Barr Suggests Impeachment Inquiry Undermines Voters' Intent




Barr Suggests Impeachment Inquiry Undermines Voters\
Barr Suggests Impeachment Inquiry Undermines Voters\' Intent  

WASHINGTON - Attorney General William Barr on Friday vigorously defended President Donald Trump's use of executive authority and suggested that House Democrats were subverting the will of voters by exploring whether to remove the president from office for abusing his power.

Trump campaigned on a vow to upend Washington, and voters were aware of his agenda when they elected him president, Barr said.

"While the president has certainly thrown out the traditional Beltway playbook and punctilio, he was upfront about what he wanted to do, and the people decided they wanted him to serve as president," Barr said in a speech at a conference hosted by the Federalist Society, a conservative legal group influential in Republican politics.

Trump's opponents "essentially see themselves as engaged in a war to cripple by any means necessary a duly elected government," Barr added.

His forceful defense of the president came after some of Trump's allies have in recent weeks accused Barr of failing to vociferously back the president. Trump was said to be frustrated that Barr urged him to release a reconstructed transcript of the July call with President Volodymyr Zelenskiy of Ukraine at the center of the impeachment case. The president also wanted Barr to hold a news conference to say the president had violated no laws, only to have Barr rebuff the request. Trump has denied that account.

Speaking for an hour at the upscale Mayflower Hotel a few blocks from the White House, Barr hit back at the president's critics on an array of fronts as he argued that Trump, in his capacity as president, has not overstepped his authority.

While Barr never uttered the word impeachment, he castigated those he sees as stalling Trump's agenda. He defended the president's right to set policies, steer the country's diplomatic and military relations and keep executive branch conversations confidential from congressional oversight.

"In waging a scorched-earth, no-holds-barred war against this administration, it is the left that is engaged in shredding norms and undermining the rule of law," Barr said.

He noted that opponents labeled themselves "the resistance" immediately after Trump was elected and accused them of "using every tool and maneuver to sabotage the functioning of the executive branch and his administration."

"Resistance is the language used to describe insurgency against rule imposed by an occupying military power," Barr said. He added that it connotes that the government is not legitimate. "This is a very dangerous and indeed incendiary notion."

Barr spoke as the second public impeachment hearing wrapped up on Capitol Hill, where Democrats have accused Trump of abusing the power of his office for personal gain.

Marie Yovanovitch, the former ambassador to Ukraine, testified that she was the target of a smear campaign engineered to get Trump to remove her; she was recalled from Kyiv in the spring. She said that her dismissal from the post put national security at risk by opening the door for Russia to further influence Ukraine, a strategic U.S. ally.

She also said that she felt devastated and threatened to learn that Trump had vilified her to Zelenskiy, testimony that Trump underscored by attacking her on Twitter as she sat before lawmakers.

In his address, Barr suggested the president has acted within his powers and that his opponents were willing to bend the law to stop him.

Barr is known as an executive power maximalist and believer in the unitary executive theory, which posits that the Constitution imbues the presidency with broad powers that are subject to relatively little oversight.

He has argued, for example, that Congress cannot make it a crime for a president to exercise executive powers corruptly and that presidents have authority over law enforcement investigations even when investigators are scrutinizing their activity.

On Friday, Barr hit back against criticisms of his view of executive authority.

"Some of you may recall when I was up for confirmation, all these Democratic senators saying how concerned they were about my adherence to the unitary executive theory," Barr said.

"This is not new, and it's not a theory," Barr said, calling his viewpoint a straightforward description of the powers that the Constitution gives the president. "Whatever the executive power may be, those powers must be exercised under the president's supervision," he said.

Barr's assessment was a "highly contestable - and in my view, seriously mistaken - reading of history," said Peter Shane, a former Justice Department official and Ohio State University law professor who specializes in the separation of powers.

"He overreads the vesting of executive power, ignores the limitations on executive power implicit in other clauses, and ignores evidence of what voters in favor of ratification would have expected from the text," Shane said. "He is, indeed, a maximalist."

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.


© 2019 The New York Times Company



COMMENTS

More Related News

Trump Call
Trump Call 'Less Than Perfect,' Defense Says: Impeachment Update

(Bloomberg) -- Donald Trump's defense lawyers resume their presentation at 1 p.m. Monday after opening their arguments Saturday by saying House managers failed to prove the president should be removed from office.Here are the latest developments:Trump Call 'Less Than Perfect,' Defense Says (7:45 p.m.)Former independent counsel Robert Ray said Trump's July 25 call with Ukraine's president was "less than perfect," but that doesn't mean it's an impeachable abuse of power.It would have been better for Trump to have pursued an investigation "through proper channels," said Ray, a member of Trump's legal team."While the president certainly enjoys the power to do otherwise, there is consequence...

Fox News Anchor Chris Wallace Tears Into Conservative Pundit:
Fox News Anchor Chris Wallace Tears Into Conservative Pundit: 'Get Your Facts Straight!'

Sparks flew Monday on the Fox News set between Fox News anchor Chris Wallace and conservative contributor Katie Pavlich, with Wallace demanding his colleague get her "facts straight" after Pavlich insisted that certain witnesses had not been called in the impeachment trial.Moments before President Donald Trump's defense team began its arguments in the Senate impeachment trial, Pavlich noted during Fox's pregame coverage that while Republican senators are now weighing whether to call former National Security Adviser John Bolton following his bombshell claims, the House should have presented a more thorough case."The Senate is not the House, the House did not come with a complete case, and...

Democrats demand Bolton testify after NYT report Trump directly told him Ukraine aid tied to investigations
Democrats demand Bolton testify after NYT report Trump directly told him Ukraine aid tied to investigations

President Donald Trump told John Bolton he wanted to freeze military aid to Ukraine until it investigated his Democratic rivals, a report said.

Senate should remove Trump, majority of independent voters say in Fox News poll
Senate should remove Trump, majority of independent voters say in Fox News poll

Overall, 50% of registered voters said in a Fox News poll that President Trump should be convicted and removed in the Senate; 44% said he should not.

Senate floor belongs to Trump team as defense case opens
Senate floor belongs to Trump team as defense case opens

The floor of the U.S. Senate now belongs to President Donald Trump's lawyers as they push the Republican-led chamber for an acquittal on charges that he abused his power and obstructed Congress. The president's attorneys will begin their arguments Saturday in the impeachment trial and are expected

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Economy