Burr to Step Down From Senate Intel Committee While FBI Probes Stock Trading




Burr to Step Down From Senate Intel Committee While FBI Probes Stock Trading
Burr to Step Down From Senate Intel Committee While FBI Probes Stock Trading  

Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC), who is under federal investigation for potentially illegal stock trading related to the coronavirus, will be stepping down from his chairmanship of the Senate Intelligence Committee as that probe continues, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) confirmed on Thursday.

The move comes hours after agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation showed up at Burr's Washington-area home on Wednesday night with a warrant to search his cell phone for records relevant to the investigation.

In March, news outlets reported that Burr and his wife had sold as much as $1.7 million worth of stock as coronavirus fears spread in February, a sell-off that included investments in sectors, like hospitality, that were destined to be hit hard by the outbreak.

McConnell said he and Burr "agreed that this decision would be in the best interests of the committee and will be effective at the end of the day tomorrow." A McConnell spokesperson did not comment on when the GOP leader would name a replacement for Burr atop the panel.

The extraordinary step of the Senate Intelligence Committee having his phone seized by the FBI pursuant to a search warrant raised immediate questions about the tenability of Burr's position atop a committee with access to the most sensitive national security secrets the government possesses. Reportedly, the FBI also obtained a search warrant for the contents of Burr's iCloud account.

Richard Burr Doesn't Belong in the Senate. He Might Belong in Prison.

At the heart of the FBI's insider-trading investigation is determining if Burr abused his access to official secrets for his private financial gain.

Outside his Capitol Hill office on Thursday afternoon, Burr told reporters the probe "is a distraction to the hard work of the committee and the members and I think the security of the country is too important to have a distraction."

A spokesperson for the committee's vice chair, Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), said on Thursday afternoon that he believed it was appropriate for Burr to step down, and hoped the insider-trading matter was resolved quickly.

Since the news of his stock trading broke, fellow Republicans have raised questions about Burr's activity-even his fellow North Carolina Republican, Sen. Thom Tillis, who said that Burr owed the people of the state an explanation. The intel committee chief had also found himself a punching bag for allies of President Donald Trump, who have not forgiven him for conducting a probe into Russian interference in 2016-which included hauling the president's son Don, Jr. in for a deposition-that they believe was overly aggressive and misguided.

A lawmaker close to the Trumps, Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL), has frequently teed off on Burr's trades. When news broke Wednesday night of the FBI raid, Gaetz tweeted: "Where's Mitch?"

Unlike his House counterpart, Devin Nunes (R-CA), Burr has refrained from deriding the intelligence agencies as a "Deep State" cabal to bring down Trump. While also criticizing the Obama administration over its insufficient response to Russian election interference in 2016, the Senate committee under Burr recently reaffirmed the 2017 conclusions of the intelligence agencies that Russian election interference was designed to benefit Trump, a conclusion the president's allies reject.

Similarly, Burr's tenure atop the intelligence committee, beginning after the Republicans won control of the Senate in the 2014 election, began by restoring ties with the CIA after the committee, under Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), exposed the agency's post-9/11 torture program. Burr led an effort to recall the classified copies of the committee's 2014 Torture Report from around the government, in order to bury it.

Weeks after the insider trading reports appeared, Burr gave Trump's dubiously qualified nominee to run the intelligence agencies, John Ratcliffe, his unqualified support. That struck a Justice Department trial attorney as connected.

"Burr's reversal on the DNI nomination of Ratcliffe-who he knows is grossly unqualified-appears to be the product of Burr's recognition that he's in hot criminal justice water," the attorney said, "and he, like Flynn, might soon find himself dependent on Trump to bail him out."

Read more at The Daily Beast.

Get our top stories in your inbox every day. Sign up now!

Daily Beast Membership: Beast Inside goes deeper on the stories that matter to you. Learn more.

COMMENTS

More Related News

'Time to Wake Up': MSNBC's Donny Deutsch Compares Trump to Hitler, Blasts President's Jewish Supporters

Former MSNBC host Donny Deutsch compared President Trump to Adolf Hitler on Wednesday and accused Jewish supporters of the president of "walking like a lemming off a cliff."In an appearance on MSNBC's "Morning Joe," Deutsch compared Trump's latest campaign rally in Moon Township, Pa. to a "rally from the early '30s" saying there was "not one person of color anywhere."Deutsch, whose show on the liberal network ended last year, noted that former Homeland Security secretary Jeh Johnson had previously compared Trump to Hitler and said that while such comparisons should be made with caution, he felt that in this case, it was an apt comparison."But what was going on in the early '30s Germany?...

TikTok files for injunction against pending Trump app ban
TikTok files for injunction against pending Trump app ban

TikTok's fight with the Trump administration doesn't yet appear to be over, regardless of what the deal that was signed between its parent company ByteDance and Oracle says over the weekend. Earlier today, the company filed a motion to stop the Commerce Department from enforcing a ban against the popular social app. It's perhaps looking at the plight of another app, WeChat, whose users successfully argued for an injunction in San Francisco federal court this weekend that blocked the app from being banned on Sunday by the Commerce Department.

Fact check: No guarantee Obama would
Fact check: No guarantee Obama would've replaced Ginsburg with a progressive justice

The claim that Barack Obama would've replaced Ruth Bader Ginsburg with a progressive justice is lacking context.

Justice Department Refuses to Testify before Nadler
Justice Department Refuses to Testify before Nadler's Judiciary Committee

The unintended consequences of the House Democrats' anti-Trump derangement, in both infantilizing congressional oversight and foolishly pleading with the federal courts to meddle in it, are becoming manifest. On Monday, the Justice Department declined a request by House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerry Nadler (D., N.Y.) that it send top officials to testify at an oversight hearing -- or at least what was portrayed by the House as an oversight hearing; it was depicted by DOJ as more election-year political theater.DOJ's position traces to two developments in July.First, as I recounted here, the Supreme Court decided Trump v. Mazars, which involved subpoenas issued by House committees for...

2020 Watch: Is this suddenly a new election?
2020 Watch: Is this suddenly a new election?
  • World
  • 2020-09-21 09:38:04Z

The death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg injects another generational fight to an election year that already featured the deadliest public health threat in a century, the worst economic collapse since the Great Depression and the most significant civil unrest since the civil rights era. Six weeks before Election Day, the fight to replace Ginsburg is set to dominate headlines, with the prospect of reshuffling voters' priorities and campaign strategies, especially for President Donald Trump. A presidential election that was shaping up to be a referendum on Trump's divisive leadership through dueling crises may suddenly be transformed into one about Trump's next lifetime appointment to the...

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

  • Academic writing
    (2020-05-15 09:30:34Z)

    I'm eager to reveal this page. I have to thank you for ones time for this especially incredible read !! I unquestionably truly enjoyed all aspects of it and I likewise have you spared to fav to take a gander at new data in your site. This articles encourages me more.Thanks for your sharing,I will pay more considerations to your blog. Anticipating your better and better articles.See you next time.

    REPLY

Top News: Latin America