Analysis: How India's actions in Kashmir could spark a new war with Pakistan




 

Days after Donald Trump offered to bring his dealmaking skills to bear on India and Pakistan's seemingly intractable Kashmir dispute, Narendra Modi has dramatically shaken up the pieces of the puzzle.

The Indian prime minister's sudden move to revoke Indian-administered Kashmir's special status may have been in his manifesto for two elections, but it has caused domestic and international shock nonetheless.

Abolishing the region's autonomy by revoking article 370, and thus paving the way for Hindu migrants to buy land and take jobs in the Muslim majority area, increases Mr Modi's standing as a populist strongman. But it will perhaps irrevocably damage Delhi's relations with the residents of Kashmir, stoking militant violence in a region long known as a jihadist hotspot. And it also risks destablising a frozen conflict which has brought India and Pakistan to war three times.

"The revocation of article 370 is a major tipping point for an already-fraught dispute. It's hard to overstate the magnitude of this move," said Michael Kugelman, deputy director of the Asia Program at the Washington-based The Wilson Centre.

Kashmir is at the heart of hostility between India and Pakistan, with the territory effectively partitioned between them. On the Pakistani side, condemnation of India's presence in Kashmir and its abuses against residents is an emotive cross-party issue.

While the government issued a brusque denunciation, elsewhere the rhetoric was more bellicose. The president of Pakistan-controlled Kashmir warned that the two countries could "go to war". Saifullah Niazi, a close aide to prime minister Imran Khan said India had " pushed the whole region towards an unending conflict. The conflict has consumed generations over the past 70 years and will further escalate to new heights," he said.

Tensions had already been high between the nuclear armed neighbours after February's suicide bomb that killed 40 paramilitary police in Pulwama. India blamed Pakistan-based militants and launched retaliatory air strikes.

In such circumstances, hopes of reconciliation seem remote, even with Mr Trump's help. India has always rejected calls for outside mediation anyway, saying Kashmir is a bilateral issue to be sorted out between the neighbours.

Politicians in Mr Modi's ruling BJP party argue that Kashmir's special status has made it difficult to integrate the region with the rest of the country and has therefore held back development. The issue is an internal administrative matter they claim. But the ramifications are unlikely to be contained locally, with dangerous consequences once again for the whole region.

COMMENTS

More Related News

After interview, Pompeo cursed at reporter, yelled:
After interview, Pompeo cursed at reporter, yelled: 'Do you think Americans care about Ukraine?'

Sec. Pompeo unloaded on NPR host Mary Louise Kelly after an interview in which she questioned him about Ukraine and other hot-button issues, NPR said.

Pentagon: 34 US troops had brain injuries from Iran
Pentagon: 34 US troops had brain injuries from Iran's strike
  • World
  • 2020-01-24 18:29:47Z

The Pentagon said Friday that 34 U.S. troops were diagnosed with traumatic brain injuries suffered in this month's Iranian missile strike on an Iraqi air base, and that half of the troops have returned to their military duties. Seventeen of the 34 are still under medical observation, according to Jonathan Hoffman, the chief Pentagon spokesman. President Donald Trump had initially said he was told that no troops had been injured in the Jan. 8 strike.

'Take her out': Recording appears to capture Trump at private dinner saying he wants Ukraine ambassador fired

A recording reviewed by ABC News appears to capture President Donald Trump telling associates he wanted the then-U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch fired while speaking at a small gathering that included Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman -- two former business associates of Trump's personal lawyer

Now Testifying for the Prosecution: President Trump
Now Testifying for the Prosecution: President Trump

WASHINGTON -- The House managers prosecuting President Donald Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors have failed so far to persuade Senate Republicans to let them call new witnesses in his impeachment trial. But in their own way, they have come up with a star witness they can bring to the floor: Trump

Protesters rally at Capitol as Democrats make opening arguments in impeachment trial - live updates
Protesters rally at Capitol as Democrats make opening arguments in impeachment trial - live updates

House impeachment managers, led by Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., have 24 hours, over three days, to argue their case against Trump.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Latin America