Founders wanted a powerful president




Founders wanted a powerful president
Founders wanted a powerful president  

The frenzied reaction by some to Attorney General William Barr's speech on the constitutional scope of executive authority was baffling.

In it, Barr addressed the unitary executive doctrine, which maintains that the executive power is vested solely in the president and can be exercised only under his supervision.

This isn't a novel ideal. The first line of Article II of the Constitution states: "The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America."

And Thomas Jefferson said: "For the prompt, clear, and consistent action so necessary in an Executive, unity of person is necessary."

OUR VIEW: Ruling reminds public that 'presidents are not kings'

Yet, Barr explained: "Over the past several decades we have seen the steady encroachment on executive authority by the other branches of government" which "has substantially weakened the function of the presidency to the detriment of the nation."

In his view, the president's "ability to act in areas in which he has discretion has become smothered by the encroachments of the other branches."

He's right. The trend has accelerated with the frenetic opposition to President Donald Trump. Many on the left, including - perhaps especially - those in Congress, have made it their mission to hinder and undermine his government.

Consider Congress's unprecedented obstruction of executive branch nominees. Or the "deep state" employees in the executive branch who delay or undermine the president's agenda. In short, the executive is deluged by what Barr called "a war to cripple, by any means necessary, a duly elected government."

The unitary executive is one of the most brilliant innovations in the Constitution. As Barr explained, it "has brought to our republic a dynamism and effectiveness that other democracies have lacked."

This is true whether the president is a Republican or Democrat. Those who oppose Trump should recognize that, and think twice before they tear down our constitutional structure just to topple the man temporarily on top of it.

GianCarlo Canaparo is a legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation.

If you can't see the poll below, please refresh the story page.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Founders wanted powerful president: Opposing view

COMMENTS

More Related News

Kellyanne Conway says Martin Luther King Jr. would have opposed Donald Trump
Kellyanne Conway says Martin Luther King Jr. would have opposed Donald Trump's impeachment

Kellyanne Conway's comments to NBC News came the day before the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump is expected to begin.

Donald Trump
Donald Trump's lawyers say impeachment case is insufficient, unconstitutional

Trump's new legal team says the two impeachment articles against him do not allege any high crime or misdemeanor as required by the Constitution.

Barron Trump is really tall, and people are joking he could be a future NBA star
Barron Trump is really tall, and people are joking he could be a future NBA star

The 13-year-old was pictured towering over his six feet, three inch father as he boarded Marine One on Friday.

House Democrats call Trump a
House Democrats call Trump a 'danger' to U.S. national security in formal argument for his removal

Trump's legal team told the Senate that impeachment was an attempt to overturn the 2016 election and that the articles were legally defective.

Inside look at Melania Trump
Inside look at Melania Trump's daily diet, including her favorite meal

A former model, Melania is no stranger to a healthy lifestyle.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Latin America