'No expiration date on equality': House breathes life into Equal Rights Amendment for women

  • In Business
  • 2020-02-13 21:11:33Z
\'No expiration date on equality\': House breathes life into Equal Rights Amendment for women  

WASHINGTON - The House of Representatives voted Thursday to remove the 1982 deadline for ratifying the Equal Rights Amendment for women, a move that is mostly symbolic as the Senate is not likely to follow suit and the ability of Congress to change the deadline has not been tested in the courts.

The House resolution was supported by five Republicans: John Curtis of Utah, Rodney Davis of Illinois, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Tom Reed of New York and Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey. No Democrat voted against the measure.

The 232-183 vote came weeks after Virginia became the 38th - and potentially pivotal - state to ratify the amendment.

But that came decades after the ratification deadline set by Congress when the amendment was coming close to passage in the 1970s.

"There can be no expiration date on equality," Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., the lead sponsor of the resolution, argued on the House floor.

In addition to the legal uncertainty, the amendment faces opposition from anti-abortion groups who say it would lead to the removal of restrictions on abortion.

"If we want to discuss protecting rights for all Americans, it needs to pertain to everyone, including and especially newborns," Rep. Carol Miller said. The West Virginia Republican said the ERA would force government-funded health care providers to conduct abortions.

In the GOP-controlled Senate, Republicans Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska back a similar equal rights effort.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., was dismissive of the resolution when asked last week if he would allow it to come to the floor.

"I haven't thought about that," he said. "I am personally not a supporter, but I haven't thought about it."

If codified into the Constitution, the change would explicitly declare that women have equal rights under the law. Supporters say it's a long-needed protection for women who face discrimination in the workplace and struggle against domestic violence and sexual harassment.

Though many federal, state and local laws prohibit discrimination, those can be changed much more easily than a constitutional amendment. Courts treat sex discrimination cases inconsistently, advocates say.

"For too long, women have relied on the patchwork quilt of laws and precedents," Speier said. "We have been forced to take our cases all the way to the Supreme Court - and often there we lose."

Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., countered that the amendment would bring many consequences harmful to women. Girls would no longer pay less for car insurance for having fewer accidents than boys, he said. Women, who live longer than men, would have to pay higher life insurance rates.

"Look past what looks nice on a bumper sticker," he said.

Congress approved the ERA in 1972, including in it what the Congressional Research Service calls a "customary, but not constitutionally mandatory," seven-year deadline for ratification by three-fourths of the states. When the number of states fell three short of the required 38 by 1977, Congress extended the deadline to 1982. No additional states acted by the new deadline.

Speier said it's no coincidence that the ratification efforts began anew in 2017 when women took to the streets in protests, then marched to the polls in the subsequent elections, including last year's in Virginia that gave Democrats the votes to approve the ERA in the state Legislature.

In 2017, Nevada became the 36th state to ratify the amendment. Illinois followed in 2018. After coming within one vote of passage in the Virginia Legislature when it was under GOP control last year, the Democratic-controlled Legislature voted in January to approve it.

This is the first time that a proposed constitutional amendment was approved by the required number of states after a deadline under the premise that it could still be ratified.

The Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel said last month that the only way to ratify the amendment is to start the process over again.

"We conclude that Congress had the constitutional authority to impose a deadline on the ratification of the ERA and, because that deadline has expired, the ERA Resolution is no longer pending before the States," the opinion says.

The Justice Department weighed in because Alabama, South Dakota and Louisiana filed a federal lawsuit to block the archivist of the United States from certifying ratification.

Besides Alabama and Louisiana, other states that have not ratified the amendment are: Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Utah.

South Dakota, which is part of the legal challenge, ratified the amendment in 1973, then voted to withdraw in 1979. Four other states - Nebraska, Tennessee, Idaho and Kentucky - also voted to withdraw in the 1970s. Whether the Constitution allows states to do that is another potential issue for the courts.

On a separate track from the resolution voted on Thursday, House and Senate Democrats introduced legislation that would start the ratification process over.

If approved, the Constitution would state that "equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex."

"How," asked House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., "can you have a problem with that?"

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Equal Rights Amendment for women: House votes to remove deadline


More Related News

Coronavirus talks in Congress face timeline as Trump ponders his own action
Coronavirus talks in Congress face timeline as Trump ponders his own action
  • US
  • 2020-08-05 17:03:38Z

Congressional Democratic leaders and White House officials were set to resume negotiations on coronavirus relief legislation on Wednesday, with the administration officials aiming for an agreement by Friday. After more than a week of talks and few signs of progress, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer were said to be aiming for a deal that could be passed by Congress next week. Mnuchin said late on Tuesday that the two sides were trying to reach an overall agreement by the end of this week.

Progressive congresswoman Rashida Tlaib defeats primary challenger in
Progressive congresswoman Rashida Tlaib defeats primary challenger in 'Squad' win
  • US
  • 2020-08-05 14:17:30Z

U.S. Representative Rashida Tlaib, one of the most visible progressive Democrats in Congress, claimed victory Wednesday in the Democratic primary election against challenger Detroit City Council President Brenda Jones. County elections results showed Tlaib with 63,650 votes to Jones' 32,582 with 89.9% of precincts reporting in the nomination contest. Tlaib, a member of the "Squad" of four progressive congresswomen first elected in 2018, has so far declined to endorse the party's presumptive nominee, former Vice President Joe Biden, for his November face-off with Republican President Donald Trump.

Not in the room where it happens: U.S. Senate
Not in the room where it happens: U.S. Senate's McConnell opts out of coronavirus talks
  • US
  • 2020-08-05 10:02:49Z

McConnell, a Republican like President Donald Trump, said on Tuesday he is deliberately hanging back as Congress's top Democrats and White House negotiators work out a deal to help American families stay afloat during severe economic times caused by the coronavirus pandemic. If they reach a deal, he said, it would be "something I'm prepared to support even if I have some problems with certain parts of it."

Worries about 2020 census
Worries about 2020 census' accuracy grow with cut schedule
  • World
  • 2020-08-04 13:48:46Z

The U.S. Census Bureau is cutting its schedule for data collection for the 2020 census a month short as legislation that would have extended the national head count's deadlines stalls in the U.S. Senate. The move is worrying researchers, politicians and others who say the change will miss hard-to-count communities, including minorities and immigrants, and produce less trustworthy data. The Census Bureau said late Monday that the door-knocking and ability for households to respond either online, by phone or by mail to the questionnaire will stop at the end of September instead of the end of October so that it can meet an end-of-the-year deadline to turn in numbers used for redrawing...

U.S. congressional primaries in five states feature polar political opposites
U.S. congressional primaries in five states feature polar political opposites
  • US
  • 2020-08-04 10:30:10Z

Kansas arch-conservative Kris Kobach and prominent Michigan progressive Rashida Tlaib - candidates from the outer edges of the Republican and Democratic parties - are on the ballot Tuesday when five U.S. states hold primary elections for Congress. The outcomes in Kansas, Michigan, Arizona, Missouri and Washington state will set the stage for Nov. 3 elections to the House of Representatives and Senate that will determine the balance of power in Washington.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply


Top News: Business