Meanwhile, on the cold, cold Hot Stove . . .




 

It's Hot Stove Season baby! You know what that means! Yep: time to watch some teams sign a few relievers to minor league deals and then wait everyone out until February while talking about the need to maintain financial flexibility! FEEL THE BURN.

In more specific news:

We've talked a lot about Betts this winter already, and that seems like madness. Bryant's career with the Cubs began with business-side acrimony, it's still simmering, and there is no sense that either side is amenable to a long-term deal before he hits free agency. The Indians have been signaling for some time that they have no interest in keeping Lindor long term.

It's quite the thing when three teams who are supposed to be contending are, instead, looking to deal recent MVP award winners and candidates who are 27 and 26 years old, but these are the times in which we are living.

As I wrote last offseason, there is an increasing disconnect between attendance and other proxies of broad fan interest and revenue. Which is to say that, as long as teams continue to get fat on long-term TV deals, side businesses like real estate development, and soaking a smaller and wealthier segment of the fan base with higher and higher prices, they really have no reason to care if several thousand common or casual fans become alienated by their teams' lack of desire to compete.

Sullivan doesn't offer ideas about how that can happen, but over the past couple of seasons we've seen a number of proposals, some broad, some specific, about how MLB can turn its free agency/trading period into frantic, 1-3 day scrambles-to-sign like we see in both the NBA and NFL. I'm sympathetic to that desire - it's exciting! - but any attempt to do that in Major League Baseball, at least as things are currently set up, would be a disaster for the players.

In the NBA and NFL you have salary caps and floors and, in the NBA, you have max contracts. As a result, teams both have a set amount of money to spend and an incentive to spend that money. We can quibble with whether those incentives are the best ones or if they benefit the players as much as other systems might, but there's at least something inherent in their systems which inspires teams to sign free agents.

In Major League Baseball, there is no such incentive. May teams want to keep payrolls as low as possible under the guise of rebuilding or tanking and there is no effective mechanism to keep them from doing so. Even nominal contenders - see the Cubs, Indians and Red sox in item 1 above - spend more time thinking about how to cut payroll rather than add talent. This is bolstered by the stuff in item 2 above in which attendance and even winning has less of an impact on the bottom line than it ever has.

So, why scramble to sign players by a set deadline? Under most of the scenarios I see floated - like the laughably horrible one MLB reportedly suggested to the MLBPA - teams would just wait out free agents until deadline day, give them crappy take-it-or-leave-it offers and then leave them all scrambling to sign one-year deals or to sit the season out.

For such a thing to happen - or for teams to want to keep their bright young stars or for the league to want to maintain fan interest and keep attendance from continuing to slide - there must be incentives put in place to make them want to sign and retain players. To make them want to win. To make them want to excite the fan base.

At present, such incentives are not there. And, as such, we are faced with yet another winter with a cold, cold stove.

COMMENTS

More Related News

MLB rumors: Red Sox, free agent Jose Peraza agree to one-year contract
MLB rumors: Red Sox, free agent Jose Peraza agree to one-year contract

The Boston Red Sox bolstered their infield depth Thursday by agreeing to sign Jose Peraza to a one-year contract worth about $3 million plus incentives, per MLB Network's Jon Heyman.

MLB rumors: This NL West team has discussed David Price trade with Red Sox
MLB rumors: This NL West team has discussed David Price trade with Red Sox

The Boston Red Sox need to clear salary, and trading starting pitcher David Price is one of the best ways to accomplish that goal.

MLB rumors: Yankees reportedly land Gerrit Cole with 9-year, $324 miillon deal
MLB rumors: Yankees reportedly land Gerrit Cole with 9-year, $324 miillon deal

The Red Sox' rival fortifies their rotation by landing the free-agent pitching price of the offseason - right-hander Gerrit Cole agrees to a nine-year, $324 million deal, according to Jon Heyman of the MLB Network.

Could Mookie Betts be part of a David Price trade from Red Sox?
Could Mookie Betts be part of a David Price trade from Red Sox?

Multiple teams have made Red Sox left-hander David Price a trade target, according to an ESPN report from the winter meetings in San Diego. That Jeff Passan report echoes what our own John Tomase reported last week - that while Price's $32 million salary for 2020 had him viewed by many as untradeable, he could be on the move out of Boston. MORE TOMASE: No defense for Red Sox fielding last season and Alex Cora knows it And Tomase reports Tuesday from the winter meetings that the player the Red Sox could "attach" to Price in a trade might be Mookie Betts as Boston looks to get its payroll down to its stated goal of being below the $208-million luxury-tax threshold.

MLB rumors: Free agent Madison Bumgarner has interest from seven teams
MLB rumors: Free agent Madison Bumgarner has interest from seven teams

President of baseball operations Farhan Zaidi made it clear on Monday during Winter Meetings Live that the Giants still are in the Bumgarner market. "We're involved in those discussions," Zaidi said while appearing on Winter Meetings Live. "We're planning to meet with his representatives this week and they have other meetings scheduled, too.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Baseball