Padma Lakshmi pens NYT essay on being raped at 16: 'I have nothing to gain by talking about this'




 

Amid an ongoing discussion about Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, Padma Lakshmi put pen to paper to publicly detail the rape she kept quiet until now.

In a revealing opinion piece for the New York Times, Lakshmi reflects on being raped by a 23-year-old man when she was a virgin at 16. The two had been seeing each other for a few months when the incident occurred.

"When we went out, he would park the car and come in and sit on our couch and talk to my mother. He never brought me home late on a school night," Lakshmi recalls of the early days of the relationship. "We were intimate to a point, but he knew that I was a virgin and that I was unsure of when I would be ready to have sex."

After a few months of courtship, the two were hanging out on New Year's Eve when she fell asleep.

"The next thing I remember is waking up to a very sharp stabbing pain like a knife blade between my legs. He was on top of me," Lakshmi writes, adding that she verbally protested and told him to stop. "Afterward,he said, 'I thought it would hurt less if you were asleep.' Then he drove me home."

While she notes that it "doesn't matter" one way or the other, Lakshmi notes that she was not drunk and was not wearing revealing clothing. She did not report the incident to family, friends or authorities: "That evening, I let my mother know when I was home, then went to sleep, hoping to forget that night."

In reference to Kavanaugh, who is accused by three women of sexual assault, Lakshmi writes, "Some say a man shouldn't pay a price for an act he committed as a teenager. But the woman pays the price for the rest of her life, and so do the people who love her."

Read her full essay in the New York Times here.

COMMENTS

More Related News

Supreme Court to Decide If Anti-LGBT Discrimination Is Already Illegal
Supreme Court to Decide If Anti-LGBT Discrimination Is Already Illegal

REUTERSIs anti-LGBT discrimination a form of sex discrimination?That is what the Supreme Court said Monday it will decide next fall, when it hears three cases on anti-LGBT discrimination in the workplace.  And with Justice Kavanaugh having replaced Justice Kennedy, the outcome is totally unknown.First, let's remember what these cases are not about.  They are not about whether it's a good thing to fire someone for being gay or trans.  In fact, a whopping 69% of Americans say it should be against the law to do so.The trouble is, it isn't.  In fact, under federal law, and in 14 states, it is perfectly legal for my boss to say "Wait a minute-you're gay?!  You're fired."  That is exactly what...

Supreme Court takes up major gay, transgender job discrimination cases
Supreme Court takes up major gay, transgender job discrimination cases
  • US
  • 2019-04-22 14:26:40Z

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to decide whether U.S. law banning workplace discrimination on the basis of sex protects gay and transgender workers, as the conservative-majority court waded into a fierce dispute involving a divisive social issue. At issue in the high-profile legal fight is whether gay and transgender people are covered by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of sex as well as race, color, national origin and religion. The court will take up two cases concerning gay people who have said they were fired due to their sexual orientation, one involving a New York skydiving instructor named...

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Entertainment

facebook
Hit "Like"
Don't miss any important news
Thanks, you don't need to show me this anymore.