Lone Wisconsin Republican Who Opposed Stealing Democrats' Power Explains Why




 

The vote by the Republican-controlled Wisconsin Legislature to strip power away from the incoming governor and attorney general split for the most part along predictable partisan lines. Not surprisingly, Democrats didn't go along with weakening those positions just as members of their own party are set to take the offices.

In the state Assembly, the measure passed on a party-line vote, 56-27. In the Senate, it passed 17-16, with every Democrat opposed. One Republican notably broke ranks and also voted against it.

State Sen. Robert Cowles (R), who represents Green Bay, released a statement Thursday explaining why he sided with Democrats on SB 884:

Although Cowles occasionally breaks with his party, he's certainly not viewed as liberal by Democrats in the state.

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) has steadily amassed power during his eight-year tenure. But since he lost his re-election bid to Democrat Tony Evers, Republicans have pushed the last-minute effort to shift some of that executive branch power to the Legislature.

SB 884 would limit the duties of the attorney general by taking away his power to name a solicitor general to represent the state in major lawsuits. Legislators would instead get to hire their own outside lawyers to represent the state. The bill would also give lawmakers, rather than the attorney general, the power to decide how to spend settlement money.

The bill would restrict early voting ― which is generally known to increase voter turnout and thus help Democrats ― prevent Evers from banning guns in the state capitol without the Legislature's approval and give lawmakers increased control over a beleaguered state economic development agency.

The legislation now heads to Walker's desk for his signature.

COMMENTS

More Related News

Trump vows veto as Democrats try to block emergency order
Trump vows veto as Democrats try to block emergency order

Democrats controlling the House have teed up a vote next week to block President Donald Trump from using a national emergency declaration to fund a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, accelerating a showdown in Congress that could divide Republicans and lead to Trump's first veto. The Democrats introduced

Reparations for Slavery: Just More Symbolism over Substance
Reparations for Slavery: Just More Symbolism over Substance

The French people recently completed paying out about $60 million to non-French victims of the Holocaust and their survivors in a program administered by the United States, a reminder that the United States' central role in the rehabilitation and rebuilding of postwar Europe never quite came to a conclusion.This settlement, which is separate from the reparations paid to French victims of the Holocaust, recognizes the French collaboration in transporting non-citizens to Nazi death camps on French trains. Most of those receiving the reparations are now Americans or Israelis.The terms of the payments are specific, limiting the reparations to the survivors themselves, their spouses, their...

U.S. Coast Guard officer accused of terror plot could face more charges
U.S. Coast Guard officer accused of terror plot could face more charges
  • US
  • 2019-02-21 20:40:57Z

A U.S. Coast Guard lieutenant accused of amassing a cache of weapons and plotting to attack Democratic politicians and journalists was ordered held for two weeks on Thursday while federal prosecutors consider charging him with more crimes. Chris Hasson, 49, appeared in a burgundy jumpsuit but did not speak during a brief hearing in federal court in Greenbelt, Maryland. "There is an intent to murder innocent civilians," U.S. Attorney Jennifer Sykes told Judge Charles Day.

Oregon set to become 1st state with mandatory rent controls
Oregon set to become 1st state with mandatory rent controls

SALEM, Ore. (AP) - Faced with a housing shortage and skyrocketing rents, Oregon is poised to become the first state to impose mandatory rent controls, with a measure establishing tenant protections moving swiftly through the Legislature.

Why vote for Sanders when you can have Elizabeth Warren instead?
Why vote for Sanders when you can have Elizabeth Warren instead?

Senator Bernie Sanders announced his 2020 presidential run on Tuesday, reigniting old divisions within the Democratic party. In the 2016 primary, Democratic voters were presented with a choice: Sanders, who represented the potential of redistributive policy, and Clinton, who represented the possibility of shattering, as she put it, the last, highest glass ceiling. For leftist women, to express enthusiasm for Sanders' policy proposals was seen as condoning the sexist attacks on Clinton.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Latin America

facebook
Hit "Like"
Don't miss any important news
Thanks, you don't need to show me this anymore.