Kavanaugh does not belong on Supreme Court, retired Justice Stevens says




  • In US
  • 2018-10-05 02:43:49Z
  • By Reuters
Retired U.
Retired U.  

(Reuters) - Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens said on Thursday that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh does not belong on the high court because of "potential bias" he showed in his recent Senate confirmation hearing.

Speaking to an audience of retirees in Boca Raton, Florida, Stevens, 98, said he started out believing that Kavanaugh deserved to be confirmed, "but his performance during the hearings caused me to change my mind."

Stevens cited commentary by Harvard University law professor Laurence Tribe and others suggesting Kavanaugh had raised doubts about his political impartiality when he asserted that sexual misconduct accusations he faced stemmed from an "orchestrated political hit" funded by left-wing groups seeking "revenge on behalf of the Clintons."

Kavanaugh had spent more than three years working for Ken Starr, the independent counsel who investigated Democratic President Bill Clinton in the 1990s.

Kavanaugh also testified last week that allegations against him were being fueled by "pent-up anger" over the 2016 election of President Donald Trump, who nominated Kavanaugh to fill the Supreme Court vacancy created by the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy.

In a Wall Street Journal op-ed on Thursday, Kavanaugh said he "might have been too emotional at times" in his testimony. Kavanaugh wrote that his testimony "reflected my overwhelming frustration at being wrongly accused."

Some critics have argued that Kavanaugh's highly partisan remarks so compromised his ability to appear politically fair-minded that he would be forced to recuse himself on many cases to preserve the court's integrity.

Stevens said he, too, has come to believe that Kavanaugh, a U.S. appellate judge, "demonstrated a potential bias involving enough potential litigants before the (high) court that he would not be able to perform his full responsibilities."

"I think there's merit in that criticism, and that the senators should really pay attention to it for the good of the court. It's not healthy to get a new justice who can only do a part-time job," Stevens said.

Stevens, a lifelong Republican and appointee of President Gerald Ford who ended up as a generally liberal voice on the court by the time he retired in 2010, spoke at an event hosted by a Palm Beach Post reporter. Video of his remarks was shown by the C-SPAN television network.

Stevens acknowledged praising Kavanaugh and one of his rulings on foreign campaign contributions in his 2014 book "Six Amendments: How and Why We Should Change the Constitution."

Stevens went on to say that his change of heart on Kavanaugh's fitness for the high court was "for reasons that have really no relationship to his intellectual ability or his record as a federal judge. He's a fine federal judge."

Asked whether questions raised about Kavanaugh's credibility during the hearings should be disqualifying, Stevens said, "Not necessarily."

Stevens also said political leaders and the court have failed to repair the nation's confidence in the judicial branch's separation from the president and the legislature.

"I think it's worse, I regret to say it," he said.

The U.S. Senate is scheduled to vote on Kavanaugh's confirmation on Friday.

An FBI report to the Senate Judiciary Committee concluded an investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct against Kavanaugh by California psychology professor Christine Blasey Ford and former Yale classmate Deborah Ramirez.

(The story was refiled to remove extra words in paragraph 7)

(Reporting by Bill Tarrant and Steve Gorman in Los Angeles; Editing by Bill Berkrot and Leslie Adler)

COMMENTS

More Related News

Divided US Supreme Court hears politically charged census case
Divided US Supreme Court hears politically charged census case

A sharply divided US Supreme Court heard arguments on Tuesday in a case about the 2020 census that could have high-stakes implications for the future balance of political power in the United States. At the heart of the case is a bid by the administration of Republican President Donald Trump to ask respondents of the 2020 census whether they are US citizens.

Supreme Court hears dispute over Trump census citizenship question
Supreme Court hears dispute over Trump census citizenship question
  • US
  • 2019-04-23 10:26:13Z

Lower courts have blocked the question, ruling that the administration violated federal law and the U.S. Constitution in seeking to include it on the census form. The nine Supreme Court justices will hold an extended 80-minute argument session in the administration's appeal, with a ruling due by the end of June. The case comes in a pair of lawsuits by a group of states and localities led by New York state, and a coalition of immigrant rights groups challenging the legality of the question.

Supreme Court Will Decide Whether Employment Discrimination Laws Apply to LGBT Community
Supreme Court Will Decide Whether Employment Discrimination Laws Apply to LGBT Community

The Supreme Court will decide whether the main federal civil rights law that prohibits employment discrimination applies to LGBT people.

Supreme Court agrees to decide if sexual orientation, gender identity should get federal job protection
Supreme Court agrees to decide if sexual orientation, gender identity should get federal job protection

The Supreme Court agreed Monday to decide whether federal job discrimination laws apply to sexual orientation and gender identity.

Supreme Court takes up major gay, transgender job discrimination cases
Supreme Court takes up major gay, transgender job discrimination cases
  • US
  • 2019-04-22 14:26:40Z

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to decide whether U.S. law banning workplace discrimination on the basis of sex protects gay and transgender workers, as the conservative-majority court waded into a fierce dispute involving a divisive social issue. At issue in the high-profile legal fight is whether gay and transgender people are covered by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of sex as well as race, color, national origin and religion. The court will take up two cases concerning gay people who have said they were fired due to their sexual orientation, one involving a New York skydiving instructor named...

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: US

facebook
Hit "Like"
Don't miss any important news
Thanks, you don't need to show me this anymore.