How Michael Flynn's Defense Team Found Powerful Allies

  • In US
  • 2020-06-29 18:47:06Z
  • By The New York Times
How Michael Flynn\
How Michael Flynn\'s Defense Team Found Powerful Allies  

WASHINGTON - Sidney Powell, a firebrand lawyer whose pugnacious Fox News appearances had earned her numerous private phone conversations with President Donald Trump, sent a letter last year to Attorney General William Barr about her soon-to-be new client, Michael Flynn.

Asking for "utmost confidentiality," Powell told Barr that the case against Flynn, the president's former national security adviser who had pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI, smacked of "corruption of our beloved government institutions for what appears to be political purposes." She asked the attorney general to appoint an outsider to review the case, confident that such scrutiny would justify ending it.

Barr did what she wanted. He appointed a U.S. attorney six months later to scour the Flynn case file with a skeptical eye for documents that could be turned over as helpful to the defense. Ultimately, Barr directed the department to drop the charge, one of his numerous steps undercutting the work of the Russia investigation and the special counsel, Robert Mueller.

The private correspondence between Powell and Barr, disclosed in a little-noticed court filing last fall, was the first step toward a once-obscure lawyer and a powerful attorney general finding common cause in a battle to dismantle the legacy of the investigations into Trump and his allies.

Powell's slash-and-burn approach - accusing the federal law enforcement machinery of concocting a case against her client - failed in the courtroom last year when a judge rejected her claims. But the same strategy, which she amplified in frequent media appearances, succeeded in turning Flynn's case into a cause for Trump's supporters and in securing the review ordered by Barr that provided her with fresh ammunition.

Barr's subsequent decision to drop the charge against Flynn threw the Justice Department into turmoil and set up a high-stakes battle pitting the attorney general and Powell against the trial judge, Emmet G. Sullivan, who opened a review of the move.

Powell and her client won a significant victory Wednesday when a divided appeals court panel - in a surprise ruling written by Judge Neomi Rao, a former White House official whom Trump appointed to the bench - ordered Sullivan to drop the case without scrutiny. Sullivan suspended his review but has not dismissed the charge, suggesting that the extraordinary legal and political saga is not yet over.

Powell declined to discuss her conversations with the White House or her correspondence with Barr. But she said in an email that she had long considered "prosecutorial misconduct and overreach" a problem and that she viewed Flynn as a victim of it.

At its core, Flynn's case is a drama about who gets to mete out justice in the Trump era, upending the prosecution of a man who twice had admitted guilt.

"It's hard to think of anything remotely like this," said David Alan Sklansky, a Stanford University law professor and former federal prosecutor. "The Justice Department has taken somebody who has twice pleaded guilty, in a case where the trial judge has considered and already rejected claims of government wrongdoing, and prosecutors now say we'd like to dismiss the case and don't think it should have been brought in the first place."

A Tough-Minded Judge

When Flynn stood in Sullivan's courtroom on Dec. 18, 2018, his legal odyssey appeared to be over. He had struck a favorable deal with Mueller's prosecutors to cooperate after admitting to lying to FBI agents about conversations with the Russian ambassador in late 2016. In exchange, prosecutors were recommending he receive no prison time and not be prosecuted for separate offenses related to his lobbying for the Turkish government without registering as an agent of a foreign power.

But he did not go quietly. His defense team, in a memo laying out what sentence he should receive, also floated the notion that Flynn had been set up. FBI agents had used several tactics to essentially trick Flynn, a retired Army three-star general, into making false statements, the memo suggested.

The Flynn defense team was trying to have it both ways, and Sullivan was furious. He grilled Flynn about whether he was truly taking responsibility for his crimes and even suggested - before retracting the notion - that Flynn had been a traitor to his country. When it appeared that Sullivan might send Flynn to prison, going beyond the original recommendation of prosecutors, Flynn and his lawyer, Robert K. Kelner, decided to postpone the sentencing so he could continue to cooperate with prosecutors.

Sullivan, appointed to the U.S. District Court by President Bill Clinton, has a reputation as a hard-nosed jurist with a disdain for prosecutorial misconduct. He is known for taking guilty pleas seriously, and he reminded Kelner that he had never accepted one from someone who maintained he was not guilty and that he didn't "intend to start today."

In his legal pivot, Flynn had channeled the campaign led by Trump and his allies that had portrayed the Russia investigation as a "witch hunt" and a plot to sabotage his presidency. Since Flynn had first pleaded guilty in 2017, Republicans in Congress had taken up a campaign to undermine the case against him and portray him as a victim of overzealous prosecutors.

Some legal experts speculated at the time that Flynn was accepting guilt to pocket a sentence without prison time while also preserving the possibility that Trump might pardon him. His legal strategy would, soon enough, become even more radical: that he was innocent all along.

Flynn's New Defense

One of Flynn's most vocal defenders was Powell, a Texas-based former federal prosecutor who had made no secret about her view that the Russia investigation was a sham. She appeared frequently on Fox News and had a website hawking T-shirts mocking Mueller's team as "creeps on a mission."

In early 2018, not long after Flynn's original guilty plea, Powell wrote an op-ed alleging that "extraordinary manipulation by powerful people led to the creation of Robert Mueller's continuing investigation and prosecution of General Michael Flynn." She exhorted Flynn to drop his guilty plea and, ironically, praised Sullivan, who had just taken over the case.

She called him the "perfect judge" for it because of his handling years earlier of the corruption case against former Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska. In that case, Sullivan had been so furious after the Justice Department disclosed that it had failed to turn over evidence potentially helpful to the defense that he opened an ethics investigation into the prosecutors.

The department ended up asking Sullivan to dismiss the case despite having won a guilty verdict - an outcome Powell seemed to view as a road map for Flynn.

Her television advocacy on behalf of Flynn appears to have had an influential viewer: the president. The two spoke five times in 2019, during the months before she officially took on Flynn as a client, according to a person familiar with the calls.

It is unclear what they discussed, but when Powell persuaded Flynn and his family to drop his original legal team and allow her to take up the case, the president was thrilled.

"General Michael Flynn, the 33 year war hero who has served with distinction, has not retained a good lawyer, he has retained a GREAT LAWYER, Sidney Powell," Trump tweeted on June 13, 2019. "Best Wishes and Good Luck to them both!"

She previewed her defense strategy in the secret letter to Barr, asking him to begin a hunt for materials that the department could turn over. "At the end of this internal review, we believe there will be ample justification for the department to follow the precedent of the Ted Stevens case and move to dismiss the prosecution of General Flynn in the interest of justice," she wrote.

As Flynn's lawyer, she began demanding that the Justice Department turn over more files, including documents that were tangential to her client's case but promoted other right-wing conspiracy theories about the Russia investigation.

She accused the FBI and prosecutors of engaging in a litany of misconduct that "impugned their entire case against Mr. Flynn, while at the same time putting excruciating pressure on him to enter his guilty plea and manipulating or controlling the press to their advantage to extort that plea."

Exasperated prosecutors attacked Powell's legal strategy, saying the "defendant and his new counsel are in search of a result, not the facts."

She also made clear that her client was done helping the Justice Department. Almost immediately after she began representing Flynn, he changed his story in a prosecution in Virginia against his former business partner about their work for Turkey. Prosecutors decided against calling him as a witness, significantly weakening their case.

A Conservative Cause

Months later, it was Powell's defense of Flynn that was collapsing.

In December, Sullivan delivered a stinging rebuke to her wide-ranging claims of prosecutorial misconduct and other accusations. In a 92-page opinion, he marched through her allegations and rejected each one.

It turned out that Sullivan was not the savior that Powell was looking for; he even ruled that Flynn was no Ted Stevens.

But in a different way, her strategy had been a success: The case had become a political cause. While Sullivan rejected Powell's claims of material law enforcement misconduct as baseless, Fox News and other conservative news outlets had amplified them along the way.

"One of the things that General Flynn wanted to do, he thought it was critically important that we empty out the swamp of all the senior intelligence folks that are in Washington, D.C.," Rep. Devin Nunes, the California Republican on the Intelligence Committee who has been a staunch supporter of Trump and his theories, said to applause at the Conservative Political Action Conference in February. "So they had a real reason to get rid of General Flynn."

This political chorus had already been hard at work trying to undermine the conclusions of the voluminous special counsel's report. Mueller concluded that Russia systematically tried to sabotage the 2016 election and that Trump's advisers had welcomed the help - even if there was insufficient evidence of a criminal conspiracy. He also found numerous times when Trump tried to impede the Russia investigation, but chose not to determine whether the president had illegally obstructed justice.

Weeks after Sullivan rejected Powell's assertions of prosecutorial misconduct and was preparing to sentence Flynn, Powell persuaded her client to ask to withdraw his guilty plea and declare to the judge that he was innocent.

Meanwhile, Barr was moving to take direct control over the U.S. attorney's office for the District of Columbia, which was handling several politically charged matters.

Barr maneuvered the Senate-confirmed U.S. attorney, Jessie K. Liu, into leaving early, and imposed his own aide, Timothy J. Shea, as the acting head of the office. At the same time, he appointed the U.S. attorney for St. Louis, Jeffrey B. Jensen, to examine the Flynn case.

It was exactly what Powell had asked Barr to do in her secret letter six months earlier.

Jensen scoured FBI files in search of anything that could be construed as so-called Brady material - information Flynn could use to argue that he was not guilty - which had been withheld from the defense. He found several files.

Many fell into a category of things that made the FBI look heavy-handed, but did not change the narrow issue of whether Flynn made false statements to the agents who questioned him.

But Powell seized on the revelations as proof that prosecutors had improperly withheld exculpatory evidence, justifying a dismissal of the case. Barr directed his department to file a motion to dismiss the charge.

The remarkable decision infuriated some Justice Department officials and stunned legal experts. Barr defended it last week in an interview with NPR as appropriate.

It also forced a showdown with Sullivan, who had no intention of abandoning the case so easily.

Sullivan ordered a new review, appointing John Gleeson, a former Mafia prosecutor and a retired federal judge from New York City to argue against the Justice Department's motion. In a scathing memo, Gleeson urged Sullivan to sentence Flynn anyway, over prosecutors' objections.

Trying to head that off, Powell asked an appeals panel to order Sullivan to end the case without any review of the motivation or legitimacy of the request. Legal experts widely scoffed at her tactic, noting that such orders are supposed to be reserved for rare problems where no other option exists.

But Powell's gambit led to a stroke of luck. The case was randomly assigned to a three-judge panel that included Rao and Judge Karen L. Henderson, a 1990 appointee of President George H.W. Bush, who have both proved more willing than most of their colleagues to interpret the law in Trump's favor in politically charged cases.

In a 2-1 ruling, the panel ordered Sullivan to shut down the case immediately, saying he had no authority to scrutinize the basis for Barr's decision. The dissenting judge on the panel accused his colleagues of "grievously" overstepping their authority.

The ruling turned on a technical question rather than the merits of the case, and it remains to be seen whether the full appeals court will let it stand.

But Trump and his allies have declared victory, inaccurately portraying the decision as proof that Flynn has been exonerated and should never have been charged.

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

© 2020 The New York Times Company


More Related News

Lindsey Graham Uses Benghazi to Defend Trump on Russian Bounties
Lindsey Graham Uses Benghazi to Defend Trump on Russian Bounties

Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) was among the loudest Republican voices in Congress screaming about the attack on U.S. diplomats in Benghazi, Libya back in 2012. But he apparently has no problem with President Donald Trump's decision to ignore intelligence about Russian bounties on American soldiers in Afghanistan. In fact, during a Thursday morning appearance on Fox & Friends, Graham actually used the Benghazi attack to defend Trump and accuse his Democratic colleagues of hypocrisy.After co-host Brian Kilmeade quoted Rep. Seth Moulton (D-MA), who accused Trump of committing "treason," Graham fired back by asking: "Where were all these Democrats when Benghazi was on fire, when they were...

Trump calls proposed Black Lives Matter mural outside Trump Tower
Trump calls proposed Black Lives Matter mural outside Trump Tower 'a symbol of hate'

New York Mayor Bill de Blasio said painting Black Lives Matter on Fifth Avenue is designed in part to send a message to President Trump.

Trump Says Coronavirus Will Just
Trump Says Coronavirus Will Just 'Disappear,' Brags He Looks Like 'Lone Ranger' in Mask

With coronavirus cases surging to all-time highs and states reversing reopening plans, President Donald Trump once again claimed on Wednesday that the deadly virus would eventually just "disappear." At the same time, the president appeared to change his tune on face-coverings, telling Fox Business that he's "all for masks" while boasting about the single time that he was spotted wearing one, claiming he thought he "looked OK" and that he resembled the "Lone Ranger."Speaking to Fox Business host Blake Burman from the White House, the president bragged that the economy is recovering in a "very strong fashion" as states reopen businesses and public spaces following stay-at-home orders. "And...

Exclusive USA TODAY poll: Biden widens his lead, but Trump keeps the edge on enthusiasm
Exclusive USA TODAY poll: Biden widens his lead, but Trump keeps the edge on enthusiasm

In a new USA TODAY/Suffolk Poll, the president falls further behind in a race where much of Biden's support comes from those opposed to Trump.

Meet the Supporters Trump Has Lost
Meet the Supporters Trump Has Lost

For some, the disenchantment started almost as soon as Donald Trump took office. For others, his handling of the coronavirus and social unrest turned them away. For all of them, it is highly unlikely they will vote for him again.These voters, who backed Trump in 2016 but say there is "not really any chance" they will this year, represent just 2% of registered voters in the six states most likely to decide the presidency, according to New York Times/Siena College polls. But they help explain why the president faces a significant deficit nationwide and in the battleground states."I think if he weren't such an appalling human being, he would make a great president, because I think what this...

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply


Top News: US