  • In Business
  • 2022-08-14 18:22:02Z
  • By LA Times
Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), center, joined by Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), left, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) speak to reporters at the Capitol in Washington on July 28, 2021. Sinema received a $1-million surge of campaign cash over the past year from private equity professionals, hedge funds and venture capitalists whose interests she has staunchly defended in Congress, according to an Associated Press review of campaign finance disclosures. (J. Scott Applewhite / Associated Press)
Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), center, joined by Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), left, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) speak to reporters at the Capitol in Washington on July 28, 2021. Sinema received a $1-million surge of campaign cash over the past year from private equity professionals, hedge funds and venture capitalists whose interests she has staunchly defended in Congress, according to an Associated Press review of campaign finance disclosures. (J. Scott Applewhite / Associated Press)  

Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, the Arizona Democrat who single-handedly thwarted her party's longtime goal of raising taxes on wealthy investors, received nearly $1 million over the last year from private equity professionals, hedge fund managers and venture capitalists whose taxes would have increased under the plan.

For years, Democrats have promised to raise taxes on such investors, who pay a significantly lower rate on their earnings than ordinary workers. But just as they closed in on that goal last week, Sinema forced a series of changes to her party's $740-billion election-year spending package, eliminating a proposed "carried interest" tax increase on private equity earnings while securing a $35-billion exemption that will spare much of the industry from a separate tax increase other huge corporations now have to pay.

The bill, with Sinema's alterations intact, was given final approval by Congress on Friday and is expected to be signed by President Biden this coming week.

Sinema has long aligned herself with the interests of private equity, hedge funds and venture capital, helping her net at least $1.5 million in campaign contributions since she was elected to the House a decade ago. But the $983,000 she has collected since last summer more than doubled what the industry donated to her during all of her preceding years in Congress combined, according to an Associated Press review of campaign finances disclosures.

The donations, which make Sinema one of the industry's top beneficiaries in Congress, serve as a reminder of the way that high-power lobbying campaigns can have dramatic implications for the way legislation is crafted, particularly in the evenly divided Senate where there are no Democratic votes to spare. They also highlight a degree of political risk for Sinema, whose unapologetic defense of the industry's favorable tax treatment is viewed by many in her party as indefensible.

"From their vantage point, it's a million dollars very well spent," said Dean Baker, a senior economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a liberal-leaning think tank. "It's pretty rare you see this direct of a return on your investment. So I guess I would congratulate them."

Sinema's office declined to make her available for an interview. Hannah Hurley, a Sinema spokesperson, acknowledged the senator shares some of the industry's views on taxation, but rebuffed any suggestion that the donations influenced her thinking.

"Senator Sinema makes every decision based on one criteria: what's best for Arizona," Hurley said in a statement. "She has been clear and consistent for over a year that she will only support tax reforms and revenue options that support Arizona's economic growth and competitiveness."

Sinema's defense of the tax provisions offers a jarring contrast to her background as a Green Party activist and self-styled "Prada socialist" who once likened accepting campaign cash to "bribery" and later called for "big corporations & the rich to pay their fair share" shortly before launching her first campaign for Congress in 2012.

She's been far more magnanimous since, praising private equity in 2016 from the House floor for providing "billions of dollars each year to Main Street businesses" and later interning at a private equity mogul's boutique winery in Northern California during the 2020 congressional recess.

The surge in contributions from the industry to Sinema trace back to last summer. That's when she first made clear that she wouldn't support a carried interest tax increase, as well as other corporate and business tax increases, included in an earlier iteration of Biden's agenda.

During a two-week period in September alone, Sinema collected $47,100 in contributions from 16 high-ranking officials from the private equity firm Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe, records show. Employees and executives of KKR, another private equity behemoth, contributed $44,100 to Sinema during a two-month span in late 2021.

In some cases, the families of private equity managers joined in. David Belluck, a partner at the firm Riverside Partners, gave a $5,800 max-out contribution to Sinema one day in late June. So did three of his college-age kids, with the family collectively donating $23,200, records show.

"I generally support centrist Democrats and her seat is important to keep a Democratic Senate majority," Belluck said, adding that his family has known Sinema since her election to Congress. "She and I have never discussed private equity taxation."

The donations from the industry coincide with a $26-million lobbying effort spearheaded by the investment firm Blackstone that culminated on the Senate floor last weekend. By the time the bill was up for debate during a marathon series of votes, Sinema had already forced Democrats to abandon their carried interest tax increase.

"Senator Sinema said she would not vote for the bill ... unless we took it out," Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer told reporters last week. "We had no choice."

But after private equity lobbyists discovered a provision in the bill that would have subjected many of them to a separate 15% corporate minimum tax, they urgently pressed Sinema and other centrist Democrats for changes, according to emails as well as four people with direct knowledge of the matter who requested anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.

"Given the breaking nature of this development we need as many offices as possible weighing in with concerns to Leader Schumer's office," Blackstone lobbyist Ryan McConaghy wrote in an email Aug. 6 obtained by the AP, which included proposed language for modifying the bill. "Would you and your boss be willing to raise the alarm on this and express concerns with Schumer and team?"

McConaghy did not respond to a request for comment.

Sinema worked with Republicans on an amendment that stripped the corporate tax increase provisions from the bill, which a handful of vulnerable Democrats also voted for.

Liberal activists in Arizona say they plan to make Sinema's reliance on donations from wealthy investors a campaign issue when she is up for reelection in 2024.

This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

COMMENTS

More Related News

Shutdown threat grows as lawmakers struggle to reach final deal
Shutdown threat grows as lawmakers struggle to reach final deal

The heat is dialing up on Congress to quickly strike an agreement on government funding as lawmakers stare down a critical deadline to avert a shutdown at...

Bills would curtail objections at future Jan. 6 counts
Bills would curtail objections at future Jan. 6 counts
  • US
  • 2022-09-26 04:03:18Z

Members of Congress have officially objected to the results in four of the last six presidential elections, a partisan practice that has been legal for over ...

Biden
Biden's mixed record forces some Dems into odd balancing act
  • World
  • 2022-09-26 04:02:07Z

Democratic House candidate Greg Landsman can tick off how his party's control of Congress and the White House has benefited his city. The bipartisan...

Congress discusses how to fix price hikes across the nation
Congress discusses how to fix price hikes across the nation

Byrd said she does not care about the politics behind the price hikes - she just wants lawmakers to fix it.

Fights over political lines have fueled the aging of America
Fights over political lines have fueled the aging of America's government. But that may be changing.

Older members of Congress have long held the upper hand when redistricting pits them against a colleague. But partisanship is changing the game.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Business