Democrats Warn Of Massive Consequences After Assassination Of Soleimani

  • In Politics
  • 2020-01-03 05:49:02Z
  • By HuffPost
Democrats Warn Of Massive Consequences After Assassination Of Soleimani
Democrats Warn Of Massive Consequences After Assassination Of Soleimani  

The Pentagon admitted Thursday to having killed a senior Iranian commander, Gen. Qassem Suleimani, a staggering move made without congressional authority that has left Democrats angry and concerned about the United States' fragile relationship with Iran.

The U.S. launched strikes against targets linked to Iran, officials told Reuters. The strike at the Baghdad International Airport in Iraq killed five people, including Soleimani and Abu Mahdi-Muhandis, a pro-Iranian militia leader who was a senior official in Iraq's government-linked Popular Mobilization Forces, according to The New York Times.

"The strike was aimed at deterring future Iranian attack plans," the Pentagon said in a statement on the death of Soleimani, a giant force of influence in the Middle East. "The United States will continue to take all necessary action to protect our people and our interest wherever they are around the world."

Though nearly all Democrats agreed that Soleimani was a feared and ruthless military commander, they also stressed concern about the lack of transparency regarding the strikes, as well as about the long-term consequences for the U.S. and whether the move will result in war.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Thursday that the airstrike "risks provoking further dangerous escalation of violence" and that Congress must be immediately briefed on the administration's next steps, according to NBC News.

"The Administration has conducted tonight's strikes in Iraq targeting high-level Iranian military officials ... without an Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) against Iran," Pelosi said in a statement. "Further, this action was taken without the consultation of Congress."

Several members of the Democratic-controlled chamber, including in the House Foreign Affairs Committee, also spoke out against the strike.

"This strike went forward with no notification or consultation with Congress," committee Chairman Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.) said in a statement Thursday. "Even if this strike was in self-defense, no current congressional authorization covered it and the President needs to notify Congress within 48 hours pursuant to the War Powers Resolution. The law requires notification so the President can't plunge the United States into ill-considered wars."

Sen. Chuck Schumer, the upper chamber's top Democrat, was not given any advance notice of the airstrike, according to an aide.

Several other senators, specifically Democrats on the Foreign Relations Committee, spoke out Thursday night. A spokesperson for the committee's top Democrat, Bob Menendez of New Jersey, declined to immediately comment but told HuffPost that the senator will deliver a statement on the airstrikes Friday morning.

"Soleimani was an enemy of the United States. That's not a question," committee member Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) wrote on Twitter. "The question is this ― as reports suggest, did America just assassinate, without any congressional authorization, the second most powerful person in Iran, knowingly setting off a potential massive regional war?"

Murphy added: "The justification for the assassination is to 'deter future Iranian attacks.' One reason we don't generally assasinate foreign political officials is the belief that such action will get more, not less, Americans killed. That should be our real, pressing and grave worry tonight."

Other Democrats on the committee, such as Sen. Tom Udall of New Mexico, said that Trump is bringing the U.S. "to the brink of an illegal war with Iran."

"Passing our bipartisan amendment to prevent unconstitutional war with Iran is urgent," Udall tweeted. "Congress needs to step in immediately."

Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), a member of the committee and a 2020 presidential candidate, was more hesitant in his response Thursday, telling CNN that Suleimani had "American blood on his hands" but that he's concerned about Trump's lack of foreign policy strategy in Iran and the Middle East in general.

Other 2020 candidates, including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), former Vice President Joe Biden and businessman Andrew Yang, also spoke out Thursday against the decision to kill Suleimani.

"When I voted against the war in Iraq in 2002, I feared it would lead to greater destabilization of the region. That fear unfortunately turned out to be true. The U.S. has lost approximately 4,500 brave troops, tens of thousands have been wounded, and we've spent trillions," Sanders tweeted.

"Trump's dangerous escalation brings us closer to another disastrous war in the Middle East that could cost countless lives and trillions more dollars," he added. "Trump promised to end endless wars, but this action puts us on the path to another one."

Not every 2020 Democratic candidate had an immediate response to the reports, though. Spokespeople for Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (Hawaii) and former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg ― candidates who both served in the military ― did not immediately respond to HuffPost's request for comment.

Love HuffPost? Become a founding member of HuffPost Plus today.


Iranian Commander Qassem Soleimani Assassinated By U.S. In Baghdad Airstrike

Top Senate Democrat Received No Advance Notice Of U.S. Strike On Iran General

Republicans Celebrate Trump's Targeted Killing Of Top Iranian General

This article originally appeared on HuffPost.


More Related News

Trump says
Trump says 'America is thriving' at Davos, Switzerland, economic forum before impeachment trial

Before his speech at the World Economic Forum, Trump told reporters impeachment is "just a hoax" and "a witch hunt that's been going on for years."

Iran MP offers reward for killing Trump, U.S. calls it
Iran MP offers reward for killing Trump, U.S. calls it 'ridiculous'

An Iranian lawmaker offered a $3 million reward to anyone who killed U.S. President Donald Trump and said Iran could avoid threats if it had nuclear arms, ISNA news agency reported on Tuesday amid Tehran's latest standoff with Washington. U.S. disarmament ambassador Robert Wood dismissed the reward

How Trump Twisted Iran Intel to Manufacture the
How Trump Twisted Iran Intel to Manufacture the 'Four Embassies' Threat
  • World
  • 2020-01-21 02:04:13Z

When President Donald Trump publicly claimed earlier this month that he had seen intel showing Iran's now-deceased top military leader Qassem Soleimani was plotting attacks on "four [American] embassies," senior officials in Trump's national-security apparatus shook their heads. They weren't sure exactly why the president leaned on that particular talking point, and scrambled in the following days to formulate answers to a barrage of questions from the media on exactly what the president had meant. Other officials wondered aloud whether the president had misrepresented the intelligence. "There were definitely questions [at the time, internally] about whether he had just made it up on the...

'Sorry for Lying to You for 13 Years': Iranian State TV Host Turns on Regime after Ukrainian Jet Downing

A number of Iranian TV hosts and other public personalities have denounced the regime in the wake of Iran's missile strike on a Ukrainian passenger jet that killed 176 people after the military mistook the jet for an enemy target."Apologies for lying to you for 13 years," state TV host of "Good Morning Iran" Gelareh Jabbari posted on Instagram last Monday. "It was very hard for me to believe our people have been killed, forgive me for believing this late."The post, which was seen by NBC News, has since been deleted.Taraneh Alidoosti, one of Iran's most popular actors and a star of the Oscar-winning 2016 movie The Salesman, also criticized the regime in a post...

'OK, Now What?': Inside Team Trump's Scramble to Sell the Soleimani Hit to America
  • World
  • 2020-01-19 10:04:26Z

In the hours after the killing of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani on Jan. 3, U.S. officials in the White House, Pentagon, and State Department worked overtime on assembling a plan to handle the fallout, only to watch senior administration officials and the president himself scuttle their effort in real time on national television. The ensuing days became a mad dash to reconcile the intense intra-administration tensions over what the intelligence actually said about Iranian plots, and how best to sell their case to the American public. At the very top was a president who stewed and complained to staff about how the killing he'd just ordered might negatively affect his re-election...

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply


Top News: Politics