Dem Rep Defends Premature Collusion Allegations as 'Completely Valid'

  • In Business
  • 2019-03-25 12:29:36Z
  • By National Review

Representative Katie Hill (D., Calif.) defended her colleagues' past assertions of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia on Monday, telling CNN's Alisyn Camerota the claim remains "completely valid" despite special counsel Robert Mueller's failure to produce any evidence to substantiate the charge.

Hill was asked whether her Democratic colleagues, including House Judiciary chairman Jerry Nadler and House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff, should apologize for asserting without evidence that Trump campaign officials colluded with Russians to sway the election in Trump's favor.

"I wouldn't say that they need to apologize. They are still stating things that happened in plain sight. The definition of collusion as a legal term is on that is completely nebulous," Hill said. "So, I think the suspicions that have been had by both the Democrats in Congress and people across the country are completely valid. Whether it was intentional or not, Trump and his associates were conducting themselves in a way that was highly, highly suspicious both during the election and after that made it so that this investigation needed to happen."

Hill's comments come one day after attorney general William Barr delivered to Congress a four-page letter that summarized his "principal conclusions" after reviewing the Mueller report and exonerated Trump on the question of collusion.

"Special counsel did not find anyone with the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government," Barr wrote.

The Mueller report does not, however, exonerate Trump on the obstruction of justice charge, but Barr determined independently that there was not sufficient evidence of that crime to produce an indictment.

"While this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him," reads a section of the report pertaining to the obstruction issue, according to Barr.


More Related News

Times' Russia report is 'virtual treason,' Trump says

US President Donald Trump on Saturday accused The New York Times of "a virtual act of treason," after it reported the US is stepping up digital incursions into Russia's electric power grid. Current and former government officials have described the classified deployment of American computer

Trump's MAGA Rallies Cost Big Bucks and Cities Are Stuck Footing the Bills

Trump's MAGA Rallies Cost Big Bucks and Cities Are Stuck Footing the Bills

Trump says he
Trump says he'd 'of course' tell FBI if he gets foreign dirt

President Donald Trump shifted gears Friday on election interference, saying "of course" he would go to the FBI or the attorney general if a foreign power offered him dirt about an opponent. "Of course, you have to look at it," Trump said during a birthday appearance on "Fox and Friends." He added: "But of course, you give it to the FBI or report it to the attorney general or somebody like that. "OK, let's put yourself in a position: You're a congressman, somebody comes up and says, 'Hey I have information on your opponent.' Do you call the FBI?

Under Fire, Trump Backtracks on Reporting Foreign
Under Fire, Trump Backtracks on Reporting Foreign 'Dirt' to FBI

"Of course you give it to the FBI" if warranted, Trump said Friday in a phone interview with Fox News. Special Counsel Robert Mueller discovered that a Russian lawyer approached Trump's son Donald Trump Jr. in 2016, offering damaging information from the Kremlin about Trump's Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton.

Trump: Ex-lawyer McGahn
Trump: Ex-lawyer McGahn 'may have been confused' in Russia probe

Former White House lawyer Don McGahn "may have been confused" during his testimony as part of U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation, President Donald Trump said in an interview broadcast on Friday. Trump, in comments to ABC News, rejected the account of McGahn, a key witness in Mueller's investigation into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and possible obstruction of justice by Trump or his associates.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply


Top News: Business

Hit "Like"
Don't miss any important news
Thanks, you don't need to show me this anymore.