NCAA injury debate pits player privacy vs. gambling concerns

  • In Sports/Football
  • 2018-08-10 19:22:22Z
  • By TERRIN WAACK (AP Sports Writer)

NEW YORK (AP) -- Indiana safety Jonathan Crawford is very clear about what he thinks of colleges releasing information on player injuries.

''No,'' he said. ''Especially if I have no say in it, I wouldn't want my personal business out there.''

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision that allows states to legalize sports gambling has sparked a debate about requiring injury reports in college football, a sport that hasn't had unified rules. NCAA leaders are analyzing whether it's possible to have more medical transparency to prevent collusion and be more consistent among hundreds of teams balancing the rules of various universities, conferences and state and federal laws.

No formal plans have been proposed as legal experts and compliance officers analyze an issue that's more complicated for college football than the NFL, which has a mandated reporting system. A similar system of regular in-depth reports in the NCAA would have the hurdle of privacy for younger athletes. New rules likely won't come soon - the new season starts in three weeks and just four states have officially legalized sports gambling.

Privacy laws such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) protect players against the release of personal information without the consent of players or their parents if the player is under 18. HIPAA protects medical records. FERPA protects educational records, along with medical records if treatment is given on behalf of a university.

At least some players and coaches want that privacy to stay in place.

''I coached in the NFL for nine years and there is a stark difference between working with professionals and working with college kids,'' Stanford coach David Shaw said. ''I do not feel right giving out medical information of a 19-year-old. I think it's wrong in any way, shape or form.''

Still, commissioners from the Power Five conferences generally believe some kind of uniform injury reporting is inevitable, even if the details still need to be worked out.

Players consent to NFL injury reports as a condition of employment. Three practice participation reports are required every game week, along with game status reports and in-game updates.

Right now, there is no standard in the NCAA for discussing player injuries.

''My university's attorney told me, 'You cannot be specific with any injuries. You can say upper body. You can say lower body,''' said Todd Berry, who coached college football for 34 years and is now executive director of the American Football Coaches Association. ''Many times the media would already know what it was, but that's all I could reference.''

Some coaches are more specific. Others are reluctant to share anything at all.

Washington State's Mike Leach has a history of not even answering questions after a game about a player who was injured on the field. Chip Kelly also never talked about injuries while at Oregon - he's now at UCLA - and eventually neither did his successor, Mark Helfrich, who's now in the NFL. Miami's Mark Richt used to be pretty open about injury updates but started to cut back because other coaches were withholding information.

Others are more forthcoming, like Joe Moorhead at Mississippi State and Duke's David Cutcliffe.

That inconsistency could potentially raise red flags as legal gambling grows throughout the United States. If one coach reveals more than another, it opens up questions of whether it creates a chance for some gamblers to gain an unfair edge.

''When there's less info out there, you have a greater chance of having inside information,'' said Brad Powers, senior college football analyst for ''When there's more information, when everyone knows everything - like the NFL, you know exactly if a guy is probable, doubtful or questionable - then nobody really has any inside information.''

Powers said bettors want a common language across the conferences. Coaches also want consistency, Berry said.

That could mean only releasing a player's status for the game - an availability report, which may be the safest option. Or injuries could be defined as lower or upper body only.

''The more specific you get, the greater the chance is that you will wander into an area that is protected by one or both of those statutes (HIPAA and FERPA),'' said attorney William H. Brooks, who works in the NCAA compliance and investigations group for his firm, Lightfoot, Franklin & White LLC.

''Now,'' he added, ''if someone gets hurt on the field in front of 90,000 people and you see what happened, then obviously everybody knows what the injury is. But coaches don't elaborate on the treatment, how the player is doing other than he or she is progressing.''

Berry said an argument can be made that no injury information should be released if institutions really want to protect the privacy of student athletes.

''We're going to show up and play Saturday - or whatever day it is - and who I put out there is who were playing,'' he said. ''Although, that wouldn't make it much fun for the gamblers or for the media.''


AP Sports Writer Aaron Beard and AP freelancer Scott Held contributed to this report.


More AP college football: and


More Related News

AP sources: NFL to consider expanding replay reviews
AP sources: NFL to consider expanding replay reviews

The NFL will consider expanding replay reviews to include certain penalties, including pass interference. Two people with direct knowledge of the NFL's plans tell The Associated Press that the league's competition committee once again will look into including more plays for video review. The

Since NFL tweaked rule, most playoff overtimes ended on first-drive TDs
Since NFL tweaked rule, most playoff overtimes ended on first-drive TDs

In 2011, the NFL decided it was time to change overtime in the postseason. Overtime in the NFL playoffs had been sudden-death since the very first overtime game in 1958, when the Colts beat the Giants in what some call the Greatest Game Ever Played. But starting in 2011, the league decided that a field

Gayle Benson essentially dares NFL to fine her
Gayle Benson essentially dares NFL to fine her

On Monday, Saints owner Gayle Benson essentially dared the league office to impose a fine on her via a statement that, while not blistering on the surface, was the equivalent of a knife in the gut administered with a smile on the face. I am thoroughly disappointed by the events that led to the outcome of yesterday's game," Gayle Benson said in the Monday statement. No team should ever be denied the opportunity to reach the title game (or simply win a game) based on the actions, or inactions, of those charged with creating a fair and equitable playing field.

Gayle Benson: NFL must commit to providing fairness and integrity
Gayle Benson: NFL must commit to providing fairness and integrity

Saints owner Gayle Benson has weighed in for the first time since Sunday's overtime loss to the Rams ended her team's season short of the Super Bowl. Much of the statement released through the team is focused on thanking the fans for their support in a season that was "especially meaningful" because

NFL still silent on fateful non-call in Rams-Saints
NFL still silent on fateful non-call in Rams-Saints

Early Sunday night, the NFL intended to publicly admit error in the failure to call pass interference at a key moment late in the NFC Championship between the Rams and Saints. Late Sunday night, the NFL had decided to wait. On Monday, the NFL is still waiting. It's a delicate balance for the league,

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply


Top News: Football

Hit "Like"
Don't miss any important news
Thanks, you don't need to show me this anymore.