Divided Supreme Court makes it easier to detain noncitizens with criminal records




  • In Business
  • 2019-03-19 15:23:05Z
  • By USA TODAY
 

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court handed the Trump administration a victory Tuesday by making it easier to detain noncitizens with criminal records.

The justices reversed a lower court decision that required immigration officials to detain those immigrants almost immediately after their release from jail or prison, rather than months or even years later. Advocates for immigrants had argued that such detentions must occur within 24 hours.

The 5-4 ruling was a victory for the court's conservative justices, who complained during oral argument in October that the government cannot detain every immigrant immediately - particularly when money and manpower are limited, and state and local governments may be opposed.

It was the first decision of the court's term - it began in October -

in which the justices broke down along strictly ideological lines. Associate Justice Samuel Alito wrote the opinion and was joined by four conservatives. Associate Justice Stephen Breyer issued a dissent on behalf of the liberals.

Alito sought to make clear that the ruling was not aimed at "extreme" examples of people picked up years after they have finished serving time, when they are leading law-abiding lives and have blended into their communities. Those immigrants can file individual challenges, he said.

But it would be unreasonable, Alito said, for homeland security agents to "turn into pumpkins" at midnight on the day noncitizens are released, forever unable to detain them. Various deadlines suggested by the other side, he said, "are taken out of thin air."

Breyer delivered his dissent from the bench, which is rarely done, to warn that the decision gives too much power to the federal government.

"It is a power to detain persons who committed a minor crime many years before," he said. "And it is a power to hold those persons, perhaps for many months, without any opportunity to obtain bail."

Immigration is an issue that frequently divides the high court. In February 2018, the justices ruled 5-3 that detained non-citizens lack the right to periodic bond hearings. In April, they ruled 5-4 that a law subjecting non-citizens to deportation for crimes of violence was unconstitutionally vague, with Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch joining a liberal majority.

And in June, the conservative majority in a 5-4 ruling upheld President Donald Trump's ban on travel from five predominantly Muslim countries.

The class action case was brought by two lawful permanent residents who were taken into custody years after their release from prison. Both eventually received bond hearings and were allowed to stay in the country.

The Trump administration appealed lower court rulings in favor of the immigrants, and the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case last spring, before Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy retired and was replaced by Brett Kavanaugh.

During oral argument, American Civil Liberties Union lawyer Cecillia Wang said the law requires the government to detain immigrants on the same day their prison terms are completed. Several conservative justices said that was impossible.

"It's not reasonable if they don't have enough people to do it," Chief Justice John Roberts said. "I don't know what's reasonable in this situation. A month?"

Kavanaugh said Congress sought "harshness" in 1996 to crack down on illegal immigration and would not have wanted limits on the ability to detain ex-cons.

"Congress, wisely or not, thought that this class of aliens was dangerous, and they should not be trusted," Alito added at the time.

But the court's four liberal justices said the government shouldn't be allowed to pick up undocumented immigrants years or even decades after they have reintegrated into their communities, particularly without a bond hearing.

"There's a constitutional problem in a country which gives every triple ax murderer a bail hearing, but these people don't," Breyer said.

Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the number of illegal immigrants who are recidivists pales compared to a "huge class of people who are being held, where no one would consider them dangerous."

More: President Trump bets big on Supreme Court to uphold controversial policies after lower court losses

More: Supreme Court seems divided on Virginia's use of race to draw election districts

More: Supreme Court turns down Trump request to restart asylum ban

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Divided Supreme Court makes it easier to detain noncitizens with criminal records

COMMENTS

More Related News

Dems clash with Trump officials on subpoenas, tax returns
Dems clash with Trump officials on subpoenas, tax returns

WASHINGTON (AP) - The struggle between House Democrats and the Trump administration over investigations intensified Tuesday as a former White House official defied a subpoena and the Treasury Department ignored a deadline for providing President Donald Trump's tax returns.

Hillary Clinton: Mueller report is beginning, not the end
Hillary Clinton: Mueller report is beginning, not the end

Special counsel Robert Mueller's report is only the beginning of a reckoning on election meddling, not the end, and "raises some serious questions," Hillary Clinton said Tuesday. The former Democratic presidential candidate stopped short of calling for immediate impeachment proceedings

Harris joins impeachment call during Democratic town hall
Harris joins impeachment call during Democratic town hall

California Sen. Kamala Harris joined the call for President Donald Trump's impeachment on Monday as five leading Democratic presidential contenders clashed in a series of prime-time town hall meetings that exposed deep divisions in a party desperate to end the Trump presidency. Harris' unexpected

Impeach or not impeach? Dems wrestle with Mueller report
Impeach or not impeach? Dems wrestle with Mueller report

WASHINGTON (AP) - Democrats are trying to make President Donald Trump's conduct part of their 2020 election push, but they're struggling over whether to actually try and impeach him.

Trump, business organization sue Democratic House chairman
Trump, business organization sue Democratic House chairman

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Donald Trump and his business organization sued the Democratic chairman of the House oversight committee on Monday to block a subpoena that seeks years of the president's financial records.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Business

facebook
Hit "Like"
Don't miss any important news
Thanks, you don't need to show me this anymore.