Lindsey Graham Suggests GOP Should Confirm Kavanaugh Quickly Before Midterm Elections




Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Wednesday argued that the Senate Judiciary
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Wednesday argued that the Senate Judiciary  

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Wednesday argued that the Senate Judiciary Committee should proceed "as soon as possible" with Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation, saying that a longer process would be "not about finding the truth, but delaying the process till after the midterm elections."

His comments hint at a concern of many Republicans: that they need to confirm Kavanaugh quickly in case the GOP loses its chance if Democrats take back control of the Senate in November's election.

Graham tweeted that the committee should not honor the request of Christine Blasey Ford, who goes by Christine Blasey professionally, that the FBI investigate her sexual assault allegation against Kavanaugh before she testifies.

Of course, delaying a Supreme Court nomination until after an election isn't anything new. Just ask Republicans, who in 2016 tabled the confirmation process of Merrick Garland, President Barack Obama's Supreme Court pick, arguing that the American people needed to have a say via their presidential vote.

Garland never even had a chance. Republicans held the seat open for almost a year - until President Donald Trump took office, after which they quickly confirmed Justice Neil Gorsuch.

With Kavanaugh's confirmation, Republicans seem poised to proceed as planned, having scheduled a hearing for next Monday.

Attorneys for Blasey have said she is willing to testify before the Senate about the incident, in which she alleges Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her at a party when they were in high school. But on Tuesday night, they said she wants the FBI to conduct an investigation before her testimony.

Several Republican committee members, all of whom are male, have suggested the investigation is unnecessary. Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is among them.

"The invitation for Monday still stands," Grassley said in a statement Tuesday night. "Dr. Ford's testimony would reflect her personal knowledge and memory of events. Nothing the FBI or any other investigator does would have any bearing on what Dr. Ford tells the committee, so there is no reason for any further delay."

COMMENTS

More Related News

As 2020 candidates turn left, some Democrats worry about the center
As 2020 candidates turn left, some Democrats worry about the center
  • US
  • 2019-02-23 11:06:47Z

Party activists have been energized as Cory Booker, Kirsten Gillibrand, Kamala Harris and other candidates endorsed plans to provide Medicare coverage to every American, some form of tuition-free college, a national $15 minimum wage and the so-called "Green New Deal" advocated by U.S. Representative

House Democrats Take First Step to Thwart Trump Emergency Decree
House Democrats Take First Step to Thwart Trump Emergency Decree

The resolution is assured of passing the Democratic-controlled House, and it could get enough GOP votes to pass the Senate with a simple majority. Trump on Friday repeated a threat to veto the resolution. It would be difficult to muster the two-thirds vote in both chambers for an override given the reluctance of most congressional Republicans to defy Trump, who maintains solid support among GOP voters.

Joe Scarborough Goes After Donald Trump, GOP For
Joe Scarborough Goes After Donald Trump, GOP For 'Pathetic' Silence On Alleged Terror Plot

Scarborough, the co-host of MSNBC's "Morning Joe," was reportedly one of thepublic figures white nationalist Christopher Paul Hasson researched whileplanning an attack

War memorial or religious symbol? Cross fight reaches U.S. high court
War memorial or religious symbol? Cross fight reaches U.S. high court
  • US
  • 2019-02-22 12:42:06Z

There was nothing about it that made me think it was anything other than a Christian cross," Edwords, 70, said in an interview. Edwords and two other plaintiffs filed a 2014 lawsuit challenging the cross as a violation of the U.S. Constitution's Establishment Clause, which prohibits the government from establishing an official religion and bars governmental actions favoring one religion over another. While the Establishment Clause's scope is a matter of dispute, most Supreme Court experts predict the challenge to the Peace Cross will fail, with the justices potentially setting a new precedent allowing greater government involvement in religious expression.

Rep. Jim Jordan takes aim at Democratic lawmaker Adam Schiff
Rep. Jim Jordan takes aim at Democratic lawmaker Adam Schiff

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) discusses how former FBI Director Andrew McCabe said that the DOJ discussed using the 25th Amendment to remove President Trump from office, the upcoming release of special counsel Robert Mueller's final report and whether Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) should recuse himself from the Russia probe.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Latin America

facebook
Hit "Like"
Don't miss any important news
Thanks, you don't need to show me this anymore.