'OK, boomer!' Supreme Court hands partial victory to federal worker claiming age discrimination

\'OK, boomer!\' Supreme Court hands partial victory to federal worker claiming age discrimination  

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court ruled Monday that federal workers may be able to win some relief for age discrimination even if it was not the sole reason for action taken against them.

The case, involving a clinical pharmacist at the Department of Veterans Affairs, won attention after Chief Justice John Roberts asked whether the phrase "OK, boomer" would qualify as age discrimination.

In an 8-1 decision, Associate Justice Samuel Alito said a 1967 federal law "demands that personnel actions be untainted by any consideration of age." That means Noris Babb is eligible for some form of remedy because of what she claimed was a hostile work environment.

But the court ruled that overturning an employer's ultimate action and winning complete relief still requires proof that age was the key factor.

"Plaintiffs who demonstrate only that they were subjected to unequal consideration cannot obtain reinstatement, back pay, compensatory damages, or other forms of relief related to the end result of an employment decision," Alito wrote.

Babb, a clinical pharmacist at the VA, sued the department over a series of decisions that affected her job duties, pay and opportunities for promotions.

During oral argument, Roberts asked Babb's lawyer whether a younger hiring manager saying "OK, boomer" would be an actionable offense. His question drew laughter in the courtroom.

"If the decision-makers are sitting around the table and they say, 'we've got Candidate A who's 35' and 'we've got Candidate B who's 55 and is a boomer' and is probably tired and, you know, doesn't have a lot of computer skills, I think that absolutely would be actionable," attorney Roman Martinez responded.

"OK, boomer" has become a biting slogan younger generations have used on platforms like TikTok and Twitter to express resentment toward older people, invoking the name of the baby boom generation.

The case revolved around whether federal workers can claim age bias under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967.

Associate Justice Clarence Thomas dissented because, he said, the decision allows workers to claim age discrimination even if they ultimately are hired or promoted.

Contributing: Savannah Behrmann

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: 'OK, boomer!' Supreme Court says aging federal workers have legal sway


More Related News

Supreme Court upholds Puerto Rico
Supreme Court upholds Puerto Rico's financial oversight board

The decision comes in response to a legal challenge by hedge funds who questioned the composition of the board's members.

U.S. Supreme Court upholds Puerto Rico financial oversight board appointments
U.S. Supreme Court upholds Puerto Rico financial oversight board appointments
  • US
  • 2020-06-01 14:25:06Z

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday upheld appointments to Puerto Rico's federally created financial oversight board that had been challenged by creditors in a ruling that avoids disruption to the panel's restructuring of about $120 billion of the bankrupt U.S. territory's debt. The justices, in a 9-0 decision authored by Justice Stephen Breyer, concluded that the 2016 appointment of seven board members did not violate the U.S. Constitution's so-called appointments clause as the challengers had argued. The outcome hinged on the court's conclusion that the board has control primarily over local issues, meaning the appointments were valid under the Constitution's language regarding naming...

Supreme Court upholds Puerto Rico financial oversight board
Supreme Court upholds Puerto Rico financial oversight board

The Supreme Court on Monday upheld the oversight board established by Congress to help Puerto Rico out of a devastating financial crisis that has been exacerbated by the coronavirus outbreak, recent earthquakes and damage from Hurricane Maria in 2017. In a unanimous holding, the court will allow the oversight board's work to pull the island out of the largest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history to proceed. At one point, Puerto Rico faced more than $100 billion in debt and unfunded pension obligations.

Trump faces election risks in looming Supreme Court ruling on
Trump faces election risks in looming Supreme Court ruling on 'Dreamers'
  • US
  • 2020-06-01 11:06:51Z

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision expected in the coming weeks on the fate of the young immigrants known as "Dreamers" could cause an election-year headache for President Donald Trump - even if he wins the legal battle. The Republican president in 2017 sought to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program created by his Democratic predecessor Barack Obama in 2012, but his move was blocked by lower courts. Trump is seeking re-election on Nov. 3.

Senate Democrats
Senate Democrats' Mindless 'Report' on the Judiciary

NRPLUS MEMBER ARTICLE T hree months ago, Senator Chuck Schumer stood outside the Supreme Court building and warned Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh that they would "pay the price" and would "not know what hit" them if they upheld a Louisiana law requiring abortion clinics to have admitting privileges at a local hospital. Last week, that same Chuck Schumer and two other Democratic senators released a 54-page broadside against their Republican colleagues titled "Captured Courts: The GOP's Big Money Assault on the Constitution, Our Independent Judiciary, and the Rule of Law."If Senator Schumer is concerned about the integrity of the Constitution and the independence of the judiciary,...

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply


Top News: Latin America