New Jersey can enforce gun ammunition limit: U.S. appeals court




  • In US
  • 2018-12-05 21:34:47Z
  • By By Jonathan Stempel

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) - New Jersey may enforce a new law that lowered the number of bullets that guns can hold, a divided federal appeals court ruled on Wednesday.

The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia upheld a lower court's refusal to temporarily enjoin the law, which was passed in June and reduced maximum magazine capacity to 10 rounds from a 15-round limit adopted in 1990.

Gun rights advocates including the Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs argued that the law would make it harder for homeowners to defend themselves, and might do little for gun violence because criminals would ignore it.

But the court said the law did not violate gun owners' Second Amendment rights or amount to an unconstitutional taking.

It also said an exemption letting retired law enforcement officers carry larger magazines did not deprive ordinary gun owners of equal protection.

"New Jersey's law reasonably fits the state's interest in public safety and does not unconstitutionally burden the Second Amendment's right to self-defense in the home," Circuit Judge Patty Shwartz wrote for the majority.

Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas dissented, saying the majority was too deferential to New Jersey, which failed to offer "real evidence" that its law would reduce the risk of mass shootings and that similar magazine restrictions worked elsewhere.

Supporters of the law said magazine limits could reduce bloodshed by forcing shooters to reload more frequently.

Wednesday's decision upheld a Sept. 28 order by U.S. District Judge Peter Sheridan in Trenton, New Jersey.

Scott Bach, the New Jersey gun group's executive director, said the decision turns "one million honest citizens into felons for keeping property obtained legally that could be used for defending their lives," and would be appealed.

The office of New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal called the decision "a big win for public safety and the safety of our law enforcement officers."

According to Wednesday's opinions, nine states and Washington, D.C. have banned large capacity magazines, and several federal appeals courts have upheld such bans.

Wednesday's decision is "a real victory for public safety," said Hannah Shearer, a lawyer at the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, which supported New Jersey's law.

The center is named for former Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, who was shot in the head at a 2011 constituent meeting by the first bullet from a gunman's 33-round magazine, which was emptied. Six people died and 13 others were wounded.

The case is Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs Inc et al v Attorney General of New Jersey et al, 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 18-3170.


(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; editing by Marguerita Choy)

COMMENTS

More Related News

Does a 40-foot Latin cross honoring World War I veterans violate the Constitution? The Supreme Court will decide.
Does a 40-foot Latin cross honoring World War I veterans violate the Constitution? The Supreme Court will decide.

The Supreme Court considers whether a Latin cross to honor World War I dead violates the First Amendment.

Police officer leaves $100 tip, note 'from the heart' for pregnant waitress
Police officer leaves $100 tip, note 'from the heart' for pregnant waitress

The $100 tip on a bill for $8.75 included a note telling Courtney English to enjoy her first child and that she'll never forget it.

Supreme Court to rule on contaminated groundwater under Clean Water Act
Supreme Court to rule on contaminated groundwater under Clean Water Act

The Supreme Court agreed Tuesday to decide if contamination of groundwater that seeps into rivers, lakes and oceans violates the Clean Water Act.

U.S. top court rejects Maryland bid to revive drug price-gouging law
U.S. top court rejects Maryland bid to revive drug price-gouging law
  • US
  • 2019-02-19 15:27:13Z

The justices declined to take up Maryland's appeal of a 2018 federal appeals court ruling that struck down the state's law, That ruling held that Maryland had regulated wholesale pricing by the companies in violation of the U.S. Constitution's bar on state-level regulation of interstate commerce. The Association for Accessible Medicines, a trade group representing generic drug manufacturers such as Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd and Mylan NV, filed the legal challenge against the anti-price gouging law. Maryland enacted the measure in 2017 after a series of high-profile price hikes by drugmakers including a 2015 increase by Turing Pharmaceuticals of its anti-parasitic drug Daraprim...

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: US

facebook
Hit "Like"
Don't miss any important news
Thanks, you don't need to show me this anymore.