Is Flügger group A/S's (CPH:FLUG B) 1.8% ROE Worse Than Average?

  • In Business
  • 2019-05-16 07:21:22Z
  • By Simply Wall St.

Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand Flügger group A/S (CPH:FLUG B).

Flügger group has a ROE of 1.8%, based on the last twelve months. That means that for every DKK1 worth of shareholders' equity, it generated DKK0.018 in profit.

Want to participate in a short research study? Help shape the future of investing tools and you could win a $250 gift card!

Check out our latest analysis for Flügger group

How Do I Calculate ROE?

The formula for ROE is:

Return on Equity = Net Profit ÷ Shareholders' Equity

Or for Flügger group:

1.8% = ø13m ÷ ø740m (Based on the trailing twelve months to January 2019.)

Most know that net profit is the total earnings after all expenses, but the concept of shareholders' equity is a little more complicated. It is all the money paid into the company from shareholders, plus any earnings retained. The easiest way to calculate shareholders' equity is to subtract the company's total liabilities from the total assets.

What Does ROE Mean?

ROE measures a company's profitability against the profit it retains, and any outside investments. The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. The higher the ROE, the more profit the company is making. So, all else equal, investors should like a high ROE. That means ROE can be used to compare two businesses.

Does Flügger group Have A Good ROE?

Arguably the easiest way to assess company's ROE is to compare it with the average in its industry. The limitation of this approach is that some companies are quite different from others, even within the same industry classification. As is clear from the image below, Flügger group has a lower ROE than the average (12%) in the Chemicals industry.

Unfortunately, that's sub-optimal. We prefer it when the ROE of a company is above the industry average, but it's not the be-all and end-all if it is lower. Still, shareholders might want to check if insiders have been selling.

Why You Should Consider Debt When Looking At ROE

Companies usually need to invest money to grow their profits. That cash can come from issuing shares, retained earnings, or debt. In the case of the first and second options, the ROE will reflect this use of cash, for growth. In the latter case, the use of debt will improve the returns, but will not change the equity. Thus the use of debt can improve ROE, albeit along with extra risk in the case of stormy weather, metaphorically speaking.

Flügger group's Debt And Its 1.8% ROE

One positive for shareholders is that Flügger group does not have any net debt! Without a doubt it has a fairly low ROE, but that isn't so bad when you consider it has no debt. At the end of the day, when a company has zero debt, it is in a better position to take future growth opportunities.

The Key Takeaway

Return on equity is a useful indicator of the ability of a business to generate profits and return them to shareholders. In my book the highest quality companies have high return on equity, despite low debt. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt.

But ROE is just one piece of a bigger puzzle, since high quality businesses often trade on high multiples of earnings. It is important to consider other factors, such as future profit growth -- and how much investment is required going forward. Check the past profit growth by Flügger group by looking at this visualization of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.


More Related News

NSE S.A.'s (EPA:ALNSE) Fundamentals Look Pretty Strong: Could The Market Be Wrong About The Stock?

It is hard to get excited after looking at NSE's (EPA:ALNSE) recent performance, when its stock has declined 12% over...

UniDevice AG
UniDevice AG's (ETR:UDC) Stock's On An Uptrend: Are Strong Financials Guiding The Market?

Most readers would already be aware that UniDevice's (ETR:UDC) stock increased significantly by 13% over the past...

Are Poor Financial Prospects Dragging Down Fondia Oyj (HEL:FONDIA Stock?
Are Poor Financial Prospects Dragging Down Fondia Oyj (HEL:FONDIA Stock?

It is hard to get excited after looking at Fondia Oyj's (HEL:FONDIA) recent performance, when its stock has declined...

Declining Stock and Decent Financials: Is The Market Wrong About Nebelhornbahn-Aktiengesellschaft (MUN:NHB)?
Declining Stock and Decent Financials: Is The Market Wrong About Nebelhornbahn-Aktiengesellschaft (MUN:NHB)?

With its stock down 14% over the past three months, it is easy to disregard Nebelhornbahn-Aktiengesellschaft...

Amazon shareholders reject dissident moves to reshape company
Amazon shareholders reject dissident moves to reshape company

Amazon shareholders Wednesday turned back a series of proposals put forth by critics at the company's annual meeting aimed at creating new social responsibility goals for the tech giant. The virtual shareholder meeting rejected all 11 dissident proposals while adopting four measures on board membership, executive compensation and other company business, an Amazon spokesperson said, without elaborating. The measures were backed by a group called Amazon Employees for Climate Justice which contended that "toxicity" pervades the Seattle-based company.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply


Top News: Business