Elizabeth Warren says 'no' to bipartisan bill aimed at federal abortion protections. Here's why.

  • In Politics
  • 2022-08-03 20:46:37Z

WASHINGTON - Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., said on Tuesday she will not vote for a bipartisan bill introduced Monday that would provide federal abortion protections because it does not go far enough.

The bill, which was created as an answer to the Supreme Court's ruling to overturn Roe v. Wade in June, is likely to fail because it needs all 50 Democratic senators and at least 10 Republicans on board to bypass a filibuster..

Warren, a longtime abortion rights advocate, said in an interview with NBC News that the measure "does not codify Roe," adding "no," she will not support it.

Biden signs executive order: Biden to sign executive order supporting people traveling out of state for an abortion

She said the issue is that the bill is "not an obvious improvement over where we stand right now."

Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., one of the sponsors of the measure, said on NBC Monday that the bill did not have the 60 votes necessary, but hopes the "post-Dobbs reality of 10 year-olds being smuggled across state borders," would help the legislation pass.

Kaine, was referencing the case of a 10-year-old Ohio rape victim who crossed state lines into Indiana for an abortion. Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization was the Supreme Court ruling that overturned Roe.

President Joe Biden, on Wednesday, signed an executive order to offer protection for people traveling out of state for an abortion.

10-year-old travels out of state for abortion: An Ohio 10-year-old crossed state lines for abortion care in Indiana. She isn't alone

The Reproduction Freedom to Protect All act, which was introduced by Kaine, along with Sens. Lisa Murkowski, R-Ala., Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., and Susan Collins, D-Maine, Monday according to a press release from Collins's office would:

  • Forbid state regulations that force an undue burden on a woman's access to pre-viability abortions, while allowing states to enact reasonable restrictions on post-viability abortions - given that states cannot ban abortions that are necessary to protect the life or health of the mother.

  • Protect access to contraceptives

  • Keep conscience protections

Roe overturned: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, eliminating constitutional right to abortion


This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Abortion rights: Sen. Elizabeth Warren will vote no on bipartisan bill


More Related News

Latin America
Latin America's road to legalizing same-sex marriage

Pre-2010 - Only a handful of countries worldwide recognize same-sex marriage, mostly in Europe. Civil unions grant some marital rights for couples in...

Most women think US leaders are
Most women think US leaders are 'out of touch' when it comes to abortion: poll

A new Insider/Morning Consult survey indicates most women believe Congress, SCOTUS, and the executive branch don't represent their views on abortion.

Searching for a nursing home? Biden administration takes
Searching for a nursing home? Biden administration takes 'unprecedented step' to release ownership data

The nursing home data is part of the Biden administration's effort to shine a light on an industry that receives substantial federal funding.

Hurricane Ian barrels toward Florida
Hurricane Ian barrels toward Florida's Gulf Coast, canceling Biden rally and bringing Ron DeSantis his biggest storm test as governor

The Republican governor warned about "significant flooding" in Tampa, as well as power outages, fuel interruptions, and traffic backups in areas that are...

Will U.S. Supreme Court hear another case from Oklahoma linked to McGirt ruling?
Will U.S. Supreme Court hear another case from Oklahoma linked to McGirt ruling?
  • US
  • 2022-09-26 13:00:43Z

U.S. Supreme Court is being urged by Oklahoma to issue a ruling on the definition of 'Indian' under federal criminal law.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply


Top News: Politics