Lindsey Graham: Blasey's Testimony Won't Sway My Vote 'Unless There's Something More'




 

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Sunday continued to voice skepticism about Christine Blasey Ford, the woman who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault.

During an interview on "Fox News Sunday," the Senate Judiciary Committee member said he needed more evidence to believe Blasey's allegation that Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed and groped her during a high school party in the 1980s.

"What do you expect me to do? What am I supposed to do? Go ahead and ruin this guy's life? I don't know when it happened, I don't where it happened, and everybody being named in regard to being there said it didn't happen," Graham said when asked if he's keeping an open mind about Kavanaugh's nomination.

"Unless there's something more, no, I'm not going to ruin Judge Kavanaugh's life over this," the South Carolina Republican added. "But she should come forward, she should have her say, she will be respectfully treated."

After days of negotiations and uncertainty, the Senate Judiciary Committee and Blasey's attorneys on Saturday reached a tentative agreement for the California psychology professor to publicly testify at a hearing on Thursday. The committee's staff is expected to continue negotiating details of the hearing with Blasey's legal team on Sunday. Republicans, however, have so far resisted her demands to allow the questioning of additional alleged witnesses at the hearing.

Four people Blasey initially cited to have attended the party in question have issued statements saying they don't have any recollection of the alleged incident. On Saturday, a lawyer for a longtime friend of Blasey's named Leland Keyser said she "does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present."

Before she went public with her allegation, however, Blasey told The Washington Post she did not think Keyser would remember the party because nothing remarkable had happened there, as far as Keyser was aware.

"It's no surprise, if another person was … in the house that night and had no occurrence like the one that was stated by Dr. Ford, there's no reason why they wouldn't even remember that party scene 36 years ago," Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said Sunday on ABC's "This Week."

Mark Judge, a friend of Kavanaugh's who Blasey said was also in the room when the alleged incident took place, also said he had "no memory" of it.

Democrats said that dismissive statements like the one from Graham on Sunday illustrated the need for an FBI investigation into the alleged incident.

"That's the way the Senate Republicans have set this up: Do you believe her or do you believe him? That is exactly why we've been pressing for an FBI investigation," Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) said Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press."

The Washington senator noted that the Senate Judiciary Committee allowed additional witnesses and an FBI investigation during the 1991 hearing focusing on Anita Hill's accusations of sexual harassment by then-nominee Clarence Thomas, who now sits on the Supreme Court.

"The Senate Republicans have predetermined the outcome ... that this will be a he said, she says, by taking that away," Murray added.

Last week, Graham suggested proceeding to a vote on Kavanaugh's nomination "as soon as possible" because a longer process would be "not about finding the truth, but delaying the process till after the midterm elections."

As of now, Republicans are still planning on holding a committee vote to send the nomination to the full Senate later this month.

This story has been updated with comments from Sen. Dick Durbin.

COMMENTS

More Related News

Judge
Judge's ruling on 'Obamacare' poses new problems for GOP

WASHINGTON (AP) - A federal judge's ruling that the Obama health law is unconstitutional has landed like a stink bomb among Republicans, who've seen the politics of health care flip as Americans increasingly value the overhaul's core parts, including protections for pre-existing medical conditions and Medicaid for more low-income people.

Trump hails judge
Trump hails judge's ruling against Obamacare as 'great'

President Donald Trump on Saturday hailed a court decision against Obamacare as "a great ruling for our country," while a U.S. government official said the decision by a Texas judge would have no immediate impact on health coverage. U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor in Fort Worth, Texas, on Friday said that Obamacare, known formally as the 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA), was unconstitutional based on its mandate requiring that people buy health insurance. In a decision that could reach the U.S. Supreme Court, O'Connor sided with a coalition of 20 states that argued requiring people to pay for insurance coverage is illegal because a change in tax law last year eliminated a penalty for...

Federal judge rules Obamacare unconstitutional
Federal judge rules Obamacare unconstitutional
  • US
  • 2018-12-15 03:53:50Z

A U.S. federal judge in Texas ruled on Friday that the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare, is unconstitutional, a decision that was likely to be appealed to the Supreme Court. U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor in Fort Worth agreed with a coalition of 20 states that a change in tax law last year eliminating a penalty for not having health insurance invalidated the entire Obamacare law. O'Connor's decision was issued the day before the end of a 45-day sign-up period for 2019 health coverage under the law.

Obamacare Thrown Out by Judge, Raising Insurance Uncertainty
Obamacare Thrown Out by Judge, Raising Insurance Uncertainty

The decision Friday finding the Affordable Care Act unconstitutional comes at the tail end of a six-week open enrollment period for the program in 2019 and underscores a divide between Republicans who have long sought to invalidate the law and Democrats who fought to keep it in place. The White House

Federal Judge In Texas Rules Against Obamacare
Federal Judge In Texas Rules Against Obamacare

The Affordable Care Act could be headed back to the Supreme Court for the

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Latin America

facebook
Hit "Like"
Don't miss any important news
Thanks, you don't need to show me this anymore.