That's the consequence of his trade request.
But is something else at play, too?
Rod Walker of The Times-Picayune:
Racism absolutely factored into how Davis was treated last season. Racism factors into so many aspects of American life.
Resistance to player empowerment - in a league where majority-white owners have traditionally held significant control over majority-black players - is rooted in racism.
But that isn't the whole story.
Davis issued his trade request in a way that maximized resentment from Pelicans fans, no matter what their racial views. First of all, he tried to leave their favorite team. That's enough - especially after Anthony set expectations by repeatedly expressing his affection for New Orleans. But he also requested a trade during the season, sending a team with at least at outside shot of the playoffs into chaos as games were still occurring. On top of all that, he tried to steer himself to the loathed Lakers.
That's quite different than Paul George. George didn't request a trade. He told the Pacers he would leave them the following summer. He was obviously trying to induce a trade, but if Indiana kept him the upcoming season, he seemingly would've complied. He also had his saga play out during the offseason. If he were still playing, you can bet Indiana fans would've booed him.
I think Shelburne is a little too inside the game here. Only a certain segment of diehard fans can identify agents, let alone their races. It's far more about the players.
Paul is close to an exception, through. Through his representation of LeBron James and unapologetic style, Paul has gained a high level of fame. His blackness certainly affects how people view him.
But it'd be a mistake to isolate Paul, New Orleans or the South. These issues exist far wider. We should discuss them in a fuller context, not as something unique to this situation.