Democrats Con Their Base with Green New Deal




 

Given the incredible speed of the Twitter-driven news cycle, it's often hard to stay focused on the developments that truly matter. In the days since Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senator Ed Markey unveiled their "Green New Deal," we've seen the headlines lurch from new rape allegations against Virginia lieutenant governor Justin Fairfax, to confusion and lies about a background document issued by Ocasio-Cortez's office that contained some, ahem, vivid interpretations of the Green New Deal (upgrading every building in ten years, sustaining people "unwilling" to work, phasing out nuclear power, and - of course - "farting cows"), and now to anti-Semitic tweets from one of the most celebrated freshman Democrats in Congress.

Each of these mini-tempests is interesting, but let's keep our eyes on the ball. This is actually important:


And so is this:


For those keeping score at home, that's five prominent contenders for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination embracing the Green New Deal. They haven't just made vague promises to "combat climate change" or "reduce greenhouse gases." They've signed on to a specific document with specific provisions that urge a series of truly immense political, economic, and cultural changes to fundamentally remake the United States.

Forget the Ocasio-Cortez background document; the actual Green New Deal is extraordinarily radical. It calls for a ten-year "national mobilization" to not only achieve "net zero" emissions but also provide "economic security for all people of the United States." This means meeting 100 percent of America's power demand "through clean, renewable, and zero-emission energy sources." It does appear that many Green New Deal proponents do at least include nuclear power in that mix, but even with nuclear power, that single plank of the Green New Deal is, well, a practical impossibility.

As Slate's Mike Pesca writes:

And we haven't even gotten to the other elements of the plan, such as "overhauling transportation systems in the United States," "restoring and protecting threatened, endangered, and fragile ecosystems," and "providing resources, training, and high-quality education, including higher education, to all people of the United States." Do I need to bring up the promise to "guarantee a job with a family-sustaining wage, adequate family and medical leave, paid vacations, and retirement security to all people of the United States"? Should I even mention the pledge to provide "all people of the United States" with "high-quality health care"?

Look back at the list of presidential-candidate endorsers of this plan, all experienced politicians, all with years of experience working through the American legislative process. Now look back at the promises above. If you believe for one second that any material provision of the Green New Deal will become policy, you're being conned.

A competent media could and should prove as much in mere moments. A competent media could and should ask Kamala Harris at every campaign stop for her precise plan to "guarantee a job with a family-sustaining wage" to every person in the U.S. A competent media could and should rush to press Elizabeth Warren about her precise plan to completely overhaul American power generation in a mere ten-year span without crushing the economy.

After all, if a series of Republican presidential candidates pledged together to, say, abolish Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid yet still also guarantee health care and retirement security for all Americans, wouldn't the media be extremely curious as to how they could pull off such an astounding achievement? The press relentlessly and rightfully pressed Donald Trump on the feasibility of his most outrageous campaign pledges. And, by the way, building a wall and making Mexico pay for it is child's play compared with the promises in the Green New Deal.

There's even cover on the left for aggressive, informed questioning. Thoughtful progressives, including Jonathan Chait and others, have excoriated the Green New Deal. Nancy Pelosi is singularly unimpressed. And there is a real need for more like them.

To some, the Green New Deal shows "how grand climate politics can be." To others, it's an idea whose "time has come." It's what Democratic young people really, really want. Spend five seconds online or on Twitter, and you'll find a host of progressives simply outraged at the notion that the Green New Deal is impossible or unaffordable. These folks need a public education every bit as intense as the public education attempted after each of Donald Trump's wildest claims or proposals.

Call me a cynic, but I somehow doubt we'll see it. For all too many members of the political class, words and promises matter far less than whom you're with, and whom you're against. If AOC is for a Green New Deal, then the Democratic contenders will back it, because hers promises to be arguably the second-most-coveted endorsement (after Obama's) in the 2020 primaries. If AOC triggers Fox News more than any other Democratic politician, then the Democratic contenders will stand firmly behind her every move.

And so the very same people who laughed at Trump supporters and called them rubes for believing Trump's promises now indulge progressives who believe even more insane promises. This time it's the Democrats' turn to tell the wildest tales. It seems they aren't above Trump-style politics after all.

COMMENTS

More Related News

It's time for nations to unite around an International Green New Deal
It's time for nations to unite around an International Green New Deal

Several countries have proposed their own versions of a Green New Deal, but climate change knows no borders. We need a global response 'The stakes of the international Green New Deal are not merely environmental.' Photograph: Craig Easton/Getty Images/Cultura RF In times of crisis and catastrophe, children are often forced to grow up quickly. We are now witnessing this premature call to action on a planetary scale. As the adults in government accelerate their consumption of fossil fuels, children are leading the campaign against our species' looming extinction. Our survival now depends on the prospects for a global movement to follow their lead and demand an International Green New...

On South America
On South America's largest solar farm, Chinese power radiates
  • World
  • 2019-04-23 05:55:00Z

Local officials said they had sought help at home, the United States and Europe without success. Potential lenders and partners, they said, were spooked by the project's size and the fiscal woes of Jujuy province, one of the poorest in the country. The Import-Export Bank of China saw it differently.

Mueller report: 5 things to know about Russian interference in U.S. elections
Mueller report: 5 things to know about Russian interference in U.S. elections

A Kremlin-led operation to upend the the 2016 U.S. presidential election was so successful that experts warn the Russians are certain to try again.

U.S. to announce end to sanctions waivers for Iran oil imports: source
U.S. to announce end to sanctions waivers for Iran oil imports: source
  • World
  • 2019-04-22 03:08:34Z

The United States is expected to announce on Monday that all importers of Iranian oil will have to end their imports shortly or be subject to U.S. sanctions, a source familiar with the situation told Reuters. The source confirmed a report by a Washington Post columnist that the administration will terminate the sanctions waivers it had granted to some importers of Iranian oil late last year. U.S. President Donald Trump has been clear to his national security team over the last few weeks that he wants the waivers to end, and national security adviser John Bolton has been working the issue within the administration.

U.S. to announce end to sanctions waivers for Iran oil imports: Washington Post
U.S. to announce end to sanctions waivers for Iran oil imports: Washington Post
  • World
  • 2019-04-21 23:47:29Z

The United States is preparing to announce on Monday that all importers of Iranian oil will have to end their imports shortly or be subject to U.S. sanctions, the Washington Post reported on Sunday. The U.S. reimposed sanctions in November on exports of Iranian oil after President Donald Trump unilaterally pulled out of a 2015 nuclear accord between Iran and six world powers.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Latin America

facebook
Hit "Like"
Don't miss any important news
Thanks, you don't need to show me this anymore.