Missouri Senate passes bill to ban abortions after eight weeks

  • In US
  • 2019-05-16 15:03:37Z
  • By Reuters

(Reuters) - Missouri's Republican-controlled Senate passed a bill early on Thursday that would ban abortions after the eighth week of pregnancy except in medical emergencies.

The vote came a day after Alabama's governor signed into law a ban on abortions at any time absent a medical emergency.

The bills, along with similar measures proposed in more than a dozen other states, are the latest effort by conservatives to challenge Roe v. Wade, the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision from 1973 establishing a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy.

"This comprehensive, life-affirming legislation prohibits abortions once a heartbeat has been detected, prohibits abortions when a baby is capable of feeling pain, and would outlaw abortion in Missouri upon the reversal of Roe v. Wade," the Missouri Senate Republicans said in a statement.

Senate Democrats opposed the bill.

The Missouri Stands for the Unborn bill will go back to the Republican-controlled House of Representatives for a final approval vote before it can head to Missouri Governor Mike Parson, a Republican, to be signed into law. The bill passed the Senate in a 24-10 vote, NBC News reported.

Parson has planned a news conference on Thursday afternoon in support of what he called "one of the strongest pro-life bills in the country."

The bill would not allow an abortion even in the case of rape or incest. It would punish doctors with a prison sentence for carrying out a banned abortion but would not punish women who seek the procedure.

Supporters of such restrictions say fetuses should be afforded rights similar to those of babies. Many supporters are Christians and say they believe God forbids most abortions. The House version of the Missouri bill says that "God is the author of life."

Opponents of the legislation, including the American Civil Liberties Union and many Democratic lawmakers, say women should not be deprived of bodily autonomy and that bans lead to an increase in women seeking riskier illegal abortions.

The U.S. Supreme Court, now with a majority of conservative justices after U.S. President Donald Trump appointed two, could possibly overturn Roe v. Wade. That decision held that the due process clause of the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment provides a fundamental right to privacy that protects a woman's right to abortion.

(This story has been refiled to refiled to fix typo in "feeling" in paragraph 4).

(Reporting by Jonathan Allen; Editing by Daniel Wallis and Bill Trott)


More Related News

Polls open in corruption-tainted Guatemala to elect new president
Polls open in corruption-tainted Guatemala to elect new president

Corruption-weary Guatemalans went to the polls on Sunday to elect a new president after a tumultuous campaign that saw two leading candidates barred from taking part and the top electoral crimes prosecutor forced to flee the country, fearing for his life. The Supreme Court opened voting at 7:00 am (1300 GMT) where a crowded field of 19 candidates is vying to succeed unpopular outgoing president Jimmy Morales. "We hope the start of voting will attract the biggest turnout," said Supreme Court president Julio Solorzano.

Brazil's president says criminalizing homophobia could 'hurt' gays

Brasília (AFP) - Brazil's far-right President Jair Bolsonaro on Friday criticized the Supreme Court's decision to criminalize homophobia, saying it could "hurt" gays by deterring companies from hiring them. Bolsonaro, who has a history of homophobic remarks -- he once declared he would rather his son die than be gay -- also said the court was "completely wrong" because it had stepped into legislative territory. The Supreme Court on Thursday voted eight to three in favor of classifying crimes against gay and transgender people as similar to racism, until Congress passes a law specifically addressing such discrimination.

Kansas high court says education funding is adequate
Kansas high court says education funding is adequate

Kansas' highest court declared Friday that the state finally is spending enough money on its public schools under a new education funding law but refused to end a lawsuit filed nearly a decade ago because it wants to monitor future funding by the Legislature. The state Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision signing off on a law enacted in April that will boost the state's education funding by roughly $90 million a year. It was the high court's seventh ruling in less than six years in a lawsuit filed by four local school districts in 2010.

U.S. court rules against Trump administration in immigrant teen abortion case
U.S. court rules against Trump administration in immigrant teen abortion case
  • US
  • 2019-06-14 17:06:57Z

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld a lower court decision that found the government cannot unduly burden the ability of a woman to obtain an abortion under established Supreme Court precedent. The case involves the intersection of two divisive social issues on which Republican President Donald Trump has taken a hard line: abortion and immigration.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply


Top News: US

Hit "Like"
Don't miss any important news
Thanks, you don't need to show me this anymore.