Fact check: Cloth masks ineffective against wildfire smoke, still slow spread of COVID-19




  • In Business
  • 2020-09-15 17:19:38Z
  • By USA TODAY
 

The claim: Face masks cannot protect against inhaling wildfire smoke particulates so they are also ineffective against COVID-19

West Coast states are experiencing some of the worst wildfires on record amid the most infectious global pandemic in a century. An epidemic of misinformation is also hurting efforts to combat the natural disasters.

An image shared on Facebook juxtaposes a statement about the average size of coronavirus and wildfire smoke particulates with a screen-grabbed CDC tweet that states cloth face masks do not protect against wildfire smoke. "They do not catch small particles found in wildfire smoke that can harm your health," the CDC states.

California ablaze:Striking satellite imagery shows how the fires are unfolding

There are red lines drawn between the numbers and the CDC statement to connect the two. The implication appears to be that face masks do not protect against either coronavirus or wildfire particulates, as viral particles are on average smaller - at "0.12-0.3 microns" - than smoke - "at 0.7-0.4 microns." USA TODAY reached out to the original poster of the image for comment.

The claim is misleading as it misinterprets both why cloth masks are ineffective against protecting people from the effects of wildfire smoke as well as why they are useful in slowing the spread of the coronavirus.

Fact check: 2016 photo of Smokies firefighters miscaptioned to claim connection to 2020 wildfires

Masks, respirators and wildfire smoke

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has emphasized that cloth masks are not effective at protecting people from inhaling wildfire smoke. The agency urges that people refrain from being outside and risking exposure to heavy particulates.

"Cloth masks that are used to slow the spread of COVID-19 by blocking respiratory droplets offer little protection against wildfire smoke," an agency blog entry reads. "They do not catch small, harmful particles in smoke that can harm your health."

This statement underscores a truth about cloth masks: They are less effective at stopping the inhalation of dangerous particles.

Fact check: Document claiming to show CDC guidance about masks is a fake

However, the CDC notes that higher quality "N95 respirators do provide protection from wildfire smoke" but that "they might be in short supply as frontline health care workers use them during the pandemic."

The Environmental Protection Agency also states that "people who must be outside for extended periods of time" during fires "may benefit from using a tight-fitting N95 or P100 respirator to reduce their exposure."

This is because properly worn respirators are a strong enough filter to stop smoke particles from entering a person's lungs, where ash, smog and other compounds can inflict serious harm to the body.

For many people living near wildfires, the debris and smoke is inescapable. Air quality in many regions on the West Coast has reached toxic levels.

Fact check: Ear loop masks, homemade cloth masks, offer protection against COVID-19

"My advice to the public is that people should be sheltering in place as much as possible," said John Balmes, a professor of medicine at University of California, San Francisco. "Stay home with windows closed, ventilation turned to recirculate, and if possible, have a clean air room with a HEPA air purifying appliance."

This reality with wildfires is a different dynamic from the role that respirators and cloth masks can play in slowing the spread of the coronavirus.

Fact check: Image depicts sunset over Hawaii, not California fires below clouds

Cloth masks, coronavirus and wildfires

Cloth masks and other nonmedical grade face coverings are effective at slowing the spread of the coronavirus not because they are the best way to stop a person from inhaling infectious particles and droplets.

Rather, face coverings are widely mandated because they make it more difficult for infected people to spread the virus in the first place.

"Masks are recommended as a simple barrier to help prevent respiratory droplets from traveling into the air and onto other people when the person wearing the mask coughs, sneezes, talks, or raises their voice. This is called source control," the CDC states in its guidelines.

Fact check: What's true and what's false about face masks?

SARS-CoV-2, the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19, is mostly spread through droplets and other particulates, which people can share by coughing, sneezing, singing, talking or yelling.

While face coverings like cloth masks are only marginally effective at stopping all viral particles from being inhaled, they are more effective at stopping people from putting more particles into their environment.

This means that when large majorities of the public wear face masks, the aggregate effect can seriously slow the spread of a respiratory disease like COVID-19.

"COVID-19 can be spread by people who do not have symptoms and do not know that they are infected. That's why it's important for everyone to wear masks in public settings and practice social distancing," the CDC emphasizes.

'War zone': Deadly wildfires rage in Western states: Death toll rises as hundreds of thousands evacuate

Scientists are still debating just how effective cloth masks are at protecting an individual person.

While the combined effect of slowing contagion is the true value of simple face coverings, researchers do believe that cloth masks provide some form of personal protection against coronavirus and are just uncertain how much.

Fact check: Oregon, Washington fires were not set by anti-fascist activists

A complicated public messaging campaign

Face masks have been the subject of confusion and scrutiny during the coronavirus pandemic. In the USA, this has partly come from mixed messaging from government agencies like the CDC, as well as the Trump administration.

Public guidelines urging the wearing of face masks have evolved over the course of the pandemic. Health officials, aware of how most widely available masks don't provide the personal protection that medical grade respirators offer, were at first hesitant to encourage widespread mask-wearing.

Fauci: Extreme partisanship has made it harder for US to respond to coronavirus

The CDC reversed messaging when it became apparent that Americans could make and wear enough cloth masks to slow the virus's spread.

The West Coast's wildfires are now making officials concerned that many won't be able to distinguish between symptoms from exposure to wildfire smoke and COVID-19.

Fact check:Masks can keep out COVID-19 particles even though smaller than dry wall dust

The CDC and state public health departments have issued guidelines for how to distinguish between the symptoms, measures to protect against wildfire smoke and coronavirus, and advise that people should support each other in this time of crisis.

"Some people most vulnerable to wildfire smoke, like those over 65 or with preexisting conditions, are also those most at risk for serious impacts from COVID-19. Check on your neighbors and make sure they know how to keep the air clean in their homes," a Medium post from the Washington Department of Health reads.

Fact check: White House didn't fire pandemic response unit when it was disbanded in 2018

Our ruling: Missing context

Cloth masks are not granular enough to protect against smoke and airborne particles from the wildfires gripping the Western USA, according to CDC guidelines. The CDC and other agencies still endorse masks for slowing the spread of COVID-19 because of their usefulness if widely adopted. N95 respirators and similar quality personal protective equipment protect against both wildfires smoke and coronavirus particles but are being reserved for health care workers and first responders. We rate this claim as MISSING CONTEXT, based on our research.

Our fact-check sources:

Thank you for supporting our journalism. You can subscribe to our print edition, ad-free app or electronic newspaper replica here.

Our fact check work is supported in part by a grant from Facebook.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Fact check: Cloth masks ineffective in wildfires, helpful for COVID-19

COMMENTS

More Related News

The Latest: India
The Latest: India's daily cases continue downward trend

India has registered 88,600 new confirmed coronavirus cases in the past 24 hours in a declining trend with recoveries exceeding daily infections. The Health Ministry on Sunday also reported additional 1,124 deaths for a total of 94,503.

Mushroom recall: Wood ear mushrooms likely linked to salmonella outbreak shipped to restaurants in 30-plus states
Mushroom recall: Wood ear mushrooms likely linked to salmonella outbreak shipped to restaurants in 30-plus states

The FDA and CDC are investigating a multi-state outbreak of salmonella infections that has sickened 41 and is likely linked to wood ear mushrooms.

Coronavirus updates: 9% of American adults exposed to COVID-19; world deaths could double before a vaccine is widely available, WHO warns
Coronavirus updates: 9% of American adults exposed to COVID-19; world deaths could double before a vaccine is widely available, WHO warns

Texas A&M;'s Midnight Yell was a little "eerie" with no fans. Florida is easing more restrictions. California is seeing more cases. Latest COVID news.

An airport in Finland is using dogs to detect the coronavirus, and researchers say they are
An airport in Finland is using dogs to detect the coronavirus, and researchers say they are 'close to 100%' accuracy

Finland's Helsinki-Vantaa airport is running a trial to let dogs test travelers for the coronavirus, saying it could be better than laboratory tests.

2 former leaders of Holyoke Soldiers
2 former leaders of Holyoke Soldiers' Home charged in COVID-19 deaths
  • US
  • 2020-09-25 20:32:00Z

Two former leaders of the Holyoke Soldiers' Home in Massachusetts have been indicted in connection with the COVID-19 deaths of nearly a dozen veterans, Attorney General Maura Healey announced Friday. Former Superintendent Bennett Walsh and former Medical Director Dr. David Clinton each have been charged with criminal neglect following an investigation into the facility, where at least 76 residents died of COVID-19. Each defendant is facing five counts of charges of caretaker who wantonly or recklessly commits or permits bodily injury to an elder or disabled person, and five counts of caretaker who wantonly or recklessly commits or permits abuse, neglect or mistreatment to an elder or...

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Business