Congress v. the Constitution




  • In Business
  • 2020-10-17 10:30:16Z
  • By National Review
Congress v. the Constitution
Congress v. the Constitution  
COMMENTS

More Related News

Jubilation as Chile votes to rewrite constitution
Jubilation as Chile votes to rewrite constitution

An overwhelming majority vote to tear up the dictatorship-era constitution and create a new one.

Viable unborn children can live without their mothers - our Constitution protects them
Viable unborn children can live without their mothers - our Constitution protects them

Our court has never recognized a constitutional right to life for unborn children. But with Amy Coney Barrett on the court, that may finally change.

Unemployment benefits: Racial disparity in jobless aid grows as Congress stalls on COVID-19 stimulus
Unemployment benefits: Racial disparity in jobless aid grows as Congress stalls on COVID-19 stimulus

The $600 aid began closing the gap between what Black and white Americans receive in unemployment benefits. The gap is widening again, experts warn.

What is originalism? Debunking the myths
What is originalism? Debunking the myths

Originalism has featured prominently in each of the last three Supreme Court confirmation battles - those of Neil Gorsuch in 2017, Brett Kavanaugh in 2018 and now Amy Coney Barrett. Each time, misconceptions about this theory of constitutional interpretation have swirled: Isn't originalism self-defeating because the Founders weren't originalist? Don't originalists ignore the amendments written after 1789? Do originalists think the Constitution applies only to horse-drawn carriages and muskets? As a constitutional law professor, the author of "A Debt Against the Living: An Introduction to Originalism," and an originalist, I'd like to answer some frequently asked questions about originalism...

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Business