Ben Wallace isn't buying it.
Wallace appeared on the on the 120 Watts podcast and said if the Pistons had taken Anthony the team would have developed differently and might have come together in a way that it did not win a title in 2004 or any others (hat tip to NBA Reddit):
"If we would've drafted Carmelo, I honestly don't think we would have ever won a championship. Melo wanted to play right away. It would have had the potential to disrupt the team chemistry… By drafting Darko, he came in and said that he is not ready to play on this team. Who I am going to play in front of. I'm not ready, and by him doing that and accepting his role, it allowed us to build and grow and get stronger and eventually win a championship…
"If we drafted Carmelo, Tayshaun [Prince] wouldn't blossom to be the type of a player that he way. We won that championship on the back of the best block I've ever seen in my life, and I blocked a lot of shots. That is the type of grit and grind that the team had."
It's an interesting point and Wallace is right about this: We never know how a team would have developed differently if 'Melo had been a Piston. Maybe it wouldn't have worked, perhaps it would have thrown off the team chemistry and softened up that elite defense.
Still, put me in "the more talent the better" camp. Anthony is a future Hall of Famer who came into the league knowing how to get buckets. That Pistons team had some of the greatest defenses the league has ever seen, but the question was always could they score enough. Anthony would have had to accept more of a role, but he fills that scoring need. And, on a team of players he respects, Anthony is willing to play his part.
Count me with the group that thinks the Pistons win more with 'Melo than they did with Darko. Or, frankly, Chris Bosh (fourth in that draft). Or Dwyane Wade (fifth). But the Pistons made their bet and they still got a ring.
Ben Wallace not sure Pistons would have won titles if they drafted Carmelo over Darko originally appeared on NBCSports.com