New York D.A. won't appeal state ruling on jury trials for noncitizens




  • In US
  • 2018-12-04 21:44:03Z
  • By By Jonathan Stempel

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The district attorney in New York City's Bronx County decided not to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review a decision by the state's highest court guaranteeing noncitizens in the city charged with minor crimes the right to jury trials when convictions could lead to deportation.

Darcel Clark, the district attorney, on Tuesday instead urged state legislators to address issues raised in the Nov. 27 decision, and perhaps change state law to ensure jury trials for all residents charged with Class B misdemeanors.

The state Court of Appeals ruled 5-2 that the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution required jury trials for noncitizens charged with crimes carrying maximum prison terms of six months or less, even for minor offenses.

Its decision meant a new trial for Saylor Suazo, a Honduran citizen whose "visa overstay" status made him deportable, and who had been convicted in a bench trial on misdemeanor charges of striking and choking the mother of his children.

The decision coincided with moves by U.S. President Donald Trump, whose administration was not involved in the case, to speed up deportations and tighten U.S. borders.

Clark, in an emailed statement, said the ruling "creates a new burden for noncitizens to reveal their immigration status and establish the risk of deportation in order to take advantage of this newly-announced right to a jury trial," and requires judges to predict the outcomes of civil deportation proceedings for defendants who appear before them.

She said legislators should consider extending a state law that gives all New York residents, apart from those in New York City, a right to jury trials for Class B misdemeanors.

"This statute was enacted decades ago to promote judicial economy," Clark said. "As misdemeanor cases have decreased some 40 percent in the last five years, and deportation looms as a consequence for some defendants, I believe it is time for the legislature to provide jury trials for all New York City residents."


(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Leslie Adler)

COMMENTS

More Related News

War memorial or religious symbol? Cross fight reaches U.S. high court
War memorial or religious symbol? Cross fight reaches U.S. high court
  • US
  • 2019-02-22 12:42:06Z

There was nothing about it that made me think it was anything other than a Christian cross," Edwords, 70, said in an interview. Edwords and two other plaintiffs filed a 2014 lawsuit challenging the cross as a violation of the U.S. Constitution's Establishment Clause, which prohibits the government from establishing an official religion and bars governmental actions favoring one religion over another. While the Establishment Clause's scope is a matter of dispute, most Supreme Court experts predict the challenge to the Peace Cross will fail, with the justices potentially setting a new precedent allowing greater government involvement in religious expression.

Amazon deal fallout: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez making political enemies?
Amazon deal fallout: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez making political enemies?

Washington Examiner commentary writer Becket Adams on the political fallout from Amazon pulling out of its deal in New York City and the other cities trying to woo the ecommerce giant.

Does a 40-foot Latin cross honoring World War I veterans violate the Constitution? The Supreme Court will decide.
Does a 40-foot Latin cross honoring World War I veterans violate the Constitution? The Supreme Court will decide.

The Supreme Court considers whether a Latin cross to honor World War I dead violates the First Amendment.

New billboard blasts Ocasio-Cortez for driving Amazon out of NYC
New billboard blasts Ocasio-Cortez for driving Amazon out of NYC

Job Creators Network President Alfredo Ortiz discusses his company's new billboard, which slammed Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) for helping to push Amazon out of New York City.

Supreme Court Rules Unanimously to Limit Civil Forfeiture Laws
Supreme Court Rules Unanimously to Limit Civil Forfeiture Laws

Supreme Court Rules Unanimously to Limit Civil Forfeiture Laws

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: US

facebook
Hit "Like"
Don't miss any important news
Thanks, you don't need to show me this anymore.