Justices to take up dispute over subpoenas for Trump records




  • In Politics
  • 2019-12-13 21:34:13Z
  • By Associated Press
Justices to take up dispute over subpoenas for Trump records
Justices to take up dispute over subpoenas for Trump records  

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court said Friday it will hear President Donald Trump's pleas to keep his tax, bank and financial records private, a major confrontation between the president and Congress that also could affect the 2020 presidential campaign.

Arguments will take place in late March, and the justices are poised to issue decisions in June as Trump is campaigning for a second term. Rulings against the president could result in the quick release of personal financial information that Trump has sought strenuously to keep private. The court also will decide whether the Manhattan district attorney can obtain eight years of Trump's tax returns as part of an ongoing criminal investigation.

The subpoenas are separate from the ongoing impeachment proceedings against Trump, headed for a vote in the full House next week. Indeed, it's almost certain the court won't hear the cases until after a Senate trial over whether to remove Trump has ended.

Trump sued to prevent banks and accounting firms from complying with subpoenas for his records from three committees of the House of Representatives and Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.

In three separate cases, he has so far lost at every step, but the records have not been turned over pending a final court ruling. Now it will be up to a court that includes two Trump appointees, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, to decide in a case with significant implications reagrding a president's power to refuse a formal request from Congress.

In two earlier cases over presidential power, the justices acted unanimously in requiring President Richard Nixon to turn over White House tapes to the Watergate special prosecutor and in allowing a sexual harassment lawsuit against President Bill Clinton to go forward. In those cases, three Nixon appointees and two Clinton appointees, respectively, voted against the president who chose them for the high court. A fourth Nixon appointee, William Rehnquist, sat out the tapes case because he had worked closely as a Justice Department official with some of the Watergate conspirators whose upcoming trial spurred the subpoena for the Oval Office recordings.

In none of the cases are the subpoenas directed at Trump himself. Instead, House committees want records from Deutsche Bank and Capital One, as well as the Mazars USA accounting firm. Mazars also is the recipient of Vance's subpoena.

In each case, Vance and House Democrats have argued there is no compelling legal issue at stake, since they are seeking records from third parties, not Trump himself.

But Trump said in his appeals that the cases are the first time congressional and local criminal investigators have tried to pry free a president's records to investigate wrongdoing. "This is a case of firsts," Trump's lawyers told the justices about congressional demands for Trump's financial records from Mazars.

The Vance case represents the first time in American history that a "state or local prosecutor has launched a criminal investigation of the President," the lawyers wrote.

Appellate courts in Washington, D.C., and New York brushed aside the Trump arguments in decisions that focused on the subpoenas being addressed to third parties and asking for records of Trump's business and financial dealings as a private citizen, not as president.

Two congressional committees subpoenaed the bank documents as part their investigations into Trump and his businesses. Deutsche Bank has been one for the few banks willing to lend to Trump after a series of corporate bankruptcies and defaults starting in the early 1990s.

Vance and the House Oversight and Reform Committee sought records from Mazars concerning Trump and his businesses based on payments that Trump's former personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, arranged to keep two women from airing their claims of affairs with Trump during the presidential race.

COMMENTS

More Related News

Trump
Trump's TikTok and WeChat Ban Could Backfire Inside China
  • World
  • 2020-08-12 08:42:33Z

HONG KONG-As Donald Trump moves to ban transactions with WeChat and ByteDance, the parent company of TikTok, people in China are wondering if they'll need to ditch their iPhones to keep their favorite app, and noting that the White House's splinternet rhetoric is straight out of Beijing's own playbook. Trump's moves against ByteDance and Tencent's WeChat strike at two tech companies deeply entrenched in China's social life-and, in WeChat's case, critical to the consumer reach of American companies inside China. ByteDance's TikTok, the popular short video platform that in the past weeks was in the crosshairs of Trump and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, has been one of the most downloaded...

Exclusive: U.S. ban on TikTok could cut it off from app stores, advertisers - White House document
Exclusive: U.S. ban on TikTok could cut it off from app stores, advertisers - White House document

President Donald Trump's executive order banning China's TikTok could prevent U.S. app stores from offering the popular short-video app and make advertising on the platform illegal, according to a White House document seen by Reuters. Trump signed an order last week prohibiting transactions with TikTok if its parent ByteDance does not reach a deal to divest it in 45 days. It did not specify the scope of the ban, stating only that the U.S. Department of Commerce would define which transactions would be barred at the end of the 45-day period.

Trump attacks Kamala Harris over Kavanaugh hearings in first remarks since she was named Biden
Trump attacks Kamala Harris over Kavanaugh hearings in first remarks since she was named Biden's running mate

Trump's comments come after the Biden campaign announced Harris as his running mate this fall.

What
What's happened to your second coronavirus stimulus check?

Treasury Secretary Mnuchin says new payments can be sent quick. So where are they?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

  • AHoffGeolla
    (2020-01-02 10:57:01Z)

    give http://cialisle.com/# - cialis no prescription impressive buy generic cialis alone

    REPLY
  • AHoffGeolla
    (2020-01-05 22:26:12Z)

    outside http://cialisle.com/# - cialis online gene buy cialis curious

    REPLY
  • AHoffGeolla
    (2020-01-08 00:06:41Z)

    loud http://cialisle.com/# - buy online cialis build buy online cialis provide

    REPLY
  • AHoffGeolla
    (2020-01-20 02:31:09Z)

    literary http://cialisle.com/# - online cialis district cialis online cheap decade
    hang https://cialsagen.com/# - sildenafil online viagra cheap online online viagra generic reservation

    REPLY
  • AHoffGeolla
    (2020-01-21 19:06:02Z)

    legacy http://cialisoni.com/# - cialis online often online cialis conclusion
    roughly https://cialsagen.com/# - viagra generic online usa pharmacy viagra generic date cheap canadian pharmacy online viagra generic cabinet

    REPLY
  • nwrmxefnwkcb
    (2020-03-21 15:42:23Z)

    pqyctu visit this website www.2usa-pharmacy.usa made a post hxtvau you could try these out sildenafil 20 mg sinldenafil

    REPLY
  • olyzaunpgcel
    (2020-04-15 22:46:47Z)

    sbioav on Bing viacra full report mmlkvl viagra vijagra my review here

    REPLY

Top News: Politics