Justices: Proof needed that person knew he couldn't have gun




Supreme Court
Supreme Court  

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court says prosecutors must prove that people charged with violating federal gun laws knew they were not allowed to have a weapon. The government says the decision could affect thousands of prosecutions of convicted criminals who are barred from having a firearm.

The court ruled 7-2 Friday in the case of a foreign student from the United Arab Emirates who took target practice at a Florida shooting range, even though he had been dismissed from the Florida Institute of Technology and was in the United States illegally. He was prosecuted under a law that bars people who are in the country illegally from having guns.

Prosecutors never proved that the student, Hamid Rehaif, knew he couldn't have a gun, and lower courts ruled they didn't have to.

The same law is also an important tool to keep guns away from convicted criminals. There were more than 6,000 convictions under the law during the government's 2017 fiscal year, according to the U.S. Sentencing Commission.

Justice Stephen Breyer wrote in his majority opinion that the law at issue requires prosecutors to show both that the person had a gun and knew he shouldn't.

Otherwise, Breyer said, the law could ensnare someone "brought into the United States unlawfully as a small child and was therefore unaware of his unlawful status."

Justice Samuel Alito wrote in a dissent that was joined by Justice Clarence Thomas that the decision "opens the gates to a flood of litigation that is sure to burden the lower courts."

The gun violence prevention group Everytown for Gun Safety had joined the Trump administration in urging the court to reject Rehaif's arguments.

"We are concerned today's ruling will make it harder for law enforcement to impose accountability when people keep or acquire guns they're legally barred from possessing, including due to felony and domestic violence convictions," said Eric Tirschwell, Everytown's litigation director.

Rehaif was sentenced to 18 months in prison.

Friday's decision may not be the last word in his case. Lower courts will take a new look at its details, including the school's telling him his student visa would no longer be valid unless he transferred to another school. Prosecutors say Rehaif ignored the warning and instead spent months at a hotel in Melbourne, Florida, never re-enrolling in school.

COMMENTS

More Related News

Trump poised for Supreme Court battle over financial records
Trump poised for Supreme Court battle over financial records
  • US
  • 2019-12-12 12:01:39Z

The U.S. Supreme Court may have a conservative majority that includes two justices appointed by President Donald Trump, but his efforts to shield his tax returns and other financial records from scrutiny still face an uncertain future. The court could decide this week on whether to hear appeals from Trump in three cases he has lost in lower courts. Two of the cases regard such congressional scrutiny.

Justices seem to favor insurers
Justices seem to favor insurers' Obamacare claims for $12B

The Supreme Court appeared likely Tuesday to rule that insurance companies can collect $12 billion from the federal government to cover their losses in the early years of the health care law championed by President Barack Obama. Several justices indicated their agreement with arguments from the insurers that they are entitled to the money under a provision of the "Obamacare" health law that promised the companies a financial cushion for losses they might incur by selling coverage to people in the marketplaces created by the health care law. The program only lasted three years, but Congress inserted a provision in the Health and Human Services Department's spending bills from 2015 to...

U.S. Supreme Court justices lean toward insurers on $12 billion Obamacare claims
U.S. Supreme Court justices lean toward insurers on $12 billion Obamacare claims
  • US
  • 2019-12-10 16:35:52Z

U.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday appeared sympathetic to claims made by health insurers seeking $12 billion from the federal government under a program set up by the Obamacare law aimed at encouraging them to offer medical coverage to previously uninsured Americans. The justices heard a one-hour oral argument over a challenge by a group of insurers of a lower court's ruling that Congress had suspended the government's obligation to make such payments. The insurers have said that ruling, if allowed to stand, would let the government pull a "bait-and-switch" and withhold money the companies were promised.

Trump, Obama advisers say Russia, Iran remain threats to US
Trump, Obama advisers say Russia, Iran remain threats to US
  • World
  • 2019-12-10 15:23:49Z

Russia's challenge to NATO and democratic nations, as well as Iran's influence on the wider Middle East, remain two of the top threats to world peace, two former White House advisers to presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump said Tuesday. The comments by the two former Marine generals, ex-Trump chief of staff John Kelly and Obama national security adviser Jim Jones, mirrored those a day earlier by former Vice President Dick Cheney in Dubai.

Indian government pushing immigration law that singles out Muslims
Indian government pushing immigration law that singles out Muslims

Critics say the law would be unconstitutionally biased, but Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government insists it's "not even 0.001% against India's minorities."

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Europe