Leonard got a max contract to play in Southern California, where he grew up and clearly wanted to return. He'll also be joined by his desired co-star, Paul George.
The Clippers get both stars and early status as championship favorite.
But the process has left some bitterness with the teams that didn't get Leonard.
The Raptors have spread word Leonard's advisor and uncle, Dennis Robertson, made unreasonable requests. The Lakers reportedly feel they got played in their Leonard pursuit.
This chatter is designed to make both Robertson and the Clippers look bad.
Robertson is painted as greedy and preposterous. The Collective Bargaining Agreement prohibits teams from providing players with those types of special benefits. In fact, a team arranging a sponsorship for its player is specifically listed as salary-cap circumvention.
Still, I don't have a huge problem with Robertson asking. There have been numerous suspicions of under-the-table payments. If that happens regularly, of course Leonard should want his cut. If that's not really something that happens, it's on the teams to say no.
But did teams say no?
This raises questions about what the Clippers did to lure Leonard. They reportedly looked into acquiring his logo from Nike so they could gift it to him contingent on him signing. (That didn't happen, and lawsuits between Leonard and Nike are pending). They also previously got fined for arranging a sponsorship for DeAndre Jordan when he was a free agent.
If there's credible suspicion or even just accusations from other teams, the NBA should investigate. But people should put their names behinds their accusations - at the very least to the league.
Without that, this just looks like sour grapes.